What's new

Rana Sanaullah complains to army chief about drugs case against him

Kharral

FULL MEMBER
Dec 16, 2014
679
-11
759
Country
United Kingdom
Location
Pakistan
@blain2

Since we are being objective, mind telling us who did this to Rana ?
 

Attachments

  • C2A4B73B-76F3-4BEF-A492-6C115EA0D729.png
    C2A4B73B-76F3-4BEF-A492-6C115EA0D729.png
    541.3 KB · Views: 5
Last edited:

khail007

SENIOR MEMBER
Mar 25, 2008
5,067
6
6,212
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Arab Emirates
View attachment 860249
  • Rana Sanaullah files a written complaint with the army chief regarding drug case against him.
  • Alleges that Shahzad Akbar had bag containing 15kg of heroin which he sought to have planted in his room.
  • Claims ANF Major General Arif Malik got involved in exchange of benefits.
ISLAMABAD: Federal Minister for Interior Rana Sanaullah has filed a written complaint with the army chief regarding the role of the Anti-Narcotics Force (ANF) in the drug case against him.
Sanaullah alleged on Geo News show "Naya Pakistan" that former prime minister Imran Khan, former advisor on accountability Shahzad Akbar, and former Director General ANF Major General Arif Malik were involved in filing a fake case of 15kg of heroin possession against him.

Related items​


He further alleged that Akbar was in possession of the bag containing 15kg of heroin and that he asked the Islamabad police to plant it in his room at Parliament Lodges. "When Islamabad Police refused, Maj Gen Malik got involved in this conspiracy and got benefits in return," he claimed.
The interior minister said that in addition to Fawad Chaudhry, Tariq Bashir Cheema and Ijaz Shah in the cabinet also called the case a hoax.
Rana Sanaullah said that he has filed a written complaint with Chief of Army Staff General QamarJaved Bajwa regarding the role of the ANF in the case, as well as complained to him in person. While his complaint has been received, he said that the army has "its own method of investigation".

They are produce of ESTABLISHMENT and their matters also seems to be managed there.
 

AgNoStiC MuSliM

ADVISORS
Jul 11, 2007
24,803
84
34,394
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
So who made the bogus case? The army or the government, or both? Army guys ran the ANF, while PTI ministers and affiliates backed and prosecuted. We also had several claims from both the PTI and the ANF that irrefutable evidence was on hand, and that there was a very clear video of the apprehending of Rana Sanaullah that would prove his guilt.

First these useless pricks spent months attacking and maligning Justice Qazi Faez Isa, and now Imran & Co. are backtracking and apologising, distancing themselves. Seems like a similar story here. It's pathetic.
From a procedural standpoint, the ANF was the agency that received the alleged ‘tip/intel’, determined it was actionable, made the arrest and alleged drug seizure.

The ANF was therefore responsible for providing all feedback and information necessary for the civilian government to make a decision to move forward with prosecuting the case.

The responsibility, therefore, rests with the ANF/Army.
 

Jungibaaz

RETIRED MOD
Jul 4, 2010
8,716
112
18,134
Country
Pakistan
Location
France
From a procedural standpoint, the ANF was the agency that received the alleged ‘tip/intel’, determined it was actionable, made the arrest and alleged drug seizure.

The ANF was therefore responsible for providing all feedback and information necessary for the civilian government to make a decision to move forward with prosecuting the case.

The responsibility, therefore, rests with the ANF/Army.
Why did some, including ex-ministers from within the government at the time, allege that the decision was also made elsewhere? Even at the cabinet level? And why after both ANF and government ministers claimed that irrefutable video evidence existed was none produced before the court, and none seems to have surfaced at all after the fact?

As I recall in the days after the arrest, Shehryar Afridi (Minister of Narcotics Control at the time, under whose theoretical control comes the ANF) stood in parliament, while citing the Quran and Sunnah (as some politician types are wont to do it seems), and then proceeded on a 10 min rant on Rana Sanaullah's guilt. He also said as much in a separate presser while again citing video evidence. And let's not forget, both the government and the army were on the "same page" in this era.
 

AgNoStiC MuSliM

ADVISORS
Jul 11, 2007
24,803
84
34,394
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Why did some, including ex-ministers from within the government at the time, allege that the decision was also made elsewhere? Even at the cabinet level? And why after both ANF and government ministers claimed that irrefutable video evidence existed was none produced before the court, and none seems to have surfaced at all after the fact?

As I recall in the days after the arrest, Shehryar Afridi (Minister of Narcotics Control at the time, under whose theoretical control comes the ANF) stood in parliament, while citing the Quran and Sunnah (as some politician types are wont to do it seems), and then proceeded on a 10 min rant on Rana Sanaullah's guilt. He also said as much in a separate presser while again citing video evidence. And let's not forget, both the government and the army were on the "same page" in this era.
Who provided the video and/or other evidence to the PTI government and ministers?

Intelligence, evidence etc are all provided by the investigating and intel organizations, in this case the ANF which is basically under the control of the Army given that an active duty Army General runs the organization. The civilian government and ministers therefore would have based their claims and decision to prosecute on the evidence provided to them by the ANF/Army.

The responsibility here therefore lies with the ANF-Army leadership for fabricating a case, planting evidence and misleading the civilian government.
 

SaadH

SENIOR MEMBER
Apr 22, 2021
2,144
-1
2,866
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Why is he writing to Neutral in Chief when the Neutrals take no part in politics and/or legal matters as DGISPR and the military brats keep telling us?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom