What's new

Pentagon report cites 'lack of maturity' of Lockheed F-35 jet

MST

FULL MEMBER
Oct 26, 2010
1,507
-1
1,397
Country
India
Location
United States
(Reuters) - Lockheed Martin Corp's's new F-35 fighter jet has completed over a third of its planned flight tests, but it is still facing problems with the helmet needed to fly the plane, software development and weapons integration, according to a report by the Pentagon's chief weapons tester.

The 18-page report, sent to Congress on Friday, included a detailed account of those issues and others, which it said underscored the "lack of maturity" of the $396 billion weapons program, the Pentagon's most expensive ever.

The program exceeded the number of flight tests and specific system tests planned for 2012 but lagged in some areas due to unresolved problems and newly discovered issues. The program has already completed over 20,000 specific tests of items and capabilities on the plane, but has 39,579 more such tests to go.

The report highlighted the continued growing pains of the ambitious Lockheed fighter program, which began in 2001 and has been restructured three times in recent years to slow down production and allow more progress on the development program.

Lockheed is building three different models of the F-35 fighter jet for the U.S. military and eight countries that helped pay for its development: Britain, Canada, Italy, Turkey, Denmark, the Netherlands, Australia and Norway.

The Pentagon plans to buy 2,443 of the warplanes in coming decades, although many analysts believe U.S. budget constraints and deficits will eventually reduce that overall number.

"The lag in accomplishing the intended 2012 flight testing content defers testing to following years, and in the meantime, will contribute to the program delivering less capability in the production aircraft in the near term," said the report prepared by Michael Gilmore, the Pentagon's director of operational test and evaluation.

Gilmore said the program remained saddled by a high level of concurrency or overlap between development, production and testing. The Pentagon planned that overlap from the start, but its top weapons buyer, Frank Kendall, last year described that approach as "acquisition malpractice."

CONDUCTING FLIGHT TESTS

The report said the program conducted 1,092 flight tests in 2012, 18 percent more than the 927 flight tests planned, running more tests than scheduled for the Marine Corps B-model and the Navy's C-model or carrier variant.

But it fell short of the flight tests planned for the Air Force's conventional takeoff A-model. That model completed 30 percent less test points than planned due to operating limits on the plane and problems with the weapon bay doors, it said.

It said flight tests were also limited by problems with the air refueling system, which led to restrictions on all A-model planes and required new instrumentation to isolate the cause.

The plane's stealthy coatings - which make it nearly invisible to enemy radars - were also peeling off on horizontal tail surfaces due to higher-than-expected temperatures during high-speed, high-altitude flights, the report said.

The Marine Corps version of the plane flew more than planned but lagged its target for test points by 49 percent due to issues with the weapon bay doors and an engine lift fan needed for that B-model's vertical landings, the report said.

The lift fan is built by Rolls Royce, a supplier to the engine maker, Pratt & Whitney, a unit of United Technologies Corp.

The weight of the new plane remained fairly steady over the past year, and the mean time between critical failures increased, but the plane's performance remained below the level expected for this point in the program, the report said.

The report also cited continuing delays with Lockheed's delivery of software for the new fighter, noting that software packages needed to support flight test were delayed or not complete when delivered.

It said the complex helmet that integrates data for the pilot from all the plane's sensors was still facing issues, as is a computerized logistics system.

Weapons integration testing was delayed by a number of factors, including problems with the performance of a radar system and in tracking targets.

Durability testing of the Marine's B-model had to be halted in December after multiple cracks were found on the underside of the plane's fuselage, the report said.

It also cited problems with the ability of the Navy's C-model to transfer video and imagery data to ships, and said one live-fire test revealed a potentially serious problem with the coolant system, which was now being addressed.

More work was also needed on a system aimed at protecting the plane from fuel tank explosions caused by lightning, the report concluded, noting that flight operations were currently banned within 25 miles of known lightning conditions.

No immediate comment was available from Lockheed or the Pentagon's F-35 program office.

Source
 

AUz

ELITE MEMBER
Sep 14, 2010
8,449
-12
14,437
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
F-35 seems to be a failure. It is just tooooooooooooooooo costly. US economy can't afford it right now...
 

MST

FULL MEMBER
Oct 26, 2010
1,507
-1
1,397
Country
India
Location
United States
Don't get to conclusion so fast. They will not just make it, they will sell it to the whole world (allies) and make more money out of it then you can imagine. There is a reason why US became and is a super power.
 

UKBengali

ELITE MEMBER
May 29, 2011
16,741
7
20,147
Country
Bangladesh
Location
United Kingdom
Don't get to conclusion so fast. They will not just make it, they will sell it to the whole world (allies) and make more money out of it then you can imagine. There is a reason why US became and is a super power.
Not necessarily.

Both the Chinese J-31 and Russian T-50 are much more manoeuvrable planes.

Some customers are already having 2nd thoughts about this plane.
 

Safriz

BANNED
Aug 30, 2010
20,860
-1
11,284
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
Looks like chinese alternative will be up and running long before F-35 sees the sunlight....
 

MST

FULL MEMBER
Oct 26, 2010
1,507
-1
1,397
Country
India
Location
United States
Looks like chinese alternative will be up and running long before F-35 sees the sunlight....
That only time will tell. Though considering where these countries are now Americans were there 15 years ago, I won't bet on them.

Not necessarily.

Both the Chinese J-31 and Russian T-50 are much more manoeuvrable planes.

Some customers are already having 2nd thoughts about this plane.
But they are all opting for American 4.5 generation planes and not Russian or Chinese 5th gen. So their requirement of 5th gen plane will still be there if not now then 10 years down the line
 

UKBengali

ELITE MEMBER
May 29, 2011
16,741
7
20,147
Country
Bangladesh
Location
United Kingdom
That only time will tell. Though considering where these countries are now Americans were there 15 years ago, I won't bet on them.



But they are all opting for American 4.5 generation planes and not Russian or Chinese 5th gen. So their requirement of 5th gen plane will still be there if not now then 10 years down the line
Basically the F-35 only has great avionics to make up for lack of aerodynamic performance and that may not be enough.

Both the J-31 and T-50 will slaughter it in combat if their avionics are anywhere near as good as the F-35.

There is a reason that the US does not sell the F-22 to anyone:D
 

Wright

SENIOR MEMBER
Apr 29, 2012
2,305
0
1,349
Looks like chinese alternative will be up and running long before F-35 sees the sunlight....
US equipment tends to undergo a lot more testing and evaluation than Russian and possibly Chinese equipment. Both have been more quantity oriented historically.
 
Sep 5, 2010
9,054
-3
10,213
Country
India
Location
Canada
Really 396 billion $ for this F 35 programme alone? :what:

Its getting delayed much. However if they manage to iron out the problems faced, F 35 will be one of the world's best. I bet it will be mostly used as a carrier based fighter/.
 

Esc8781

FULL MEMBER
Jun 7, 2012
1,199
0
1,351
Country
United States
Location
United States
Basically the F-35 only has great avionics to make up for lack of aerodynamic performance and that may not be enough.

Both the J-31 and T-50 will slaughter it in combat if their avionics are anywhere near as good as the F-35.

There is a reason that the US does not sell the F-22 to anyone:D
Got the data to back that up?
 

Esc8781

FULL MEMBER
Jun 7, 2012
1,199
0
1,351
Country
United States
Location
United States
EVERYONE knows that the F-35 has crap aerodynamic performance.

Look it up if you like.
Although it has a lot of lift under it fuselage, by its mach area rule? Anyways its not a supersonic fighter, it wasn't made for that. Gosh people think its an Raptor.
 

MST

FULL MEMBER
Oct 26, 2010
1,507
-1
1,397
Country
India
Location
United States
Basically the F-35 only has great avionics to make up for lack of aerodynamic performance and that may not be enough.

Both the J-31 and T-50 will slaughter it in combat if their avionics are anywhere near as good as the F-35.

There is a reason that the US does not sell the F-22 to anyone:D
That is a very very big 'IF'
 

satishkumarcsc

SENIOR MEMBER
Nov 26, 2008
2,632
0
1,389
Country
India
Location
India
It might be just me...but I would still want the Harriers production to run. Right now and for the next decade I still think the modernized harrier will do a better job compared to the F 35-B
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom