What's new

Pakistan will not accept 'forceful takeover' in Afghanistan, says NSA Moeed Yusuf

Xestan

SENIOR MEMBER
Sep 25, 2009
2,173
3
3,092
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
National Security Adviser Dr Moeed Yusuf says Pakistan will support a political solution to the Afghan conflict. — Moeed Yousuf Twitter/File

National Security Adviser Dr Moeed Yusuf says Pakistan will support a political solution to the Afghan conflict. — Moeed Yousuf Twitter/File

National Security Adviser Dr Moeed Yusuf has said that Pakistan will not accept a "forceful takeover" in Afghanistan and instead support a political solution to the war-torn country's conflict.

"We will not accept a forceful takeover," he told reporters at a press conference held at the Pakistan embassy in Washington, DC late on Wednesday, wrapping up a week of talks with the US administration.

The NSA stressed that the only solution for peace in Afghanistan was a “political one”.

"We have made it absolutely clear that we are with the international community on where this goes," he said. "But the world also needs to be clear that the US invests in a political settlement.”

Editorial: Only a miracle can make the Taliban suspend their assault on Afghanistan and agree to talk peace with Kabul
Dr Yusuf said the harsh rhetoric of the Afghan government against Pakistan was making it impossible to maintain good relations between the neighbours.

"We are beginning to see a very conscious, deliberate effort by the Afghan government to scapegoat Pakistan," he said, adding that Afghanistan wanted to shift the entire blame of its failures onto Islamabad.

He reiterated that although Pakistan wanted to have very good relations with the Afghan government, "unfortunately, the vitriol and rhetoric coming from there is making that impossible".

He urged the Afghan government and the Taliban to “compromise and reach a peace settlement” as the insurgents make rapid gains amid the US troop withdrawal.

He stressed that the internationally recognised government in Kabul needed to stop looking for a military victory and should include a broader range of Afghans in any future talks.

“There will have to be some compromise given the ground reality. But the violence will have to stop,” he said.

Yusuf said his US counterpart Jake Sullivan and others in President Joe Biden's administration did not make specific requests of Pakistan, but discussed “how quickly we can get all these actors in one room to have a sincere conversation”.
He dismissed talk of Islamabad exerting leverage over the Taliban.

“Whatever limited leverage we had, we used,” he said, pointing to Pakistan encouraging the Taliban to enter talks with the Afghan government in Doha.

“Now with the troop withdrawal, that leverage has logically gone down further,” he added.

Yusuf further said Pakistan was no longer in a position to accept Afghan refugees as it currently hosts about 3.5 million.
"Peace in Afghanistan is non-negotiable for us," he said. "We under no circumstances are prepared to see protracted instability that in the past has caused spillover into Pakistan."

The NSA's remarks came after the US said it wanted Pakistan to keep its borders with Afghanistan open for Afghan refugees, a demand that could strain already tense relations between the two countries.

“So, in a place like Pakistan, it’ll be important that their borders remain open,” said a senior State Department official while briefing journalists on the new US refugee admission programme for Afghan nationals.

NSA Yusuf had said at a briefing in Washington this week that arrangements should be made to keep displaced Afghans inside their country instead of pushing them into Pakistan.

“Why make them dar-ba-dar (homeless)? Make arrangements for them inside their country. Pakistan does not have the capacity to take more refugees,” he said.

 

-=virus=-

BANNED
Sep 18, 2012
2,277
-10
1,083
Country
India
Location
India
Taking Kabul is going to be a long game, the AT know it well too.

These guys “controlled” large parts of Afghanistan all through the occupation too.

NATO will keep bombing them from “over the horizon”, the current regime will keep Kabul.

All it means is more instability in the region and the potential for most blowback is in Pakistan. Let’s see if Pak ever gets around to denying their airspace to US air.
 

Pappa Alpha

FULL MEMBER
Jul 5, 2020
537
0
935
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
Taking Kabul is going to be a long game, the AT know it well too.

These guys “controlled” large parts of Afghanistan all through the occupation too.

NATO will keep bombing them from “over the horizon”, the current regime will keep Kabul.

All it means is more instability in the region and the potential for most blowback is in Pakistan. Let’s see if Pak ever gets around to denying their airspace to US air.

"American forces have stepped up a bombing campaign, but the White House and the Pentagon insist these are the final days of combat support."

Beta, worry about China and your chicken neck before defecating your expert opinions here.
 

-=virus=-

BANNED
Sep 18, 2012
2,277
-10
1,083
Country
India
Location
India

"American forces have stepped up a bombing campaign, but the White House and the Pentagon insist these are the final days of combat support."

Beta, worry about China and your chicken neck before defecating your expert opinions here.
Do they even dare take Kabul by force when even the Pak establishment is saying it won’t support such an outcome ?
 

Zibago

ELITE MEMBER
Feb 21, 2012
35,657
10
56,989
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Taking Kabul is going to be a long game, the AT know it well too.

These guys “controlled” large parts of Afghanistan all through the occupation too.

NATO will keep bombing them from “over the horizon”, the current regime will keep Kabul.

All it means is more instability in the region and the potential for most blowback is in Pakistan. Let’s see if Pak ever gets around to denying their airspace to US air.
They now control the border crossings

They will bleed Ghani regime out
Do they even dare take Kabul by force when even the Pak establishment is saying it won’t support such an outcome ?
Ideally we dont want that but if it happens due to stubbornness from Ghani side well we will establish relation with them for the greater good :partay:
Even China and Iran have prepared themselves for a Taliban ruled Afghanistan
 

Super Falcon

ELITE MEMBER
Jul 3, 2008
14,199
-4
5,439
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Arab Emirates
Stoplying we are not in 1900 era we all know who is who what is what accept truth move forward
 

Xestan

SENIOR MEMBER
Sep 25, 2009
2,173
3
3,092
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
These kinds of statements from the State of Pakistan shatters Taliban apologist dreams.
 

GumNaam

ELITE MEMBER
Sep 23, 2016
11,259
-1
15,230
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Taking Kabul is going to be a long game, the AT know it well too.

These guys “controlled” large parts of Afghanistan all through the occupation too.

NATO will keep bombing them from “over the horizon”, the current regime will keep Kabul.

All it means is more instability in the region and the potential for most blowback is in Pakistan. Let’s see if Pak ever gets around to denying their airspace to US air.
the Taliban strategy is brilliant. surround all the major cities and sabotage the afghan forces internally through frequent rocket attacks and IEDs; shoot and scoot tactics. the "over the horizon" air support is meaningless when the siege laid by the taliban is both fluid and invisible and the enemy disappears by the time air support arrives; the targeted afghan soldiers are already dead by then. Literally starve them into submission.
 
Last edited:

Xestan

SENIOR MEMBER
Sep 25, 2009
2,173
3
3,092
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
The Taliban are a reality. Whether accept them or not.
How I see it, Pakistan might not accept Taliban takeover like last time, but will eventually do if international community takes the first step.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom