What's new

Pakistan officially inducts HQ 9 Air Defence system

iLION12345_1

FULL MEMBER
May 1, 2016
1,892
12
5,520
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Doubt , the already deployed JY-27A was purely for testing , It is gone now

JY-27 is no longer deployed , it was here only for testing , However the PAF operates YLC-2 & YLC-18A Radars which can be networked to provide data to the HQ9 if it isnt already being done
View attachment 787396
The testing site for JY-27A is empty since 2021 started , only changes at this site are more F-7s getting retired and lined up here in late 2021
That may be because it was simply moved from the testing site to an operational area. Even if the radar is Purchased, we will never know. So either side could be right. I guess the more likely decision comes down to PAFs requirement for such a radar.
 

doorstar

SENIOR MEMBER
Apr 19, 2018
3,147
-1
5,597
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
they eat aloo ghosht too??
not only that, culture, heritage, muhashirah sub ek tha or angraij ne baadar line banai aur ye jaalim Pakistani phoj hum ko judah rakhay hai. jai durga maan, mein tera aur brahma ka pandit tha, hoon, rahoon gaa. ye naam dharm to change kia tha hukmiran e waqt ko khoosh karne k liay

 

Path-Finder

ELITE MEMBER
Feb 7, 2013
21,358
1
31,517
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
not only that, culture, heritage, muhashirah sub ek tha or angraij ne baadar line banai aur ye jaalim Pakistani phoj hum ko judah rakhay hai. jai durga maan, mein tera aur brahma ka pandit tha, hoon, rahoon gaa. ye naam dharm to change kia tha hukmiran e waqt ko khoosh karne k liay

dont forget this amritsari ###### made jati umra in Pakistan as well! should be sent back there so it can continue legacy of dullah haran wala and darling pandy.
 

MultaniGuy

ELITE MEMBER
Feb 6, 2017
9,595
-1
9,165
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
General Qamar Javed Bajwa, Chief of Army Staff (COAS) visited Army Air Defence Centre Karachi today . On arrival COAS laid floral wreath at Shahuada monument.

According to ISPR, COAS witnessed commissioning of state of the art Chinese origin HQ-9/P HIMADS (High to Medium Air Defence System) into Pakistan Army Air Defence. Lieutenant General Hamood uz Zaman Khan; Commander Army Air Defence Command briefed COAS about strategic weapon system.

Induction of HIMADS will significantly enhance Comprehensive Layered Integrated Air Defence (CLIAD) shield of aerial frontiers of Pakistan as the system is fully integrated through a well-knit Digitised System on its inventory. Capable of intercepting multiple air targets including aircrafts, cruise missiles and Beyond Visual Range Weapons at ranges over 100 kilometres with Single Shot Kill Probability, HQ-9/P is considered as a strategic long range Surface to Air Missile (SAM) with remarkable flexibility and precision.

Speaking at the occasion, COAS said that induction of high-tech systems will make Pakistan’s air defence impenetrable in the emerging threat scenario. Highlighting the criticality of air defence in the overall defence of motherland, COAS said exemplary synergy between Pakistan Air Force and Pakistan Army Air Defence makes country’s air defence impregnable. Pakistan–China strategic partnership and defence collaboration is a factor of stability in the region, COAS remarked.

Senior officials from China were also present on the occasion, the ISPR added.



A good move, since the West are unreliable or duplicitous.

Better work with China to make our own variants.

I heard HQ-9P is comparable to S-300 missile, unless of course if have heard wrong.
 
Last edited:

Zarvan

ELITE MEMBER
Apr 28, 2011
52,554
85
60,776
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
A good move, since the West are unreliable or duplicitous.

Better work with China to make our own variants.

I heard HQ-9P is comparable to S-300 missile, unless of course if have heard wrong.
It's better then S-300. Specially if we bought the latest version of HQ 9 then it would be way better then S 300.
 

Abid123

FULL MEMBER
Jan 1, 2021
594
-1
806
Country
Pakistan
Location
Norway
I hope Pakistan does not deploy its air defence systems and radars from open sites. If they are deployed from open sites they are vulnerable to attacks by stand munitions such as cruise missiles. By attack I mean "first strike" to destroy the system. Pakistan should follow the North Korean model. North Korea deploys it air defence assets from heavily fortified underground installations. These are often build into mouintans. Which are mounted on lifts to emerge and again take cover as needed. In other words this makes North Korea's air defence assets extremely difficult to neutralise for standard air to ground munitions.
 

White and Green with M/S

SENIOR MEMBER
Oct 29, 2020
3,810
-2
2,003
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
I hope Pakistan does not deploy its air defence systems and radars from open sites. If they are deployed from open sites they are vulnerable to attacks by stand munitions such as cruise missiles. By attack I mean "first strike" to destroy the system. Pakistan should follow the North Korean model. North Korea deploys it air defence assets from heavily fortified underground installations. These are often build into mouintans. Which are mounted on lifts to emerge and again take cover as needed. In other words this makes North Korea's air defence assets extremely difficult to neutralise for standard air to ground munitions.
EASTERN PART ITSNOT POSSIBLE AND THESE RADARS CAN ALSO DETECT THESE CM WITH DISTANCE
 

alphapak

FULL MEMBER
Nov 22, 2017
1,517
0
3,513
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
A good move, since the West are unreliable or duplicitous.

Better work with China to make our own variants.

I heard HQ-9P is comparable to S-300 missile, unless of course if have heard wrong.
Back in 2013 Turkey gave a tender out for long range SAM's, the contest was between S300, HQ9, Patriot Pac3, Eurosam Aster 30.
Turkey tested all 4 systems and HQ9 performed the best. They wanted to buy the Hq 9's but I think China did not want to give
transfer of technology.
 

MH.Yang

SENIOR MEMBER
Jul 21, 2021
2,202
1
4,285
Country
China
Location
China
Back in 2013 Turkey gave a tender out for long range SAM's, the contest was between S300, HQ9, Patriot Pac3, Eurosam Aster 30.
Turkey tested all 4 systems and HQ9 performed the best. They wanted to buy the Hq 9's but I think China did not want to give
transfer of technology.
1. Turkey requests to transfer technology to aselsan and roketsan.
2. Turkey requires China to purchase and use German chassis.
3. Turkey requires to modify the system to be compatible with NATO system.
It is impossible for China to agree to these conditions.
 

alphapak

FULL MEMBER
Nov 22, 2017
1,517
0
3,513
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
1. Turkey requests to transfer technology to aselsan and roketsan.
2. Turkey requires China to purchase and use German chassis.
3. Turkey requires to modify the system to be compatible with NATO system.
It is impossible for China to agree to these conditions.
Did not know about point 2 and 3, these conditions make it iimpossible for China.
 

LeGenD

MODERATOR
Aug 28, 2006
12,403
76
14,736
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Back in 2013 Turkey gave a tender out for long range SAM's, the contest was between S300, HQ9, Patriot Pac3, Eurosam Aster 30.
Turkey tested all 4 systems and HQ9 performed the best. They wanted to buy the Hq 9's but I think China did not want to give
transfer of technology.
Again, from where this story is coming from?

True account is following:


HQ-9 is good but no need to exaggerate.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom