What's new

Reconstructing the American coup. ( Role of local collaborators the local collaborators).

Patriot forever

SENIOR MEMBER
Jun 2, 2020
3,375
5
7,339
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
June 6 ( The major instigator)

CIA chief Burns visits Pakistan and is refused bases. IK refuses to meet CIA chief aswell.



June 9.

IK says absolutely not in axios interview.



PHASE 1.

September 7.


Major transfers and postings in army.

Many names are connected especially a specific name coming again and again in relation to managing courts.



October 6. (The last key phase 1 and extremely critical as mentioned by IK)

DG ISI changed.

1651844432327.png

1651833461264.png





PHASE 2. ( Cannot happen without the completion of phase 1 especially DG ISI )

October 15.


American Charge of Affairs in Pakistan meets Shehbaz Sharif and Maryam Nawaz in a single day. The coming days/months showed extraordinary meetings at a rapid pace of Americans embassy staff in Pakistan with local law makers especially munharif arakeen of no importance ( probably the first such interaction with the likes of noor alam khan and Raja Riaz etc)

October 23.

US nearing a formal agreement. IK the roadblock.








Feb 24. ( The last nail )

PM Imran Khan Russia visit.



March 8 / March 27 ( disclosed to public) cipher / meeting minutes.

Clearly mentioned Vote of no confidence in advance. A direct interference/threat communicated.

'If IK is not removed than there will be consequences and if VONC succeeds than all will be forgiven'.
'We will take the issue head on'.

( IK made the scapegoat as later on it was admitted that he took Bajwa in confidence but he was mentioned as the sole character responsible for Russia visit)

March 16.

Shehbaz Sharif, PM IK should not have said absolutely not.



March 29.

Asad umar press conference. Letter contents. ( NAWAZ sharif involvement)


Maryam Nawaz and Rana Sanaullah accept that NAWAZ sharif holding meetings outside.

( Nawaz Sharif was the major player).


I will review this post and will be adding further events in the timeline.
 
Last edited:

R Wing

SENIOR MEMBER
May 23, 2016
3,232
10
5,181
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
June 6

CIA chief Burns visits Pakistan and is refused bases. IK refuses to meet CIA chief aswell.



June 9.

IK says absolutely not in axios interview.



PHASE 1.

September 7.


Major transfers and postings in army.



October 6. (The last key phase 1 and extremely critical as mentioned by IK)

DG ISI changed.




PHASE 2. ( Cannot happen without the completion of phase 1 especially DG ISI )

October 15.


American Charge of Affairs in Pakistan meets Shehbaz Sharif and Maryam Nawaz in a single day. The coming days/months showed extraordinary meetings at a rapid pace of Americans embassy staff in Pakistan with local law makers especially munharif arakeen of no importance ( probably the first such interaction with the likes of noor alam khan and Raja Riaz etc)

October 23.

US nearing a formal agreement. IK the roadblock.








Feb 24. ( The last nail )

PM Imran Khan Russia visit.



March 8 / March 27 ( disclosed to public) cipher / meeting minutes.

Clearly mentioned Vote of no confidence in advance. A direct interference/threat communicated.

'If IK is not removed than there will be consequences and if VONC succeeds than all will be forgiven'.
'We will take the issue head on'.

( IK made the scapegoat as later on it was admitted that he took Bajwa in confidence but he was mentioned as the sole character responsible for Russia visit)

March 16.

Shehbaz Sharif, PM IK should not have said absolutely not.



March 29.

Asad umar press conference. Letter contents. ( NAWAZ sharif involvement)


Maryam Nawaz and Rana Sanaullah accept that NAWAZ sharif holding meetings outside.

( Nawaz Sharif was the major player).


I will review this post and will be adding further events in the timeline.

Perhaps the following event should be added to the timeline as it sealed the deal of what was going on behind the scenes:

Somebody publicly saying that the Russian invasion of Ukraine was terrible and should be condemned etc in a closely watched and internationally-reported forum at a time when the official govt position was of being publicly neutral since closer/balanced ties with Russia were being cultivated by the PTI govt.
 

War Thunder

SENIOR MEMBER
Mar 12, 2013
4,008
8
5,624
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Arab Emirates
COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED WITHOUT MILITARY ESTABLISHMENT CONNIVANCE.
This is the reason they are so vehemently opposing NO CONSPIRACY but BLATANT INTERFERENCE.
Agreeing to conspiracy means they are testifying against themselves.

The whole system worked to bring down PMIK.

It is a TRUE Case for severe sedition and Article 6.

An Eedogan like punishment to all those involved. It could only happen after elections. But with this level of collusion between the State of Pakistan and foreign power, they will go to any extreme.

ومكرو و مكرالله ان الله خير المكرين



Don't worry.
A day will come when bodies of all traitors of the nation will hang on the highways.
There is no other way to fix our country and free it from the shackles of American slavery.
Everything else has been tried and failed.
 

nangyale

SENIOR MEMBER
May 31, 2010
2,148
10
1,964
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED WITHOUT MILITARY ESTABLISHMENT CONNIVANCE.
This is the reason they are so vehemently opposing NO CONSPIRACY but BLATANT INTERFERENCE.
Agreeing to conspiracy means they are testifying against themselves.

The whole system worked to bring down PMIK.

It is a TRUE Case for severe sedition and Article 6.

An Eedogan like punishment to all those involved. It could only happen after elections. But with this level of collusion between the State of Pakistan and foreign power, they will go to any extreme.

ومكرو و مكرالله ان الله خير المكرين
Actually I would say that the most important part player in this conspiracy was General Bajwa.

It's a shame that everyone can see that Pak Army is lead by a traitor today, yet no body has the courage to say so.

The silence is defeaning, and censorship disheartening, including on this forum.
 

nangyale

SENIOR MEMBER
May 31, 2010
2,148
10
1,964
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
I do agree.
Name for a traitor is traitor, not Chaudhary Wafadar Bajwa.
Per Justice Muneer, a successful revolution is legit in its nature. It is to be seen if majority of the Corps commanders join hand and make Gen Bajwa face allegations.
One can only hope.

But I believe most of the corps commanders are on the one hand threatened and bullyied by isi, while at the same time cajoled not to go against the chain of command. Bajwa declaring that he is not going to take another extension is also part of this ploy.
 

ziaulislam

ELITE MEMBER
Apr 22, 2010
18,486
10
19,202
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
June 6 ( The major instigator)

CIA chief Burns visits Pakistan and is refused bases. IK refuses to meet CIA chief aswell.



June 9.

IK says absolutely not in axios interview.



PHASE 1.

September 7.


Major transfers and postings in army.

Many names are connected especially a specific name coming again and again in relation to managing courts.



October 6. (The last key phase 1 and extremely critical as mentioned by IK)

DG ISI changed.

View attachment 841365
View attachment 841321




PHASE 2. ( Cannot happen without the completion of phase 1 especially DG ISI )

October 15.


American Charge of Affairs in Pakistan meets Shehbaz Sharif and Maryam Nawaz in a single day. The coming days/months showed extraordinary meetings at a rapid pace of Americans embassy staff in Pakistan with local law makers especially munharif arakeen of no importance ( probably the first such interaction with the likes of noor alam khan and Raja Riaz etc)

October 23.

US nearing a formal agreement. IK the roadblock.








Feb 24. ( The last nail )

PM Imran Khan Russia visit.



March 8 / March 27 ( disclosed to public) cipher / meeting minutes.

Clearly mentioned Vote of no confidence in advance. A direct interference/threat communicated.

'If IK is not removed than there will be consequences and if VONC succeeds than all will be forgiven'.
'We will take the issue head on'.

( IK made the scapegoat as later on it was admitted that he took Bajwa in confidence but he was mentioned as the sole character responsible for Russia visit)

March 16.

Shehbaz Sharif, PM IK should not have said absolutely not.



March 29.

Asad umar press conference. Letter contents. ( NAWAZ sharif involvement)


Maryam Nawaz and Rana Sanaullah accept that NAWAZ sharif holding meetings outside.

( Nawaz Sharif was the major player).


I will review this post and will be adding further events in the timeline.
Half of the population disagrees with you
Hence no coup
 

Pakistan Ka Beta

SENIOR MEMBER
Aug 7, 2019
2,497
5
6,773
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Where Bajwa going to live after retirement?
He will face song of CHOR, CHOR, CHIR, ...
He is seeking 1 yesr extension for a Temporary safety.
In which country spy chief meets foreign country ambassadors???
June 6 ( The major instigator)

CIA chief Burns visits Pakistan and is refused bases. IK refuses to meet CIA chief aswell.



June 9.

IK says absolutely not in axios interview.



PHASE 1.

September 7.


Major transfers and postings in army.

Many names are connected especially a specific name coming again and again in relation to managing courts.



October 6. (The last key phase 1 and extremely critical as mentioned by IK)

DG ISI changed.

View attachment 841365
View attachment 841321




PHASE 2. ( Cannot happen without the completion of phase 1 especially DG ISI )

October 15.


American Charge of Affairs in Pakistan meets Shehbaz Sharif and Maryam Nawaz in a single day. The coming days/months showed extraordinary meetings at a rapid pace of Americans embassy staff in Pakistan with local law makers especially munharif arakeen of no importance ( probably the first such interaction with the likes of noor alam khan and Raja Riaz etc)

October 23.

US nearing a formal agreement. IK the roadblock.








Feb 24. ( The last nail )

PM Imran Khan Russia visit.



March 8 / March 27 ( disclosed to public) cipher / meeting minutes.

Clearly mentioned Vote of no confidence in advance. A direct interference/threat communicated.

'If IK is not removed than there will be consequences and if VONC succeeds than all will be forgiven'.
'We will take the issue head on'.

( IK made the scapegoat as later on it was admitted that he took Bajwa in confidence but he was mentioned as the sole character responsible for Russia visit)

March 16.

Shehbaz Sharif, PM IK should not have said absolutely not.



March 29.

Asad umar press conference. Letter contents. ( NAWAZ sharif involvement)


Maryam Nawaz and Rana Sanaullah accept that NAWAZ sharif holding meetings outside.

( Nawaz Sharif was the major player).


I will review this post and will be adding further events in the timeline.

are u guys blind >>> this pic is from Command and Staff college where ambassadors and diplomats come and deliver a lecture . check command and staff college flag and then check above flag , check names of commanders of command and staff college and check is there LT Gen Nadeem name there ???? >>>> BIG Yes .
 

VCheng

ELITE MEMBER
Sep 29, 2010
42,971
55
36,388
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
CIA chief Burns visits Pakistan and is refused bases.

LOL. There was NO US request for any bases. In fact, PMIK was told to stop claiming otherwise by his own FM. :D

IK says absolutely not in axios interview.

Double LOL. That was a hypothetical question by a journalist looking for a soundbite: "IF bases are requested..." and PMIK fell for the bait. :D
 

Olympus81

FULL MEMBER
Apr 18, 2022
626
1
938
Country
Thailand
Location
Thailand
Thats a good timeline.

Please add the following
- Bajwa secret meeting with Nawaz
- Hussain Haqqani meeting with Nawaz
- Bilawal trip to US where he went off the radar
 

imadul

SENIOR MEMBER
Dec 7, 2007
2,194
0
2,785
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
LOL. There was NO US request for any bases. In fact, PMIK was told to stop claiming otherwise by his own FM. :D



Double LOL. That was a hypothetical question by a journalist looking for a soundbite: "IF bases are requested..." and PMIK fell for the bait. :D
You are wrong.
There were successive reports in us Pak media about US initiated talks about bases.
There is a thing called GOOGLE which usually can do this kind of job - finding information.
 
Last edited:

Burger_King

MEMBER

New Recruit

Jul 18, 2014
42
0
114
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom

Patriot forever

SENIOR MEMBER
Jun 2, 2020
3,375
5
7,339
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
LOL. There was NO US request for any bases. In fact, PMIK was told to stop claiming otherwise by his own FM..

CIA chief told drone bases won’t be hosted

Baqir Sajjad SyedPublished June 9, 2021

CIA Director William Burns testifies during a Senate Select Committee on Intelligence hearing about worldwide threats, on Capitol Hill in Washington on April 14. — Reuters

CIA Director William Burns testifies during a Senate Select Committee on Intelligence hearing about worldwide threats, on Capitol Hill in Washington on April 14. — Reuters
ISLAMABAD: Government officials have privately begun confirming a secret visit to Islamabad of CIA Director William Burns and are suggesting that he was firmly told that Pakistan would not host the spy agency’s drone bases on its territory.
This comes after New York Times in an article published on June 6 claimed that Mr Burns had travelled to Pakistan for meetings with Army Chief Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa and ISI Director General Lt Gen Faiz Hamid to explore the possibility of counterterrorism cooperation between the two sides.
Read: US-Pakistan talks on military bases reach impasse: report
The Central Intelligence Agency is said to be looking for bases around Afghanistan from where it could gather intelligence on Afghanistan and execute counterterrorism strikes after the completion of troop withdrawal from there.
Meanwhile, US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan, in response to a question about the US seeking a drone base in Pakistan, said: “We have had constructive discussions in the military, intelligence and diplomatic channels with Pakistan about the future of America’s capabilities to ensure that Afghanistan never again becomes a base from which Al Qaeda rises or any other terrorist group can attack the United States.”
Although the exact date of the CIA director’s hours-long trip has not been disclosed by either side, it is believed to have taken place in late April.
William Burns ‘secretly’ visited Islamabad to explore possibility of counterterrorism cooperation
The purpose of quietly sharing of information by the Pakistani officials with select journalists at this stage apparently looked to dispel the impression that the two sides were engaged in negotiations on hosting of US drone bases by Pakistan.
New York Times article had at one point said that American officials believed that Pakistan wanted to allow the US to access a base. But, it indicated that Pakistani officials were setting very stringent conditions.
“In discussions between American and Pakistani officials, the Pakistanis have demanded a variety of restrictions in exchange for the use of a base in the country, and they have effectively required that they sign off on any targets that either the CIA or the military would want to hit inside Afghanistan, according to three Americans familiar with the discussions,” as per the article.
Discussions between Pakistan and the US on this issue over the past few weeks have taken place at multiple levels — between Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi and Secretary of State Antony Blinken, NSA Moeed Yusuf and his American counterpart Jake Sullivan, Gen Bajwa and Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin, COAS/DG ISI and CIA chief, and the army chief and the US charge d’affaires.
Officials said the CIA chief wanted to meet Prime Minister Imran Khan, but was plainly told that only counterpart meeting between heads of government of the two countries was possible.
The government’s insistence on counterpart meeting also stems from its anger over the absence of engagement at the highest level since US President Joe Biden took office in January.
The officials further said the CIA chief was categorically conveyed that no US operation would be allowed from Pakistani territory. They rather suggested to have asked the Americans to hand over the drones to them for carrying out the strikes against terrorist targets.


IK government was the major obstacle.

Furthermore both Ned Price ( State department) John Kirby ( Department of defense) Jack Sulivan ( NSA). Refused to clearly deny about US asking for bases from Pakistan rather than said we are working closely with Pakistan to reach a formal security arrangement.


After Burns visit it was reported in Pakistan media on TV that Pakistan refused to give bases to US even before the axiox interview.

( This is where it all began).

Even after clear refusal by IK about 3rd party interference in Afghanistan through Pakistan soil. The negotiations kept on happening.


There are a lot of information including people like Saleem Safi admitting Pakistan was asked for bases.
 
Last edited:

VCheng

ELITE MEMBER
Sep 29, 2010
42,971
55
36,388
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
You are wrong.
There were successive reports in us Pak media about US initiated talks about bases.
There is a thing called GOOGLE which usually can do this kind of job - finding information.

ROFL. Talk about an echo chamber. The Pakistani media was parroting their PM. Why do you think PMIK was made to stop saying that? :D

Meanwhile, US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan, in response to a question about the US seeking a drone base in Pakistan, said: “We have had constructive discussions in the military, intelligence and diplomatic channels with Pakistan about the future of America’s capabilities to ensure that Afghanistan never again becomes a base from which Al Qaeda rises or any other terrorist group can attack the United States.”

So WHERE does the answer say that USA was seeking a base?

This is the answer: "We have had constructive discussions in the military, intelligence and diplomatic channels with Pakistan about the future of America’s capabilities to ensure that Afghanistan never again becomes a base from which Al Qaeda rises or any other terrorist group can attack the United States.”
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom