What's new

Shaheen-3 Missiles 90 Seconds To Delhi

M. Sarmad

SENIOR MEMBER
Oct 27, 2013
5,664
53
9,692
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
It took just 13 days to chop you into 2 halves. You have lost siachin and run back from kargil which your troops occupied through deceit.
What you don't get is what India will do with 200 m more muslims after conquering Pakistan ? The aim is not to conquer but to keep you guys at heel.
The fact remains that you were unable to defeat Pakistan militarily in the western theatre, even in 1971.
As for Siachin and Kargil, India has lost 55% of land area of Jammu and Kashmir since 1947 in different wars.
And as for you saying that India doesn't want to conquer Pakistan, .... You would have done that already if you had the means, to avenge thousand years of slavery and invasions ... But grapes are sour
 

Dark1

BANNED
Feb 29, 2020
1,558
-27
1,046
Country
India
Location
India
The fact remains that you were unable to defeat Pakistan militarily in the western theatre, even in 1971.
As for Siachin and Kargil, India has lost 55% of land area of Jammu and Kashmir since 1947 in different wars.
And as for you saying that India doesn't want to conquer Pakistan, .... You would have done that already if you had the means, to avenge thousand years of slavery and invasions ... But grapes are sour
You are wrong. Its not in our belief system to subjugate others to feel good about ourselves.
Your comment shows your belief system, still mired in adulation of your conquerors.
India has a army solely due to usa's support to Pakistan and China's 62 attack.
Our politicians still treat defence as a unnecessary expenditure , whuch should just muddle through. You guys have a totally different democracy, haha..
 

Windjammer

ELITE MEMBER
Nov 9, 2009
35,220
164
122,776
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
It took just 13 days to chop you into 2 halves. You have lost siachin and run back from kargil which your troops occupied through deceit.
What you don't get is what India will do with 200 m more muslims after conquering Pakistan ? The aim is not to conquer but to keep you guys at heel.
First learn to fight your own wars, in 1971 you needed Muktis to rub your backsides and if it wasn't for US and Israel , in Kargil, we would have squashed you like a wormy Apple and not forgetting 2002, when no one came to help, you ran with tail between legs after sitting on the border for 12 months.
And lately you were again crying to America for getting penetrated by an AMRAAM.
 

M. Sarmad

SENIOR MEMBER
Oct 27, 2013
5,664
53
9,692
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
You are wrong. Its not in our belief system to subjugate others to feel good about ourselves.
Your comment shows your belief system, still mired in adulation of your conquerors.
India has a army solely due to usa's support to Pakistan and China's 62 attack.
Our politicians still treat defence as a unnecessary expenditure , whuch should just muddle through. You guys have a totally different democracy, haha..
The way you guys lynch religious minorities in India (for even eating beef!) pretty much tells the word about your belief system, your deep lying insecurities, religious hatred and your will to subjugate others. So, Let's not discuss that

As for your lie regarding why India has an army, In 1996 was published a Note Indian Prime Minister Nehru had written to Sheikh Abdullah on 25 August 1952 from Sonamarg in Kashmir. It is a document of cardinal importance. It laid bare Nehru’s entire approach to the questions; his strategy and tactics. He revealed that “towards the end of 1948” he concluded that “there were only two possibilities open to us, continuance of the war in a limited way; (2) some kind of a settlement on the basis of the existing military situation”. He had accepted the UNCIP resolutions to get a ceasefire; not to hold a plebiscite. “We are superior to Pakistan in military and industrial power,” With the passage of time Pakistan will “accept a settlement which we consider fair, whether in Kashmir or elsewhere”. [Selected Works of Jawaharlal Nehru, vol. 19, pp.322-330. ed. S. Gopal, Nehru Memorial Fund, OUP, Second Series.]

^^ You were relying on military power from day 1. Who are you trying to fool ?
 

Dark1

BANNED
Feb 29, 2020
1,558
-27
1,046
Country
India
Location
India
The way you guys lynch religious minorities in India (for even eating beef!) pretty much tells the word about your belief system, your deep lying insecurities, religious hatred and your will to subjugate others. So, Let's not discuss that

As for your lie regarding why India has an army, In 1996 was published a Note Indian Prime Minister Nehru had written to Sheikh Abdullah on 25 August 1952 from Sonamarg in Kashmir. It is a document of cardinal importance. It laid bare Nehru’s entire approach to the questions; his strategy and tactics. He revealed that “towards the end of 1948” he concluded that “there were only two possibilities open to us, continuance of the war in a limited way; (2) some kind of a settlement on the basis of the existing military situation”. He had accepted the UNCIP resolutions to get a ceasefire; not to hold a plebiscite. “We are superior to Pakistan in military and industrial power,” With the passage of time Pakistan will “accept a settlement which we consider fair, whether in Kashmir or elsewhere”. [Selected Works of Jawaharlal Nehru, vol. 19, pp.322-330. ed. S. Gopal, Nehru Memorial Fund, OUP, Second Series.]

^^ You were relying on military power from day 1. Who are you trying to fool ?
You have been given a brain, use it.
Mob violence is a issue but a overblown one. You guys finish off more ahmedias , shias and hazaras in a week time , what these cow lynchings cannot match in 4 years.
Nehru was a famous pacifist who didnt invest in the army until after the 62 war.
In 65 Pakistan started the war , armed with sophisticated American tanks and jets , trying to replicate the Chinese and take advantage of nehru's death.
And how is nehru advocating a fair settlement a negative ? Its Pakistan's obsession with the Kashmir land which is the problem.
And now with imran eyeing undisputed areas in Gujarat, the Pakistani obsession is laid bare.
Its not about kashmir, its a inferiority complex. Trying to stay relevant by picking conflicts with a successful neighbor
 

Zarvan

ELITE MEMBER
Apr 28, 2011
50,785
81
56,283
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
According to experts, Pakistan's Shaheen-3 Missile which was test fired today, covers all of India and will reach Delhi in 90 Seconds and can hit Mumbai in 4 Minutes.

View attachment 708755
View attachment 708754
Pakistan should work on developing nuclear warheads of at least 250 KT. And have at least 250 of those war heads.

But that is to make sure we don't go to war but if war takes place. Our first and foremost strategy should be to fight a conventional war. And for that we should produce long range land attack cruise missiles with range of 1600 to 2400 KM. Which can be fired both from Land as well as sea. Carry out long range strikes with conventional weapons will be key to win the war without going nuclear.
 

AUz

ELITE MEMBER
Sep 14, 2010
8,485
-12
14,541
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
It took just 13 days to chop you into 2 halves. You have lost siachin and run back from kargil which your troops occupied through deceit.
What you don't get is what India will do with 200 m more muslims after conquering Pakistan ? The aim is not to conquer but to keep you guys at heel.
71 War from Hindu-Muslim strategic perspective 3-1.png
71 War from Hindu-Muslim strategic perspective 3-2.png
 

GumNaam

ELITE MEMBER
Sep 23, 2016
9,396
-2
12,014
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
It took just 13 days to chop you into 2 halves. You have lost siachin and run back from kargil which your troops occupied through deceit.
What you don't get is what India will do with 200 m more muslims after conquering Pakistan ? The aim is not to conquer but to keep you guys at heel.
irrelevant what your aim is for its a foregone conclusion that india can't even manage a country the size is sri lanka let alone conquer a power like Pakistan. here, I'll ruin your pms induced wet dreams:
your self proclaimed 13 day victory was actually a result of 8 months of fighting with the majority of Pakistani population in the east with a crooked little manipulative thug sitting in the west who actually WANTED east Pakistan to break away cuz if it hadn't, he would've never become the PM & would've had to bow out to either mujeeb or another bengali. yes we lost, but to east Pakistan, not to you. you were merely used & tossed away by a nation that is now growing at a faster rate than you & is well on its way to becoming China's base right on your chicken's neck. as for the western front, your dismal performance speaks for itself where you couldn't gain or retain anything in spite of our forces being halved. here it from on of your:

you really should not tout your failures in siachin as a victory since it was merely the first step in your army's grand plan to occupy GB/AJK when Pakistan Army was fully occupied on the afghan border. but alas, holding true to your traditions of innate ineptitude & incompetence, your inept indian army couldn't even consolidate the first step in its grand plan. and now you've been stuck in frozen barren waste land...ab achay say baith kay kulfia'an hugo! :lol:

and kargil? once again...listen to your own gowdi media:

listen dude, honestly I feel sorry for you. your trying to act like a big, bad *** while your bharat mata is being systematically dismantled by China, small nations like Nepal don't even give you the time of the day, Pakistan violates you across the loc at will. All this is happening as we speak. I literally feel bad on pointing all this out to you & ruining your self inflated bravado. this here is what you really are:
^^^ this monkey is one of your own. yeh hay tumhari auqaat. dear boy, there is only one power in our geographical region that is capable of doing the conquering & that power in Pakistan, not you monkeys. We don't put it into practice because we don't want to, not because we can't. apni auqaat may raho, zinda raho. sincere advice.
 

IceCold

PDF VETERAN
May 1, 2007
16,508
8
19,473
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Ok.
You are a 200 m strong population. What exactly does the world look at Pakistan and expect except the negative ? Think what Pakistan is contributing to the world except the obvious ?
After 75 years of existence, without the abject poverty and famines that India had , the biggest achievements Pakistan celebrates nowadays is another successful loan !
You guys have stopped competing with India and now just use China as a example.
After 75 years , your biggest success is not being fully dissolved as a nation. In all human development lists, Pakistan is in the last 5 un the world.
Travel a bit and discover the true value your green passport attracts in the ports of arrival.
Their is a world outside pdf.
You must be living under a rock or infused with Godi Media. In the real world outside Godi Media, pakistan is shown as this:
https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk...-to-celebrate-pakistan-strategy-day-tomorrow/
While our PM was a key note speaker at various international platforms from climate change to WHO, where exactly was modi? Lol
Thats just two years of someone working for Pakistan, wait few more years and than we will talk.
 

Khan vilatey

FULL MEMBER
Feb 11, 2020
963
2
942
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
We all do know that there will never be a nuclear exchange between us and the fact that India can no longer fight a conventional war with Pakistan. This happened in 1982. We have 50% parity with India

k
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom