What's new

Sikhs in Canada vote in a Referendum for Khalistan - Sep 2022 .

Hindustani78

BANNED
Apr 8, 2014
40,498
-46
12,845
Country
India
Location
India
Tu khalsa aa?

Tu ???

Khanjar Lawo !!!

3 (1).jpg




Na sada hindustan na tera sarkar.

Hindu Rashtra >>> Hindu Sarkar >>> Hindustan Zindabad !!!
download (3).jpg




Sada virsa aapna ha.

Virsa Khallas !!! Waris bhi Khallas !!! ALLAH Hu AKBAR !!!


muharram687507896750791278.jpg


f21c62ce850649d0e0f81ffdb8ed61e7.jpg


Sanu na dasi kadi ki haiga khalsa. Aayi kadi khalsa sikhi che asi dasange. Mai ya we sari duniya ne kar rakhe ya khalsa sikhi da.

Huzur Sahib !!! Nanded Sahib Dakkan e Hindustan !!!

images.jpg



Sade wal aayi kadi mitra, asi das de ha

Passport ???
 

PakistaniandProud

FULL MEMBER
Apr 30, 2012
878
0
912
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
They were given a choice by jinnah but their dumb leaders chose India or freedom over joining pakistan

Yes, & due to that, they can no longer claim the Pakistani portion of Punjab for an independent Khalistan. They only have claims on the Indian portion since their very own leaders gave up the Pakistani side once they decided to stay with Hindus.

This is something those pro Hindutva Indians must understand when it comes to Khalistan. Sikhs have no claims and cannot have any such claim of Pakistan's Punjab.
 

Pakistan Ka Beta

SENIOR MEMBER
Aug 7, 2019
3,062
8
7,545
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
They can create a Khalistan in Toronto who gives a damn? Pakistanis seem more enthusiastic about creation of Khalistan than Sikhs themselves :lol:.

Both of you are right in your assertions. Identities related to Race / Occupation / Ethnicity / Linguistics overlap so much that its impossible to say anything either way. My understanding was that Jat (pronounced Jaat, with a strong 'T') is nothing but the Hindi word for caste, which is Jaat (pronounced with a soft 'T'). The theory being that when Indo Scythians settled in the Punjab plains and took on the role of agriculturists, they realised that they didn't fit into the Indo Aryan caste system. Remember that Indo Aryans were nomads before settling in India and did not have an agricultural caste. Large land owners were powerful people and it was not acceptable to them that they be considered outcastes. So they probably used the word Jaat to insist that they are people with a caste. This may be all hogwash, and maybe the word Jutt originates elsewhere.

What would you say Punjabi is? A regional identity? A race? A linguistic group? An ethnic group? All of it?

It looks so

Good, Canada should invade India and liberate Khalistan. 😂

It's strange there is Pakistani support for Khalistan as a bigger chunk of Pakistan is also claimed by Khalistan.



All states in India are semi - autonomous. The ones that aren't are called union territories.

There are only 10 completely autonomous districts in India and they belong in these 4 states (Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Tripura)
They have better chance in making canada khalistan.
 

Rusty2

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Apr 19, 2021
59
0
69
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
Yes, & due to that, they can no longer claim the Pakistani portion of Punjab for an independent Khalistan. They only have claims on the Indian portion since their very own leaders gave up the Pakistani side once they decided to stay with Hindus.

This is something those pro Hindutva Indians must understand when it comes to Khalistan. Sikhs have no claims and cannot have any such claim of Pakistan's Punjab.
HIndutvas do not care for reality or truths. They only care about point scoring and pushing their agenda.
They know that Sikhs have no claim on Pakistan but they still push this since it allows them to divert away from the very real claim Sikhs have to Khalistan in Indian occupied Punjab.
 

bharat62

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Aug 26, 2022
79
0
36
Country
India
Location
India
HIndutvas do not care for reality or truths. They only care about point scoring and pushing their agenda.
They know that Sikhs have no claim on Pakistan but they still push this since it allows them to divert away from the very real claim Sikhs have to Khalistan in Indian occupied Punjab.
Why sikhs have no claim on pakistan ? They were living in those areas before partition .
 

Rusty2

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Apr 19, 2021
59
0
69
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
Why sikhs have no claim on pakistan ? They were living in those areas before partition .
And?
Once partition happened, they chose India and forfeit all claims to Pakistan.
Just like Pakistanis Punjabis have forfeit our claims to Indian occupied Punjab.
Now I don't expect you to understand these high fluent ideas so I will make it simple for you.
Majority Sikhs live in Indian occupied Punjab, therefore, that is their Khalistan.
You can eat all the copium you want about them claiming Pakistani Punjab, but that is and will never be the reality.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom