Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="peagle" data-source="post: 13526763" data-attributes="member: 198019">I'm sorry yaar, but you are seriously mistaken. UK is not the only parliamentary system in the world, neither is it the only successful one. There are many dozens of countries with parliamentary forms of government, and many successful one, more then the Presidential forms.Parliamentary forms of government and presidential forms come in different formats. UK is not the only successful parliamentary form of government, there are many others, such as Canada, New Zeeland, Australia, Sweden, Germany, Ireland, the list goes on. The parliamentary form of government is far more inclusive then a presidential form of government.But, you already have contradicted yourself by suggesting limitations, you have suggested changes, but that's the point, no system is perfect. It has to be changed and adopted to suit the needs of every country. There will always be a need to make changes over time, every constitution changes over time because the requirements of governance change. So rather then continuously demanding a new form of government every few decades, stick with the one you have, continue making small changes, when required, and it will entrench and stabilise over time.The modern mature western democracies did not become perfect overnight, it took time, effort and adjustment, that is the most important part, not drastic change, but sticking with the same system and making small adjustments, not drastic change every time you get bored.</blockquote>

Verification