• Thursday, December 12, 2019

Shaheen III | News & Discussions.

Discussion in 'Pakistan Strategic Forces' started by The Deterrent, Jan 9, 2011.

  1. Blue Marlin

    Blue Marlin SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    6,741
    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2015
    Ratings:
    +6 / 6,816 / -0
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    fair enough.
    anyway where are my manners.
    :welcome:2:pdf::enjoy:
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  2. SSG commandos

    SSG commandos FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    213
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2015
    Ratings:
    +0 / 63 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan




     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  3. thesameguy

    thesameguy BANNED

    Messages:
    118
    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2015
    Ratings:
    +0 / 109 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    ^^^^ WHERE Is shaheen 3 in the videos?
     
  4. Valorous

    Valorous FULL MEMBER

    New Recruit

    Messages:
    3
    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    is anybody guide us how to upload pictures & videos here
     
  5. The Deterrent

    The Deterrent PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST

    Messages:
    3,174
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Ratings:
    +38 / 6,273 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    COMING UP NEXT

    http://www.paknavy.gov.pk/securite/20151207SEC 375.txt


    Capture.PNG

    Most probably 2nd test flight of Shaheen-III (2750 km range, 578 km apogee).
     
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2015
    • Thanks Thanks x 5
  6. Maarkhoor

    Maarkhoor ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    14,770
    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2015
    Ratings:
    +51 / 23,530 / -7
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
  7. The Deterrent

    The Deterrent PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST

    Messages:
    3,174
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Ratings:
    +38 / 6,273 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Yeah most probably there is a safety buffer area between impact point and the edge of restricted air & naval space. So the test range is same for now.
    However it should NOT be assumed that 2750 km is the maximum possible range of this system, it might be 3000 km but being under-stated to not threaten our friend in the Middle East.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 6
  8. Maarkhoor

    Maarkhoor ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    14,770
    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2015
    Ratings:
    +51 / 23,530 / -7
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    But most of the middle east already under the range but i think Pakistan tries avoid Israeli propaganda to not mention or test full range.

    the assumed diameter and length you can easily estimate the full range which probably 3500 Kms to 4000 kms by using maximum range trajectory .
     
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2015
  9. AUz

    AUz ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    8,028
    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2010
    Ratings:
    +29 / 12,436 / -44
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United States
    That's shouldn't be the case because if you launch Shaheen-III (2750km range) from the Western Balochistan, it can reach Tel Aviv, Haifa, Jerusalem, and even in Mediterranean sea---which means that the system already covers entire Israel in terms of range.

    So why shouldn't we just test the system to its actual maximum range?
     
  10. The Deterrent

    The Deterrent PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST

    Messages:
    3,174
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Ratings:
    +38 / 6,273 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    There are certain operational constraints in launching from the tip of the western horn of Balochistan. Despite the claim by Lt. Gen. Kidwai, Pakistan can strike Andaman & Nicobar only from the south-eastern tip of Sindh (with 2750 km range)...which is again operationally very difficult.

    Testing it at 3000-3200 km would mean that Pakistan has attained the capability to strike from the comfort of its operational mobility space of strategic weapons in the south, anywhere in Balochistan.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 4
  11. rockstar08

    rockstar08 BANNED

    Messages:
    11,117
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2013
    Ratings:
    +16 / 10,962 / -32
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    by reducing the Payload , we can increase the Range right ?
    so technically if we say that with less payload S3 can reach to far end's of ME .. so its not wrong right ?
     
  12. Maarkhoor

    Maarkhoor ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    14,770
    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2015
    Ratings:
    +51 / 23,530 / -7
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Bro that was unnecessary, they will attack you on the same way and thread derailed from the original topic.
     
  13. The Deterrent

    The Deterrent PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST

    Messages:
    3,174
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Ratings:
    +38 / 6,273 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    It doesn't works like that. Warheads and re-entry vehicles are of standard and fixed specifications. They cannot be modified at anybody's wish. Changing any parameter of this magnitude will result in a new variant of the missile, requiring higher than expected R&D.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  14. rockstar08

    rockstar08 BANNED

    Messages:
    11,117
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2013
    Ratings:
    +16 / 10,962 / -32
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    thanks , i learn something new today :)
    appreciated ..
     
  15. AZADPAKISTAN2009

    AZADPAKISTAN2009 ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    30,358
    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Ratings:
    +44 / 30,309 / -2
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    China
    They should have put a Go Pro camera on head of missile for nice view
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2