• Saturday, August 8, 2020

SC takes notice of 'objectionable content' on YouTube, other social media platforms

Discussion in 'Insaf - Justice' started by Ivan, Jul 22, 2020.

  1. Ivan

    Ivan FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    550
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2015
    Ratings:
    +2 / 846 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Haseeb Bhatti
    Updated 22 Jul, 2020

    [​IMG]
    The Supreme Court on Wednesday took notice of "objectionable content" on YouTube and other social media and issued notices to the Foreign Office and the Attorney General in this regard. — AFP/File

    The Supreme Court on Wednesday took notice of "objectionable content" being shared on YouTube and other social media platforms, and issued notices to the Foreign Office and the Attorney General in this regard.

    A three-member bench, comprising Justice Mushir Alam, Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed and Justice Aminud Din Khan, took notice during a hearing on a bail petition of a man accused of a sectarian crime.

    During the hearing, Justice Amin remarked that the public had a right to comment on the judiciary's performance and judgements but social media "did not even spare their families and shamed the judges".

    "They become 'uncles' on social media and incite people against the Pakistan Army, judiciary and government," he said, adding that the judiciary "has no objection to the right to freedom of speech".


    "Our salaries come from the public's money, [but] the Constitution gives us the right to our private lives."

    Justice Amin said that the top court had announced a judgement on a case a day earlier which was then discussed on YouTube. "We are showing patience [but] this has to come to an end."

    Justice Amin questioned whether the Federal Investigation Agency and the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) had seen what was happening on YouTube. "
    There are several countries where YouTube is banned. Try uploading content against America and the European Union," he said.

    Justice Alam observed that "many countries control social media through local laws".

    PTA authorities, present in court, replied that they could not remove "individual content but could only report it".

    Following notices to the AG and Foreign office, the hearing was adjourned for an indefinite period.

    The top court last week took suo motu notice of an alleged contemptuous tweet by journalist Mateeullah Jan. A Supreme Court bench, comprising Chief Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Justice Alam and Justice Ijazul Ahsan, had issued notices to the attorney general, Jan and president of the Supreme Court of Bar Association. During today's hearing, Jan was given more time to submit his reply.

    Earlier this month, the Supreme Court formally charged Rawalpindi-based cleric Mirza Iftikharuddin with contempt of court by delivering a derogatory and scandalous speech against the judiciary which went viral on social media.

    The court indicted the cleric under Section 5 of the Contempt of the Court Ordinance 2003 after rejecting his unconditional apology he tendered for making an objectionable speech in a private meeting in which he had hurled abusive language at Justice Qazi Faez Isa of the Supreme Court as well as the institution of judiciary.
     
  2. El Sidd

    El Sidd ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    53,359
    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2017
    Ratings:
    +21 / 44,061 / -13
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Canada
    Do you know why PDF did not advocate for carpet bombing of them?

    Or made a thread about radicalisation?

    Or tried painting it some serious national threat or terrorism?

    Its all in the name honey. All in the name
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  3. Yaseen1

    Yaseen1 ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    9,251
    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2014
    Ratings:
    +3 / 8,365 / -8
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    youtube works on majority reporting,if any such video is reported by large number of viewers then algorithm of youtube automatically blocks content, it not work on direction of sc,if sc want such type of media they should ask govt to develop own youtube like platform instead of giving orders which are not within scope of authority as in u.s twitter has deleted tweets of trump which indicates that it is not so easy to control these media platforms
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  4. Ivan

    Ivan FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    550
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2015
    Ratings:
    +2 / 846 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    I am shocked at this frenzy of blocking all these digital platforms under different pretexts.
     
  5. Imran Khan

    Imran Khan PDF VETERAN

    Messages:
    54,713
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2007
    Ratings:
    +58 / 104,277 / -39
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    We need new judges .those whom kniw what social media is
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  6. Safriz

    Safriz BANNED

    Messages:
    20,857
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2010
    Ratings:
    +6 / 11,085 / -7
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    When will SC start doing their actual job and take notice of the 32000 pending cases in the SC alone and another 2 million in Pakistan judicial system?
    Stop this daily drama
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1