• Monday, January 27, 2020

Russian Land Forces can smash the British army

Discussion in 'Military Forum' started by Bogeyman, Nov 28, 2019.

  1. vostok

    vostok PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST

    Messages:
    9,102
    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Ratings:
    +27 / 15,501 / -0
    Country:
    Russian Federation
    Location:
    Ukraine
    Of course Russia can smash British army and probably the whole West combined. But why should it? It is the West who throughout history attacked Russia not vice versa. Western Europe has no resources wich Russia lacks, Russia has plenty resources West lacks.
    It is like thinking "army of Cuba can smash army of Solomon islands". May be it can. But what for?
     
    Last edited: Dec 1, 2019
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  2. Bogeyman

    Bogeyman FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    278
    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2019
    Ratings:
    +0 / 459 / -0
    Country:
    Turkey
    Location:
    Turkey
    Having the ability to accomplish a job does not require using it. However, the ability to accomplish a job is used as a deterrent in international relations.
    This is called showing strength. If you show your muscles, you're not an easy bite. Exercises are like a gorilla's demonstration of power. However, not every demonstration of power does not indicate war. Intimidation and threat is given in this way. As can be seen, diplomacy has its own way of language.
    For example, if Turkey will do about 1500 km range ballistic missile exercise was ringing alarm bells in the neighboring countries.
     
  3. Georg

    Georg FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,176
    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2017
    Ratings:
    +3 / 1,315 / -1
    Country:
    Germany
    Location:
    Spain
    they were never able to do it...
     
  4. fitpOsitive

    fitpOsitive SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    6,509
    Joined:
    May 27, 2015
    Ratings:
    +13 / 6,270 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Russia ............................................................and ................................................................UK. :undecided:

    Am I missing something?
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  5. POTTER

    POTTER FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    424
    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2019
    Ratings:
    +1 / 571 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Germans and Soviets were LEGENDS. :-)
     
  6. vostok

    vostok PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST

    Messages:
    9,102
    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Ratings:
    +27 / 15,501 / -0
    Country:
    Russian Federation
    Location:
    Ukraine
    Western Europe? Socialist armies without USSR could easily win Western pussies without any help from USSR. I suppose single Eastern Germany could defeat half of Western Europe.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  7. Georg

    Georg FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,176
    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2017
    Ratings:
    +3 / 1,315 / -1
    Country:
    Germany
    Location:
    Spain
    the ammout of bullcrap people belife on this forum is amazing...
    1. quantity is at a given point a burden not a plus... the supply lines would have collapesed in a vew days leaving the huge Army stranded without fuel and supply... the USSR experiende that in 1941 as the giant Read Army got toasted by the Wehrmacht with not even a quater of the equipment.. they lost 11.800 tanks in the first 18 days and 22.000tanks in less than 6 months
    2. the western european are as pussys than the east europeans... or explain me the different between a east german guy and a west german guy in the 1960´s, 70´s or 80´s ...we had the advantage of far less alcohol problems in the troops
    3. any attack in the cold war would have ended in a atomic strike which would have ended human history
     
  8. vostok

    vostok PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST

    Messages:
    9,102
    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Ratings:
    +27 / 15,501 / -0
    Country:
    Russian Federation
    Location:
    Ukraine
    1. Supply lines in tiny Western Europe is not the same as in USSR. It is quite easy to supply equipment from Berlin to French coast.
    2. Western Europeans are pussies with no fight spirit you even can do nothing with migrants. If an army would came into Western countries - it would be even 10 times easier than in WW2. All of your liberal politics would surrender just for the sake of save people's life - because that is what you become you can not sacrifice your lifes for the Motherland. Eastern Germany army was high motivated army with true Prussian spirit remains both in combat training and moral. Western Germany army is a joke leading by a woman.
    3. I am agree with that.
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2019
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  9. Indus Pakistan

    Indus Pakistan ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    16,423
    Joined:
    May 7, 2012
    Ratings:
    +188 / 45,666 / -9
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Britain is fine. Long before the Russkies get to London for tea with the Queen they got to tear through all of Europe giving time for Yanks to get the privilage of protecting us. So no worries. Let Russia do what it does best. Produce class A Vodka and class A+++ whores.
     
  10. Zarvan

    Zarvan ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    47,919
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Ratings:
    +84 / 49,871 / -13
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Britain needs to have around 120000 size Army at least. That should be the minimum number. What they have right now is a disaster in the making.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  11. Ziggy1977

    Ziggy1977 FULL MEMBER

    New Recruit

    Messages:
    38
    Joined:
    May 3, 2019
    Ratings:
    +0 / 12 / -0
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    why do they need a 120,000 army. they currently have a total army of 108,500. what would a extra 11,500 soldiers do? what type of soldiers (jobs) would they have?
     
  12. KAL-EL

    KAL-EL PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST

    Messages:
    4,215
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2013
    Ratings:
    +7 / 6,773 / -0
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    Especially because they are a nuclear power (tactical nukes included) And have second-strike capability as far as I know.

    Will one nuclear power, invade another nuclear power? I don’t think so..

    Specially when large troop movements will be discovered long before they actually make land.

    Russian troops invading the UK would be a doomsday event imho

    This ^^^^
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  13. James David

    James David PROFESSIONAL

    Messages:
    575
    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2015
    Ratings:
    +1 / 807 / -0
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    Ivan's touch our Red Coat cousins we wipe 'em all out.

    Tea anyone?

    [​IMG]