What's new

SC moved for referendum on presidential form of govt

AZ1

SENIOR MEMBER
Jul 25, 2017
5,911
1
5,706
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
ISLAMABAD: The whispering campaign for introducing the presidential form of government in the country has finally reached the Supreme Court through a petition that requires Prime Minister Imran Khan to hold a nation-wide referendum and pave the way for introducing the presidential system to replace the existing parliamentary one.
The referendum should be held by the prime minister only after seeking due approval from a joint sitting of the parliament, suggested the petition, which was moved by one Tahir Aziz Khan who heads a less-known and recently formed, Hum Awam Pakistan party, as chairman, by invoking Article 184(3) of the Constitution that deals with the apex court’s authority to enforce fundamental rights of the citizens.
The petition claims that the fundamental rights of the people provided under Chapter 1 of Part II of the Constitution were being infringed upon by the failure of the present parliamentary form of the government to deliver for their welfare and wellbeing and progress in different fields of life.
It is, therefore, in the interest of justice that the people be given a fair chance to choose presidential form of government if they want so, the petition pleads.
The poor condition of masses of Pakistan directly reflects upon the system of the government in Pakistan since the parliamentary system has utterly failed, it says, adding as of March 2020 the public debt of Pakistan was estimated to be about Rs42.8 trillion or $256 billion.
After citing dismal figures of the country’s huge financial burden in terms of external debt and liabilities towards the International Monetary Fund (IMF), besides HDI (Human Development Index) and GDP, it criticises its parliamentary system for shifting political loyalties of the parliamentarians who “blackmail and pressurise the government to promote their own personal interests”. It is for this reason that often a healthy opposition and a strong government cannot emerge to take care of the welfare and wellbeing of the people, it argues.
The petition also deplores “a little legislation” in the assemblies, frequent shortage of quorum in the legislatures and a compromised role of the opposition.
Moreover, it states there is no system of separation of powers between the executive and the legislature, terming it the principal cause of politicisation of the administration, non-professionalism, nepotism and corruption.
It also regrets what it calls lack of merit in postings on sensitive positions saying such appointments are often made to win over the members of the opposition and allies of the government.
While the executive head and his ministers are not always competent, since the selection of the cabinet members has to be made from members of the parliament, the National Assembly or the Senate, competent people are not often available to improve the quality of governance, the petition says.
It advocates the presidential system saying it best suits the country because in exercising his powers, the president requires no help from the parliament to implement his agenda. Thus the presidential form of democracy puts the decision- making process on a fast track, it says.
The petition also cited examples of the countries which have made a lot of progress by switching over to the presidential form. In this connection it cites Turkey’s example where a constitutional referendum was held on April 16, 2017 on whether the office of the prime minister would be abolished and the existing parliamentary form be replaced with an executive presidency.
Likewise, it quotes France as a model, where a popular referendum was held on Sept 28, 1958 which approved the constitution of the Fifth Republic, replacing the French Parliamentary Republic with a presidential form of government.
It also refers to Iran having a “successful presidential system” since 1979. The country, it says, made a lot of progress despite sanctions by the United States and the United Nations and is “far ahead of Pakistan financially and politically”. Indonesia, Russia and Chinaare all now developed countries because they have adopted presidential form of government, it argues. It is apparent from the media as well as the social media that an overwhelming majority of Pakistanis was fed up with the parliamentary form of government and want to adopt a presidential one, the petition claims.
Published in Dawn, August 28th, 2020
 
Apr 22, 2019
3,503
-26
5,351
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
Interesting. Not sure how it will make any difference.

You will still have to fight elections, opposition parties and hundreds of parliamentarians.
 

TNT

SENIOR MEMBER
Jun 2, 2019
3,242
0
5,012
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
A presidential system is best. The national assembly members would then focus on legislation and oversight committees instead of lobbying for ministries. It will also end the trend of spending millions on every seat and manipulating members to change sides. The elite class will not see much financial benefit in being a member of assembly and slowly educated middle class will come in. The power of president and that of assembly needs to be clearly defined though. We need an american type distribution of power between Whitehouse and congress.
 

hussain0216

ELITE MEMBER
May 29, 2012
15,200
-19
20,079
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
Current system is a utter failure

We need change ASAP


We can't do the same stupid thing over and over again we as a country need change desperately and try another system
 

HAIDER

ELITE MEMBER
May 21, 2006
23,199
13
22,650
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
After 18th amendment, present system is total failed.... President system must be good choice, atleast President work without any pressure from groups..
 

Longhorn

FULL MEMBER
Feb 22, 2019
1,891
1
2,880
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
It's already been decided that we are having a presidential system.
This is just the first formality in a process with a predetermined outcome.
 

saiyan0321

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
Jan 9, 2012
6,413
101
9,285
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Useless endeavor. The lawyer couldnt care less since if the case gets media highlight, his graph will increase and this is exactly what the president of the party, that is filing the petition is doing as well. Get some fame under his wing. There was a petition filed before as well and it was dismissed. The points in the plaint are breaking every single rule of writing a plaint and he did exactly what they asked to not do.

Any lawyer with an iota of legal sense would understand why parliamentary system cannot be removed from Pakistan. The most they were able to do was create a semi-presidential system and there is a reason even dictators had to form parliaments.

Nothing but media highlight
 

HaMoTZeMaS

FULL MEMBER
Jan 21, 2020
414
1
473
Country
Pakistan
Location
Saudi Arabia
le
Useless endeavor. The lawyer couldnt care less since if the case gets media highlight, his graph will increase and this is exactly what the president of the party, that is filing the petition is doing as well. Get some fame under his wing. There was a petition filed before as well and it was dismissed. The points in the plaint are breaking every single rule of writing a plaint and he did exactly what they asked to not do.

Any lawyer with an iota of legal sense would understand why parliamentary system cannot be removed from Pakistan. The most they were able to do was create a semi-presidential system and there is a reason even dictators had to form parliaments.

Nothing but media highlight
Lets see hat happens this tim
 

Enigma SIG

SENIOR MEMBER
Feb 20, 2009
2,932
1
3,309
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Why vote once in 5 years when you can vote on your issues daily? Modern problems require modern solutions. Parliament/Senate is obsolete.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Top