Why don't you go and ask a Hong Kong cockroach why US didn't come to their aid since you are so sure US will fight China for Taiwan even absorbing a nuclear strike?So... nothing about HKers wanting US to nuke China then. I guess It is just you projecting your own fantasy eh? That kinda answers all of my questions then.
Because you should come to realize how moronic your comments in this thread sound when they are exactly the same as what the Hong Kong cockroaches thought before Beijing squashed them like a bug.Why should I? You are the one that uses HK as an example so you go ask them.
Yeah moronic like when you believe China will start the nuke party, or when you believe that HKers wish nuclear holocaust upon China.Because you should come to realize how moronic your comments in this thread sound when they are exactly the same as what the Hong Kong cockroaches thought before Beijing squashed them like a bug.
I guess people sometimes are delusion....ATM, despite of whatever studies, China don't have the same kind of nuke capabilities vs-via the US, especially the warheads that could reach the US.
So until China developed peer-level nuke capabilities, especially the nuke delivery capabilities, there is always a risk that the US will go nuke after they lost a conventional war badly.
So I don't think its wise to take over Taiwan until China have sufficient ICBMs (I means 1500+ ICBM warheads).
No one can bring the fight to China.I guess both sides will resort to conventional war and China will likely be fighting war in its soil. The question is, if China is fighting alone, how long can it sustain the destruction on its urban centers? Unless China can bring the war to European or US soil, but that is highly unlikely.