• Monday, November 18, 2019

Prithvi Defence Vehicle Fails to Intercept

Discussion in 'Indian Defence Forum' started by Rahul9090, May 15, 2014.

  1. Rahul9090

    Rahul9090 FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    966
    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2014
    Ratings:
    +1 / 1,491 / -3
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    Despite the hype and hoopla over the successful maiden trial of India’s longest range interceptor missile Prithvi Defence Vehicle (PDV), it reportedly failed to destroy the target missile as no interception could take place due to technical reasons.

    In another ‘failure’ of the weapon system, the interceptor missile, which took off from the launcher following the command generated after the target missile was fired, passed the latter at an altitude of 40 km instead of its capability of 150 km.

    On April 27, DRDO claimed to have successfully carried out its first PDV test-fire, meeting the mission objectives, which according to the defence officials, was a significant milestone in the direction of developing a two-layered Ballistic Missile Defence (BMD) system.

    While the target missile having a range of over 2,000-km was fired from a Naval ship off the Paradip coast, the interceptor was launched from the launching complex-IV of the Integrated Test Range (ITR) at Wheeler Island.

    Sources at the test range told this paper that the warhead in the interceptor missile did not explode. “The interceptor did not directly hit the target missile. So it cannot be claimed that a ‘hit-to-kill’ took place during the mission unlike in earlier attempts involving AAD interceptor missile,” an official said, requesting anonymity.

    This apart, the interceptor missile failed to achieve the desired altitude. During Prithvi Air Defence (PAD) mission earlier, the DRDO had already achieved 80 km altitude level and this time it was expected that the PDV interceptor would attain at least 120 km though it has the capability of attaining 150 km altitude.

    “The missed distance between the interceptor and the target was more than what was expected. But we still can say that the mission was partially successful as the interceptor could be fired in time. In an automated operation, a radar-based detection and tracking system successfully detected and tracked the enemy ballistic missile,” the official added.

    Defence officials, however, claimed that the warhead in the interceptor missile was not meant to be exploded in this mission. DRDO Chief Avinash Chander said the main objective was to track the target missile and see the performance of the infrared (IR) seeker in the interceptor. “These parameters were met as per the expectation,” he said.

    Prithvi Defence Vehicle Fails to Intercept -The New Indian Express
     
  2. Robinhood Pandey

    Robinhood Pandey SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    5,581
    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2013
    Ratings:
    +7 / 23,619 / -7
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    WTF is wrong with this New Indian express.

    they reported Akash SAM test a failure but it wasn't.

    :pissed::pissed::pissed:
     
  3. JOEY TRIBIANI

    JOEY TRIBIANI SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    3,345
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2013
    Ratings:
    +1 / 2,958 / -14
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    made in india .. haan .:sarcastic:
     
  4. Indo-guy

    Indo-guy SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    4,820
    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2013
    Ratings:
    +6 / 5,357 / -4
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    Singapore
    DRDO has made it amply clear the mission objective was not to destroy target but near intercept it to get maximal data from IR seeker .

    why you are playing this news while all reports have confirmed that mission objectives were met ?
     
  5. Gessler

    Gessler SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    3,579
    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2012
    Ratings:
    +3 / 5,258 / -13
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    Everyone already knows the test was meant to calibrate the seekers, no explosive was carried by the interceptor.

    Typical pakistani...haan. :sarcastic:
     
  6. Robinhood Pandey

    Robinhood Pandey SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    5,581
    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2013
    Ratings:
    +7 / 23,619 / -7
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
  7. Jesus

    Jesus BANNED

    New Recruit

    Messages:
    57
    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2013
    Ratings:
    +0 / 89 / -0
    Even if it's a complete failure its not a big deal... because it's design/rocket science, everyone can't make it in the first attempt....
     
  8. Indo-guy

    Indo-guy SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    4,820
    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2013
    Ratings:
    +6 / 5,357 / -4
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    Singapore
    @Rahul9090 at least include other reports regarding PDV interception test in your post to bring balance .

    The threads such as this do no justice to the topic concerned.

    and becomes only troll fest for those who are frustrated by India's phenomenal success in continued series of path breaking missiles .
     
  9. acetophenol

    acetophenol SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    6,999
    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2011
    Ratings:
    +8 / 10,240 / -2
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    From the same article. In my knowledge ,a success in when parameters are met upto expectation. I don't know how New Indian Express interprets the term.:coffee:
     
  10. JOEY TRIBIANI

    JOEY TRIBIANI SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    3,345
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2013
    Ratings:
    +1 / 2,958 / -14
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
  11. Indo-guy

    Indo-guy SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    4,820
    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2013
    Ratings:
    +6 / 5,357 / -4
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    Singapore
    I don't know which stupid is editing these news in New Indian Express ...
     
  12. acetophenol

    acetophenol SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    6,999
    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2011
    Ratings:
    +8 / 10,240 / -2
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    Ananth Krishnan (tarmak007 fame) works for Indian Express. But this article is not by him
     
  13. SrNair

    SrNair ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    15,984
    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2013
    Ratings:
    +4 / 15,672 / -27
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    Oh well , it is an experiment so it may success or failure ,after all it is just an starting experiment .Experiment happens because it is made in India.While our western neighbour dont need experiment because they tested in it virtually in some type of star war technology chamber:lol::lol::lol: .Sorry I forgot .Pakistan cant imagine a stuff like this then how they can test.After all made in Pakistan is still a distant dream for our western friends.:rofl::rofl::rofl:
     
  14. datalibdaz

    datalibdaz FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    823
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2012
    Ratings:
    +2 / 1,085 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    That is no biggie...try try again
     
  15. Robinhood Pandey

    Robinhood Pandey SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    5,581
    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2013
    Ratings:
    +7 / 23,619 / -7
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    Awwww . . looks like i stepped on your tail . . . i am sorry that wasn't intentional :sarcastic::sarcastic::sarcastic: