What's new

Sugar Inquiry Commission Report May 2020

Baghial

SENIOR MEMBER
Feb 17, 2017
5,134
-22
3,143
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Click to DownloadSugar Inquiry Commission Report (signed 347 pages).pdf
0 bytes



Pakistan-day-light-robbers.jpg
 

Baghial

SENIOR MEMBER
Feb 17, 2017
5,134
-22
3,143
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
many important questions left un - answered? in report

and shazad akbar said , sugar mills are from khsuroo brother, not his .so he innocent, no conflict of intrest

the only one that seems to be guilty is omni group/ zardari?


EYeGke0WsAEnpQr


are the culprits going to be punished?>
un-clear

will FIA, further probe, and prosecute punish un - clear

will the inquiry , be made reference in NAB? un-clear

will it be used to pressurise certain person/parties? un-clear

RS.30 billion sibsidy was given in 2017 by sindh govt,
no subsidy for 2018
2019.
why omini group then?
 

Baghial

SENIOR MEMBER
Feb 17, 2017
5,134
-22
3,143
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Sales transactions From October, Z017 to February, 2020. 363. Most of the sale transactions are conducted in the names of persons who are unregistered in sales tax. Largely the particulars like CNIC numbers and addresses of such unregistered persons are not maintained or made available to the tax authorities by the sugar Mills. Benaaml sales transactions are mostly conducted in the garb of such unregistered persons. The enormity of sales transactions declared and unregistered person involved can be ascertained from the following data declared to FBR during October, 2017 to February, 2020 by six (6) sugar mills under forensic audit:

Approximately 71% of total sales, from October, 2017 to February, 2020, have been declared to be made to unregistered buyers. A comparison of particulars of the buyers as appearing in sale data of the Company with the declared buyers as appearing in Annexure-C of the sale tax returns of the Company was made. It was found that, during the period October 2019 —January 2020, both data do not match with each other. This aspect of maintaining different records for the same transactions alone, makes all such transactions suspected to be benami. Analysis of the sales data (REPORT NO. SALES-102 - Consolidated Sugar Sales Statement) of Unit-II of the Company for the year 2019-2020 transpired that during the period November 27, 2019 and March 17, 2020, Unit II has sold a total of 1,741,880 bags (SO Kgs) of sugar aggregating to Rs. 5,831,171,000. It has been observed that for every sale transaction, a Delivery Order (DO) is issued to one person and another person is recorded as a dealer for the said sale. However, when the team extracted a separate report (REPORT NO. SALES-052 - DAILY SUGAR DESPATCH REPORT) the persons mentioned as "Customer" have been found to be mentioned as "Brokers" therein. In order to clarify the discrepancy, the team investigated GM Sales of the Company, who conceded that most of these are "made up" names. As per the provisions of BTPA, 2017 booking of sales In made up names/fictitious names constitute benami sale transactions. He shared a list of actual brokers and the benami / fictitious names being used against those brokers

Forensic audit shows that mostly the benami sales transactions are recorded against unregistered persons. Out of total sales of MW Company of around Rs. 100 billion "sale of around Rs. 71.8 billion is suspected to be benami transactions" during the period from October, 2017 to February, 2020.

Sales transactions From October, Z017 to February, 2020. 363. Most of the sale transactions are conducted in the names of persons who are unregistered in sales tax. Largely the particulars like CNIC numbers and addresses of such unregistered persons are not maintained or made available to the tax authorities by the sugar Mills. Benaaml sales transactions are mostly conducted in the garb of such unregistered persons. The enormity of sales transactions declared and unregistered person involved can be ascertained from the following data declared to FBR during October, 2017 to February, 2020 by six (6) sugar mills under forensic audit:

Approximately 71% of total sales, from October, 2017 to February, 2020, have been declared to be made to unregistered buyers. A comparison of particulars of the buyers as appearing in sale data of the Company with the declared buyers as appearing in Annexure-C of the sale tax returns of the Company was made. It was found that, during the period October 2019 —January 2020, both data do not match with each other. This aspect of maintaining different records for the same transactions alone, makes all such transactions suspected to be benami. Analysis of the sales data (REPORT NO. SALES-102 - Consolidated Sugar Sales Statement) of Unit-II of the Company for the year 2019-2020 transpired that during the period November 27, 2019 and March 17, 2020, Unit II has sold a total of 1,741,880 bags (SO Kgs) of sugar aggregating to Rs. 5,831,171,000. It has been observed that for every sale transaction, a Delivery Order (DO) is issued to one person and another person is recorded as a dealer for the said sale. However, when the team extracted a separate report (REPORT NO. SALES-052 - DAILY SUGAR DESPATCH REPORT) the persons mentioned as "Customer" have been found to be mentioned as "Brokers" therein. In order to clarify the discrepancy, the team investigated GM Sales of the Company, who conceded that most of these are "made up" names. As per the provisions of BTPA, 2017 booking of sales In made up names/fictitious names constitute benami sale transactions. He shared a list of actual brokers and the benami / fictitious names being used against those brokers

Forensic audit shows that mostly the benami sales transactions are recorded against unregistered persons. Out of total sales of MW Company of around Rs. 100 billion "sale of around Rs. 71.8 billion is suspected to be benami transactions" during the period from October, 2017 to February, 2020.














412. For the period October 2017 to February 2020 total sales of sugar In Pakistan was more than Rs. 723 billion and 71% sales (Rs. 517 billion) of all Sugar Mills are benami sales transactions against CNICs of unregistered "benamidars" mostly truck drivers, loaders, employees of the mills or dummy fictitious persons, who are unaware of such transactions booked/invoiced in their names.

Sales transactions From October, Z017 to February, 2020. 363. Most of the sale transactions are conducted in the names of persons who are unregistered in sales tax. Largely the particulars like CNIC numbers and addresses of such unregistered persons are not maintained or made available to the tax authorities by the sugar Mills. Benaaml sales transactions are mostly conducted in the garb of such unregistered persons. The enormity of sales transactions declared and unregistered person involved can be ascertained from the following data declared to FBR during October, 2017 to February, 2020 by six (6) sugar mills under forensic audit:

Approximately 71% of total sales, from October, 2017 to February, 2020, have been declared to be made to unregistered buyers. A comparison of particulars of the buyers as appearing in sale data of the Company with the declared buyers as appearing in Annexure-C of the sale tax returns of the Company was made. It was found that, during the period October 2019 —January 2020, both data do not match with each other. This aspect of maintaining different records for the same transactions alone, makes all such transactions suspected to be benami. Analysis of the sales data (REPORT NO. SALES-102 - Consolidated Sugar Sales Statement) of Unit-II of the Company for the year 2019-2020 transpired that during the period November 27, 2019 and March 17, 2020, Unit II has sold a total of 1,741,880 bags (SO Kgs) of sugar aggregating to Rs. 5,831,171,000. It has been observed that for every sale transaction, a Delivery Order (DO) is issued to one person and another person is recorded as a dealer for the said sale. However, when the team extracted a separate report (REPORT NO. SALES-052 - DAILY SUGAR DESPATCH REPORT) the persons mentioned as "Customer" have been found to be mentioned as "Brokers" therein. In order to clarify the discrepancy, the team investigated GM Sales of the Company, who conceded that most of these are "made up" names. As per the provisions of BTPA, 2017 booking of sales In made up names/fictitious names constitute benami sale transactions. He shared a list of actual brokers and the benami / fictitious names being used against those brokers

Forensic audit shows that mostly the benami sales transactions are recorded against unregistered persons. Out of total sales of MW Company of around Rs. 100 billion "sale of around Rs. 71.8 billion is suspected to be benami transactions" during the period from October, 2017 to February, 2020.
















412. For the period October 2017 to February 2020 total sales of sugar In Pakistan was more than Rs. 723 billion and 71% sales (Rs. 517 billion) of all Sugar Mills are benami sales transactions against CNICs of unregistered "benamidars" mostly truck drivers, loaders, employees of the mills or dummy fictitious persons, who are unaware of such transactions booked/invoiced in their names.














conclusions...........

Recommendation 475. The offences fall under the purview of; National Accountability Ordinance (GAO) 1999 Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 Companies Act, 2017 W. Sales Tax Act, 1990 v. Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 A. Sugar Factories Control Act, 1950 476. The Government may refer the case to the relevant authorities as deemed appropriate.
 

Morpheus

SENIOR MEMBER
Mar 5, 2017
3,064
-1
7,536
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Here is a working link


Download it yourself and see. It talks about the details of ALL players involved, and what the finds were. Also Gives recommendation and what further things need to be investigated. Better to read it yourself, instead of reading other's opinion (Like OP).
 

Syed1.

BANNED
Dec 7, 2016
6,307
-1
12,050
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
So biggest culprits as expected are the Sharif khandaan and Omni group. Murad Ali Shah as CM Sindh gave subsidy just for Omni group for Rs 9 billion. Kha kha ke khatum kar diya hai meray mulk ko.


Thanks to our lovely establishment all these chor are out of jail and PPP are in their 13th consecutive year in power.
 

tkmd

FULL MEMBER
Aug 24, 2013
397
0
474
there is only one solution....execute the thieves. Nothing else can fix this corrupt system. And for those saying IK didn’t do anything, which govt in the last 20 years ever published a report that implicated its own senior members? He is doing more than anyone else has in my lifetime to promote Pakistan, expose India for what is always has been and reform Pakistan. He wont always be right, he wont always win, but he’s better than the clowns and thieves before him. And this is from someone who defended PMLN on this forum for a long time. I was wrong and am fortunate that Pakistan disagreed with me and chose the right man for the job.
 

Baghial

SENIOR MEMBER
Feb 17, 2017
5,134
-22
3,143
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
So biggest culprits as expected are the Sharif khandaan and Omni group. Murad Ali Shah as CM Sindh gave subsidy just for Omni group for Rs 9 billion. Kha kha ke khatum kar diya hai meray mulk ko.


Thanks to our lovely establishment all these chor are out of jail and PPP are in their 13th consecutive year in power.


NOT REALY? BECAUSE THE INQUIRY REPORT IS FROM 2018/2019

WHILE SUBSIDY IN SIND WAS NOT GIVEN IN 18/2019

THE LAST SUBSIDY WAS IN 2017......

THE INQUIRY IS SILENT ABOUT THE ROLE OF CM-PUNJAB

MORE QUESTION, THEN ANSWERS IN THIS REPORT.

WHILE SHAZAD AKBAR WAS DEFENDING KHUSROO BHAKTAIR.. IN HIS PRESS CONFRENCE, CLEARING HIM AWAY,ON ANY CONFLICT OF INTREST, BECAUSE SUGAR MILLS ARE ON NAME OF HIS BROTHER?

KHUSROO WONT BE STUPID TO BE IN GOVT AND HAVE ASSETS AKING BILLIONS OF PROFITS ON HIS NAME.
EVERY ONE THINKS AWAAM IS STUPID.


EVERY MILL WAS SELLING SUGAR TO BOGUS CLIENTS,
, TRANSPORTATION,,,,,,,, TO AFGHAN-- A TRUCK WHICH HAS MAX CAP OF 25 TONS--WAS HAULING 70 TONS ON PAPER?

So biggest culprits as expected are the Sharif khandaan and Omni group. Murad Ali Shah as CM Sindh gave subsidy just for Omni group for Rs 9 billion. Kha kha ke khatum kar diya hai meray mulk ko.


Thanks to our lovely establishment all these chor are out of jail and PPP are in their 13th consecutive year in power.


IF IN ANY NEAR FUTURE AN INQUIRY IS HELD FOR IPPS POWER SECTOR,
YOU WILL FLIP OVER TO SEE PROFIT OF 80% ON 100 BILLION RPS CORRUPTION
SUGAR SCAM WILL BE LIKE PEANUTS -INFRONT OF POWER SCANDEL CORRUPTION,

BUISNESSMEN COME IN POWER TO PROTECT THERE BUISNESS ' NOT FOR THE PLEASURE OF AWAAM AND THERE PROBLEM,S.



IT HAS BEEN GOING IN 1 DIRECTION, SINCE 60'S
TAKE ANY GOT, N U WILL SEE ALL THE USUAL SYSPECTS

NOTHING HAS CHANGED EVEN IN IMRAN,S (TABDELI)

PTI. JUST WANTS TO CRUSH NAWAZ N ZARDARI,,-WHILE THE COHERTS OF THESE 2 ARE STILL HAND N HAND WITH SO CALLED IMRAN KHAN,S CHANGE,


IF IMRAN REALY WANTED A CHANGE, WELL THAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED IN 1ST 90 DAYS

NOW- THE FALSE TIME PASSING SLOGEN, GIVE HIM MORE TIME'
GIVE HIM MORE TIME,

TAKE ALL THE TIME WHICH HAS BEEN GIVEN TO U BY YOUR SELECTED MASTERS,
END WILL BE HORRIBLE FOR BOTH PARTIES, SELECTORS N SELECTED.
 

Syed1.

BANNED
Dec 7, 2016
6,307
-1
12,050
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
NOT REALY? BECAUSE THE INQUIRY REPORT IS FROM 2018/2019

WHILE SUBSIDY IN SIND WAS NOT GIVEN IN 18/2019

THE LAST SUBSIDY WAS IN 2017......

THE INQUIRY IS SILENT ABOUT THE ROLE OF CM-PUNJAB

MORE QUESTION, THEN ANSWERS IN THIS REPORT.

WHILE SHAZAD AKBAR WAS DEFENDING KHUSROO BHAKTAIR.. IN HIS PRESS CONFRENCE, CLEARING HIM AWAY,ON ANY CONFLICT OF INTREST, BECAUSE SUGAR MILLS ARE ON NAME OF HIS BROTHER?

KHUSROO WONT BE STUPID TO BE IN GOVT AND HAVE ASSETS AKING BILLIONS OF PROFITS ON HIS NAME.
EVERY ONE THINKS AWAAM IS STUPID.


EVERY MILL WAS SELLING SUGAR TO BOGUS CLIENTS,
, TRANSPORTATION,,,,,,,, TO AFGHAN-- A TRUCK WHICH HAS MAX CAP OF 25 TONS--WAS HAULING 70 TONS ON PAPER?




IF IN ANY NEAR FUTURE AN INQUIRY IS HELD FOR IPPS POWER SECTOR,
YOU WILL FLIP OVER TO SEE PROFIT OF 80% ON 100 BILLION RPS CORRUPTION
SUGAR SCAM WILL BE LIKE PEANUTS -INFRONT OF POWER SCANDEL CORRUPTION,

BUISNESSMEN COME IN POWER TO PROTECT THERE BUISNESS ' NOT FOR THE PLEASURE OF AWAAM AND THERE PROBLEM,S.



IT HAS BEEN GOING IN 1 DIRECTION, SINCE 60'S
TAKE ANY GOT, N U WILL SEE ALL THE USUAL SYSPECTS

NOTHING HAS CHANGED EVEN IN IMRAN,S (TABDELI)

PTI. JUST WANTS TO CRUSH NAWAZ N ZARDARI,,-WHILE THE COHERTS OF THESE 2 ARE STILL HAND N HAND WITH SO CALLED IMRAN KHAN,S CHANGE,


IF IMRAN REALY WANTED A CHANGE, WELL THAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED IN 1ST 90 DAYS

NOW- THE FALSE TIME PASSING SLOGEN, GIVE HIM MORE TIME'
GIVE HIM MORE TIME,

TAKE ALL THE TIME WHICH HAS BEEN GIVEN TO U BY YOUR SELECTED MASTERS,
END WILL BE HORRIBLE FOR BOTH PARTIES, SELECTORS N SELECTED.
First learn to type without caps lock then expect a response. Didn't read your bull shit.
 

Baghial

SENIOR MEMBER
Feb 17, 2017
5,134
-22
3,143
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
First learn to type without caps lock then expect a response. Didn't read your bull shit.
out of 78 sugar mills , why forensic of only 10 sugar mills,?

out of 78 sugar mills , why forensic of only 10 sugar mills,?

in panama case , 29 agencies came with 10 boxes( 10 volumes) of evidence.

but at the end, nothing stood ground, just 1 akma..

out of 450+-, pakistani peoples names were in panama papers ' only 1 was selected for justice?


sugar inquiry report is 430+- pages, 78 sugar mills- but only 10 were slected .for selected justice?
3 from JKt, 2 from sharifs,?

tit for tat politics, but when the case will go to NAB----- bleak chances for any punishment.
 

HAIDER

ELITE MEMBER
May 21, 2006
26,586
11
27,640
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
at least this is first gov whom take few steps and make it public
People still bash Imran Khan ...he is doing best he can do.... Hope he will win next election...
The only guy missing in this report is ........ Khusro Baitbar ...
But, I am more curious about IPP report... that is mega scam and LNG contracts ..
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom