DESERT FIGHTER
ELITE MEMBER
Couple of years back was at Tilla ranges, saw troops (Gen Tariqs escort) carrying similar “type series” weapons..![]()
Smart Rifle & a good replacement for our Type 56?
Couple of years back was at Tilla ranges, saw troops (Gen Tariqs escort) carrying similar “type series” weapons..![]()
Smart Rifle & a good replacement for our Type 56?
It was one of the weapons which performed well once PA was doing trials.
Sir please don't say these things, kind of heart breaking. For three long years we tested best Assault Rifles from all around world but not even one selected, and we are still stuck with 60 years old G3 and 70 year old AK 47.It was one of the weapons which performed well once PA was doing trials.
Bhai, please dont forget our 78 year old MG1A3 (MG-42 from 1942)Sir please don't say these things, kind of heart breaking. For three long we tested best Assault Rifles from the world but nothing selected and we are still stuck with 60 years old G3 and 70 year old AK 47.
@Path-Finder
Waisay i am willing to wait a bit more for SCAR H......Sir please don't say these things, kind of heart breaking. For three long we tested best Assault Rifles from the world but nothing selected and we are still stuck with 60 years old G3 and 70 year old AK 47.
@Path-Finder
I think SCRA was out-performed by CZ BERN ? why wait for it, I doubt it will be coming except some for SF units might consider it, but they are already equipped with M4A1 and Type 52's .Waisay i am willing to wait a bit more for SCAR H......
Wait matlab k jahan itna wait kia hai for a new rifle, lets wait a bit more.I think SCRA was out-performed by CZ BERN ? why wait for it, I doubt it will be coming except some for SF units might consider it, but they are already equipped with M4A1 and Type 52's .
What was the need for type56-II if type56 worked fine? Or was paucity in numbers(SMG) the reason to order type56-II?They are heavy, but their metallurgy is awesome....you keep firing all day, no hiccups, no effect on accuracy due t prolonged firing.....
But Type 56-II really sucks....starts to give away after couple of mags.
Type 56 are in small numbers. They were then complemented by Type 56-II.What was the need for type56-II if type56 worked fine? Or was paucity in numbers(SMG) the reason to order type56-II?
One is a battle rifle (G3), other is an assault rifle....different roles, different mechanisms, different uses, they actually complement each other very well.....like a relationship of ESHORAD, LOMAD and HIMAD.G3 is also being used. Why are two types of rifles in use? Wouldn't it be better to use single type or single caliber ?
Not for PA use.There was another rifle of 223 caliber made by POF which looked similar to G3 and was supposed to replace it? What happened to that project?
Well I am not a expert on guns as I never hold or Fire a Real gun in my life, but If you said soWait matlab k jahan itna wait kia hai for a new rifle, lets wait a bit more.
Excellent and uncommon quality, the one with which one learns alot.Some questions because I am naturally a curious person.
Isn't MG3 derived from MG42 and improved over old design. Many still use it around the world as GP machine gun. It still works exceptionally well in good hands.Bhai, please dont forget our 78 year old MG1A3 (MG-42 from 1942)
You are right. But then G3 has also improved from its initial design. That why all these weapons are still in use today.Isn't MG3 derived from MG42 and improved over old design. Many still use it around the world as GP machine gun. It still works exceptionally well in good hands.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it is the reason it hasn't seen much improvement as it is already well engineered.
That is understandable.One is a battle rifle (G3), other is an assault rifle....different roles, different mechanisms, different uses, they actually complement each other very well.....like a relationship of ESHORAD, LOMAD and HIMAD.
Thanks for the response, many members including myself are learning a lot from your contributions to pdf; that helps us improve our knowledge base as well.Excellent and uncommon quality, the one with which one learns alot.
Strictly speaking, both are 7.62....which shows our emphasis on a heavy bullet able to inflict massive damage...That is understandable.
However, that is not the trend in many armed forces . For example US military uses m4, m16 and minimi; only m240 is of different caliber. Furthermore, what crossed my mind was the presence of different calibers complexifying logistics and tactics. That came to my mind from reading US field manuals which thankfully are free to download.
Shukriya, i always feel honored. Knowledge is best used if it is spread.Thanks for the response, many members including myself are learning a lot from your contributions to pdf; that helps us improve our knowledge base as well.