What's new

South Korea affirms cool Japan relations, warm China ties in defence white paper

Nan Yang

May 1, 2010
South Korea affirms cool Japan relations, warm China ties in defence white paper
  • Seoul has dropped a reference to Tokyo as a ‘partner’ in the document, but pledged to develop closer ties with Beijing – prompting a reaction from Washington
  • An analyst says the paper, written last year, failed to take into account growing momentum within the Moon administration to normalise ties with Japan
Park Chan-kyong
Published: 3:17pm, 3 Feb, 2021
Updated: 11:37pm, 3 Feb, 2021

South Korean army special forces take part in a 2019 military drill at Dokdo islets, which are also claimed by Japan. Photo: AFP

South Korean army special forces take part in a 2019 military drill at Dokdo islets, which are also claimed by Japan. Photo: AFP

South Korea’s defence ministry has dropped its description of Japan as a “partner” in its latest defence white paper, while highlighting better relations with China – prompting Washington to stress that Tokyo and Seoul are its most important allies in maintaining peace and security in Asia.

The 2020 Defence White Paper, published on Tuesday, described South Korea and Japan as “close neighbours”, in contrast to the previous biennial report published in early 2019 that described the countries as “geographically and culturally close neighbours as well as partners cooperating for global peace and prosperity”.

The 2020 paper also dropped a reference to China reacting strongly to South Korea’s 2016 decision to deploy a hi-tech US missile defence system. The Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) was intended as a shield against North Korea’s missile threat, but Beijing believed the system could penetrate its territory and retaliated by banning outbound tours to South Korea and hitting its economy hard through other restrictions.

Instead, the paper noted that efforts to broker better ties began with South Korean President Moon Jae-in’s first year in office in 2017, when both sides held a summit. Bilateral defence cooperation would be challenging given the Covid-19 pandemic, it said, but the countries would continue communicating and bolstering exchanges to develop “bilateral ties steadily and to secure peace and prosperity on the Korean peninsula and the region”.

The references reflect Seoul’s ongoing intent to maintain good relations with its largest trading partner, China, even as the new administration in the United States under President Joe Bidenseeks to bring Washington and Tokyo together as a bulwark against Beijing’s influence in the region.

But Professor Lee Won-deog of Kukmin University, an expert on Korea-Japan relations, said the white paper, edited months earlier, had failed to keep up with “subtle changes” in Seoul’s policy stance towards Tokyo.

“Concerns are growing in the Moon government over the fraught ties with Japan, and efforts to normalise them are gaining momentum,” he said, pointing to Seoul’s “low-key” reaction to a court rulinglast month that ordered Tokyo to pay 100 million Korean won (US$89,300) each to 12 Korean women forced to work as sex slaves for Japanese troops during World War II.

South Korean President Moon Jae-in last week told a briefing for security officials that Seoul and Tokyo should ‘not stay in the past’. Photo: DPA

South Korean President Moon Jae-in last week told a briefing for security officials that Seoul and Tokyo should ‘not stay in the past’. Photo: DPA

Japan rejected the ruling, saying among other things that it violated a 1965 treaty that settled compensation issues related to its 1910-1945 colonial rule of the Korean peninsulaand a bilateral agreement reached in 2015 to “finally and irreversibly” resolve the so-called comfort women issue.

South Korea’s foreign ministry later said Seoul would not seek additional compensation from Tokyo and would try its best to “reach an amicable settlement by communicating with the comfort women”, while Moon last week told a briefing for security officials that Seoul and Tokyo should “not stay in the past” – a reference to the tensions that still simmer between the two countries over Japan’s colonial history.

However, the South Korean defence ministry official who briefed journalists on Tuesday about the white paper defended the decision to describe South Korea and Japan as “neighbours”, due to “undesirable relations over various issues”.

The white paper reeled off a list of issues that would impede “forward-looking defence relations” between the countries. Among them were “distorted perceptions” about Japan’s colonial past still harboured by Japanese political leaders; Japan laying a claim to South Korea’s Dokdo islets, known as Takeshima in Japan; a 2018 incident in which a Japanese military surveillance plane flew too close to a South Korean navy vessel, prompting the latter to lock on to the planewith its fire-control radar; and Japan’s 2019 export controls on some hi-tech products to South Korea in retaliation over decisions by South Korean courts ordering Japanese companies to compensate the families of Koreans who were forced into labour during World War II.

In response, Japan’s defence ministry on Tuesday called in South Korea’s military attaché in Tokyo and expressed regret that the white paper blamed Japan for hampering military cooperation.

John Supple, a spokesperson for the US Department of Defense, on Tuesday said Washington would continue to expand cooperation among the US, South Korea and Japan.

This was “vital to the maintenance of regional peace, prosperity, and stability – to include addressing the North Korea nuclear and ballistic missile threat and maintaining the rules-based international order,” he said in emailed responses to South Korean news agency Yonhap.

Yonhap, in its report, described the revised description of Japan in the white paper as a “downgrade” that was a tit-for-tat measure after Tokyo’s annual defence white paper last year dropped a passage that had appeared in its 2019 version, which said Japan planned to continue defence cooperation with South Korea.

Instead, it said “issues between the two countries are affecting bilateral defence cooperation and exchange”, citing the 2018 fire-control radar and Seoul’s threats to end their intelligence-sharing agreement, known as the General Security of Military Information Agreement.

Tokyo’s paper also suggested South Korea was a lower priority than other countries with which it was seeking defence cooperation, a far cry from the 2016 paper that said South Korea was “the most important neighbouring country, which shares strategic interests, and is extremely vital to Japan in geopolitical terms”.

The 2016 version continued: “In addition, the two countries share many strategic interests as allies of the US. Therefore, even if difficult issues occasionally arise, close collaboration between the two countries on the security front has enormous significance for the peace and stability of the Asia-Pacific region.”

On North Korea, the 2020 South Korean defence white paper reflected Seoul’s ongoing efforts at reconciliation and provided updates on Pyongyang’s military activities.

In 2019 alone, the North carried out a total of 13 missile tests and rolled out several new types of ballistic missiles, including a submarine-launched ballistic missile, the white paper noted.

As for Pyongyang’s nuclear stockpiles, the latest document maintained its estimate that the hermit nation possessed 50kg of weapons-grade plutonium, enough for up to 10 nuclear weapons, and that its technology to miniaturise a nuclear warhead had reached a “considerable” level.

At a rare party congressthat took place last month, leader Kim Jong-un vowed to bolster the North’s nuclear arsenal and develop nuclear-powered submarines, advanced nuclear warheads and hypersonic weapons.

Place Of Space

Dec 6, 2014
In long term Korea will return to their tradition, whatever to say, China and Korea was a thousand year ally.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Top Bottom