The assumption here is that any sort of "moral stance on Kashmir" has achieved anything substantive for Kashmir or its people. In reality, a "moral stance" is purely for optics and media narrative building. Pakistan has only achieved anything for Kashmir through brute force and an ongoing threat of force. Nobody will bat an eyelid if an army brushes aside a native people and replaces them through conquest. We have seen it in recent times with Russia in Ukraine/Georgia, then again between Armenia and Azerbaijan. India will do the same if given the chance, regardless of either the UN or our moral consistency or inconsistency. All that is keeping them out of Free Kashmir is the blood of our soldiers. We drove the Indians out in 1947 through strength, not because someone took pity on our moral stance. The rest of Kashmir must also be liberated by force alone. The moral argument is certainly needed but only to sustain optics.Pakistan WILL NOT accept Israel as a STATE, regardless of what position the Saudi's take.
If we accept Isreal, we lose all moral stance on Kashmir.