What's new

Pakistan must be destroyed!

Xone

FULL MEMBER
Oct 13, 2019
264
0
273
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
All these things are Nothing more than wistful whining of foul, filthy cow urine drinkers. who think they are brave enough to challenge powerful potent Pakistan. this shows how much hate and grudge burns their hearts and minds. Pakistan is here to survive and thrive and rest assured, it is here to thump and thrash its enemies as well. they do not know, Pakistanis love to die for the sake of their homeland. For them, giving life is getting the eternal life of Jannah.
"There is no Power on Earth that can undo Pakistan".
This a clearcut message of our beloved Quaid to the world from the Pakistani nation.
 
Last edited:

not_two

FULL MEMBER
Jan 7, 2020
190
0
57
Country
India
Location
India
The article points out to the worst possible scenario that can be expected from across the border .. It is time for India when national consciousness will be moulded at particular direction ..Once the decision made it will have consequences in future decades ..Minds are receptive as they are in time of emergency ..China itself is in the border after decades of playing it's role as catalyst in India pak rivalry ..It is time for Pakistan too to decide whether they want to continue what they have been doing or leave the stage for their Master and concentrate on development ..Anyhow interesting times ahead ..We can expect many outcome here .. Positive or negative
 

crankthatskunk

SENIOR MEMBER
May 20, 2011
4,054
3
7,810
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
If India is still planning to attack AJK and GB, what Pakistan is doing!!
Waiting for them to attack!!

We need to take out India.
India out of Kashmir solves lots of problems.
1- Free Kashmir.
2- Free Pakistan's water resources.
3- Pakistan then should use India's tactics and let the Indians face famine and flooding.
4- Breakup of India in to small entities , like they used to be historically. Once Kashmir and probably Punjab with it goes, it would be domino effect. Eastern states, then Southern states would form separate countries. India is destined to be broken up, make no mistake about it.
 

not_two

FULL MEMBER
Jan 7, 2020
190
0
57
Country
India
Location
India
If India is still planning to attack AJK and GB, what Pakistan is doing!!
Waiting for them to attack!!

We need to take out India.
India out of Kashmir solves lots of problems.
1- Free Kashmir.
2- Free Pakistan's water resources.
3- Pakistan then should use India's tactics and let the Indians face famine and flooding.
4- Breakup of India in to small entities , like they used to be historically. Once Kashmir and probably Punjab with it goes, it would be domino effect. Eastern states, then Southern states would form separate countries. India is destined to be broken up, make no mistake about it.
If your thinking is majority then above article is up to the point and precise .
 

not_two

FULL MEMBER
Jan 7, 2020
190
0
57
Country
India
Location
India
All thing is Nothing more than wistful whining of foul, filthy cow urine drinkers. who think they are brave enough to challenge powerful potent Pakistan. this shows how much hate and grudge burns their hearts and minds. Pakistan is here to survive and thrive and rest assured, it is here to thump and thrash its enemies as well. they do not know, Pakistanis love to die for the sake of their homeland. For them, giving life is getting the eternal life of Jannah.
"There is no Power on Earth that can undo Pakistan".
This a clearcut message of our beloved Quaid to the world from the Pakistani nation.
Every beginning has an end and every end has a new beginning, don't worry, broken soul, life will one day come to an end.
 

Bouncer

FULL MEMBER
May 31, 2014
1,019
1
1,075
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Comparing India to Ancient Rome is an absolute joke ... they cannot even have sanitation on the same level as the Romans did 2000+ years ago.
:rofl:

I think this comment should have ended this thread.


The article points out to the worst possible scenario that can be expected from across the border .. It is time for India when national consciousness will be moulded at particular direction ..Once the decision made it will have consequences in future decades ..Minds are receptive as they are in time of emergency ..China itself is in the border after decades of playing it's role as catalyst in India pak rivalry ..It is time for Pakistan too to decide whether they want to continue what they have been doing or leave the stage for their Master and concentrate on development ..Anyhow interesting times ahead ..We can expect many outcome here .. Positive or negative
I don't know which article you read, but the one shared here doesn't talk about "worst possible scenario", it actually talks about the prevalent mindset in India. Let me summarize it for you;

Pakistan bad. They are an existential threat to India. Must be destroyed. Love Jihad.
But brave yindoos soldiers can't do anything because babus in India don't let them.

Basically this is India's narrative since ages. Could have, would have, should have. A recent example is your chief or someother Pajeet bitching about not having Rafles after getting your asses kicked in a fight YOU started lol
 

not_two

FULL MEMBER
Jan 7, 2020
190
0
57
Country
India
Location
India
:rofl:

I think this comment should have ended this thread.




I don't know which article you read, but the one shared here doesn't talk about "worst possible scenario", it actually talks about the prevalent mindset in India. Let me summarize it for you;

Pakistan bad. They are an existential threat to India. Must be destroyed. Love Jihad.
But brave yindoos soldiers can't do anything because babus in India don't let them.

Basically this is India's narrative since ages. Could have, would have, should have. A recent example is your chief or someother Pajeet bitching about not having Rafles after getting your asses kicked in a fight YOU started lol
You are seeing what's there in article and I am seeing what kind of article it is and what it points to compared to hundreds of other pointer articles ..In that regard this one is exercised in the background of worst possible scenario ..
All else is play of prejudiced mind of yours and mine..
 

Pan-Islamic-Pakistan

ELITE MEMBER
May 28, 2018
13,218
5
28,323
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Source: Times of India



Delenda Carthago Est, Cato the Elder used to urge the Roman Senate. “Carthage must be destroyed.” In 146BC, the Roman general Scipio Aemilianus razed Carthage to the ground and sold its entire population into slavery. Carthaginians were never again to trouble Rome again. The hour has come for India to echo Cato the Elder’s clarity. Pakistan must be destroyed.

India’s post-partition relations with Pakistan should have been as benign as they are with Iran, Afghanistan, and later Bangladesh, but they are not. Pakistan has waged war on India and driven devastating murderous religious wars in India continuously ever since it was born in 1947. Those who would have us believe that Pakistan has legitimate grievances against India say that Indian bullying and imperialism is the reason for the Indo-Pak conflict, and that a resolution of the Kashmir issue would bring peace. This is completely false.

Were Kashmir resolved to Pakistan’s satisfaction, the Islamic Republic would not lay down its arms. Its military would not leave the stage, the vast cadre of Jihad it has built would not disband. Instead, it would be taken as the triumph of the Mujahideen against the Hindu, and a validation of Pakistan’s ambitions, perseverance, and methods. Flushed with success, Pakistan would press the advantage with more separatist movements in India, more insurgencies, more narratives of the persecution of Muslims, to hammer wedges into the fault lines and fractures of the Indian Union till they widen beyond the capacity of the Indian state to heal them, leading ultimately to the break-up of the Republic of India.

Have no doubts about it. Pakistan is waging Jihad against India, it has been doing so since the moment of its creation, and it will never stop.

There are only two choices before us: One, pretend that it is not so, pretend that Pakistan has not created devastating socio-political crises for India, pretend that Pakistan is an ineffectual annoyance that can be endured for another 100 years and more.

Or two, face the reality that an enormously powerful organized machinery of Jihad sits astride the Sindhu River, in the heart of Ancient India, on this side of the Khyber Pass, constantly striving to shatter the Republic that the Hindus have built for themselves, unable to digest that the dominion of Islam over the Hindus has passed and determined to subdue the idolaters once more.

The reality is that we do not have the luxury to sit bunkered down and inactive, hoping to endure the next 70 years of Pakistan’s assault as we have endured it over the last 70. Pakistan is working overtime to revive the Khalistan movement and has made enormous strides in organizing Sikh communities in Canada and elsewhere, that are rooted in the villages of Punjab, towards a resurgence of Khalistani activism. Inactivity at this juncture will only leave Punjab aflame again in a few years, Hindu and Sikh conflict exploding. The youth of Kashmir can already be seen to have become radicalized and hateful of India beyond anything this author has seen hitherto, while the state administration has sat idle and inactive for over 15 years, letting Pakistani Islamist ideological cancer spread unchecked.

This cannot be allowed to continue. The security and continued existence of the Indian Republic depend on pushing the world of Mujahideen and Ghazis to the other side of the Khyber Pass and out of the Indian subcontinent, and exterminating the ideology and organizations of Jihad from the subcontinent. That requires the complete destruction of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

Let’s have no illusions about this. There are no talks and treaties that can cleanse Pakistan of the obsession to wage Jihad upon the Hindus. If the Republic of India does not bring about the destruction of Pakistan, godfather of Jihad, then it cannot secure itself from the forces of Islamism that have been active in the subcontinent ever since Iqbal switched from “Sare Jahan se Accha Hindustan hamara” to “Muslim hain hum, Sara Jahan Hamara“.

The only question is whether India has the gumption, the cunning, and the will to do what is necessary. Our record is poor. In 1965, our forces reached Lahore and were called back. We could have solved the problem right then. There would have then been no Khalistan movement, no genocide in Bangladesh, no Kashmir problem, no KP refugees, no nuclear threat, and the hundreds of thousands of Indian citizens, soldiers and civilians, who have died because of Pakistan’s villainy would have been spared the horror.

In 1971, again Pakistan was saved because Indira Gandhi, her political position as an Iron Lady secured, preferred to throw away the victory won by our soldiers, rather than stand up to the Americans and finish the job once and for all.

The opinion of those in the know is that India’s military preparedness for a war with Pakistan is poor. Lt. General KJ Singh wrote in Times of India, “Pragmatically considering our current state of equipment and ammunition inventory, we seem to lack the decisive edge and requisite force asymmetry for a full scale conventional war”.

This ought not come as a surprise to anyone who understands the nature and mentality of politics and bureaucracy in India. Let’s be very clear on this: India has managed to hold off Pakistan for 70 years only because of our vast size advantage. Were Pakistan the same size as India in resources, population and economy, India would have ceased to exist decades ago. If we have held our ground, it is not because of any commitment, drive and competence on the part of our elected officials, bureaucrats, and diplomats.

Prime Minister Modi faces an overwhelming challenge in turning the ship of the Indian State to deal with the existential challenge of Pakistan. He is beset by an establishment that urges caution, talks, cool-headedness, limited action, constantly reminds him of the nuclear threat, the Chinese threat, while tying up India’s preparedness for war in committees, red tape and corruption.

Mr. Modi must understand that how India relates to Pakistan is a prisoner of an Indian establishment that would rather do nothing and has spent decades ensuring that nothing can be done. And he must figure out how this is to be changed so that India acquires and exercises military power advantage over Pakistan that is commensurate to India’s vastly greater resources.

More than anything, we need gumption. We need to switch from constantly fearing the consequences of any action we take, to boldly taking action that terrifies the enemy and drives him into anxiety and fear. “Surgical strikes” will not do. Pakistan’s strategy, from Mumbai to Pulwama, of filling our TV screens with the images of the blood and bodies of our people splattered across our streets, is a form of psychological terrorism straight out of the ISIS playbook. Killing a few Pakistani soldiers in the dark of night is not a meaningful response. Indian response to Pakistani military sponsored Jihadist terrorism should be scenes of corresponding carnage on Pakistani soil, scaled up from any act committed in India.

The attack on Pulwama should have been followed by a massive BrahMos missile barrage upon Hafiz Saeed’s compound in Muridke, near Lahore. If that would be an act of war, then let it be so. Or are we so afraid of war, and so deficient in cunning, that Pakistan can carry on brazenly without fear of Nuclear War but we can do nothing in return because we’re terrified of Nuclear War? Why is Pakistan not the slightest bit frightened of our nukes but we are paralyzed into inaction by theirs? It really all comes down to political and bureaucratic leadership that has never pushed itself to create and maintain India’s mastery in war and foreign relations. Let us remember that the US brought about the destruction of the USSR despite the threat of nuclear Armageddon. We have no choice but to achieve the same for Pakistan!

India’s international standing is weak. No one takes initiatives like the Quad seriously because no one has any expectation that India can be relied up to back up its allies with aggression and boldness when called upon. But if there was ever an American president who would back a bold and decisive play by India and provide political cover and resources, its Donald Trump. If there was ever a time that Britain can be pushed to support India internationally against state sponsors of terrorism, its now, as Britain looks to India for political, security and trade relationships in the post-Brexit scenario.

Let us also face the ghosts of 1962. China has never acted militarily against India in support of Pakistan. It provides economic, equipment and diplomatic advantages to Pakistan, but the Indian fear of a “two front war” needs to be tested. China has never come to Pakistan’s aid militarily, not in 1965, not in 1971, not in 1999. Realistically, it is virtually impossible that China would declare war on India, sink Indian ships, attack Indian bases were India to get tough with Pakistan. The Sino-Pakistan relationship is not so strong as to trip China into war when its own strategic calculus does not call for it. India must call Pakistan’s China bluff, or the fear of China will forever keep us afraid of dealing with Pakistan.

Let us be clear: If every such attack by Pakistan slips from the news after some minor and irrelevant response has been made, it will only be a matter of decades before Pakistan’s plans come to fruition, and the Indian Republic, paralyzed by inactivity, indifference and cowardice, does crack apart at the seams.

If that is not an outcome we want, Pakistan has to be destroyed and we have to gear up to make it happen. Starting now.





The article is old but still relevant , depicts the Indian mind sets. For those who think India wants peace.
Great share.

The author lies in many places, and forgets that India has been obsessive in its efforts to destroy Pakistan in any way possible, going so far as to box us out of cricket.

75,000 dead Pakistanis due to Indian terror, capture of Kulbushan Yadav at the Iran border, and the failed Balakot fiasco are proof.

Ofcourse when the tables turn, Pakistan was going to start fighting back against a continuous belligerent threat from obsessive India.

IVC is Pakistan. This is our land, we are natives. Indian aliens have no place on this land, just as they do not in Kashmir.

However, I quite like the fear and terror in the minds of the writer and the vast majority of Hindu Indians who think the same.

If they want war, stop talking and come. We are ready. You will experience nightmares which you only dreamed of.

A conflict between Pakistan and India literally means the end of civilisation. It will bring a Nuclear winter over the world that could last 3-5 years with crops falling to 10% where majority of mankind will die out of starvation. It would be the single greatest famine the world has ever seen.

rushing into this means 100% WW3 begins because the rest of the world would have to pick up arms and go to war with each other due to Nuclear winter and famine starvation while the supply chain will be disrupted completely no export and import anywhere. The whole world will go into flame.

Imo what China and the US is doing is preparing for this event silently until the time approaches and they know WW3 is unavoidable but once that door is opened it will not close until 70-80% of the current world population die and the world you know would change since post-WW3 would be vastly different with new countries and borders born alltogether with around 1-billion population max to 2-B starting life allover again.

There is a higher possibility Pakistan survives since they are more resilient then their Indian counter-parts cuz is gonna be a dog-fight. Some people will resort to eating a dog just to survive. The Indians are disjoined and not united people in tough critical times this will be there fall and undoing where a prophecy will come to be fullfilled
I believe it will stay a limited war and nukes will not be used. Therefore we should confidently press our advantage against Indians, just as they wish to.

I believe strongly that India will attack, and it will be disastrous. Kashmir will switch to our hands, and then India will fragment internally.

Maybe then Indian splinter states can be disarmed of nukes by the world community.

However the scenario of nuclear war IS coming, and most likely will happen when the US homeland is attacked. If you read Niamatullah Shah Wali, he has predicted it.

I swear you could present that article as written in 1960, 1980, 2000 or 2020 and I would be believable because it so accurately reflects their fantasy mindset towards Pakistan, it is a nation built on hate.

All we hear is crying and whinging, and nothing else, bunch of big babies.
Indeed brother, fantasy is the perfect word for this hubris.

If India could it would have done it by now. The reason 71 could not be replicated is because India is in no position despite the so called superiority. Simple!
The primary reason of this is because Pakistanis are not Bengalis and nothing unites us more than a threat from India. Another reason is nuclear weapons and not having a no first use policy. In between of them our armed forces are no pushover in terms of conventional capabilities. We can hold India long enough.
We can also pull battle hardened lashkars from Afghanistan and former FATA for this purpose, in addition to our regular army. Now also we do have some religious parties recruiting Mujahideen to help in an eventual war with India.

In such a war, it is the guerrilla which provide the unforseen advantage. Indians are incapable of thinking outside the box, therefore they will be caught totally off guard.
 
Last edited:

IceCold

PDF VETERAN
May 1, 2007
16,297
8
19,069
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Indians are incapable of thinking outside the box, therefore they will be caught totally off guard.
Indians apart from their rhetoric are not that stupid. Under Modi i cant say but in general they are shrewd and would never get into something unless they know they can win 100% which is why they are trying to destabilize us through 5th generation warfare and through their assets in political parties such as Nawaz and Co to do their bidding. They think they can create a situation similar to East Pakistan and can than intervene with world support.
We need to tread carefully and need to first get rid of the snakes in Pakistan. They are trying to discredit the armed forces so that the support that forces enjoy would no longer be there hence the narrative spewed by Nawaz.
 

Unite & Defend

FULL MEMBER
Jan 26, 2017
621
3
803
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
They are a-ugly people, both in and outside.

The land that is located in now Northern India belongs to Muslims of the sub-continent anyway! , so a RE-SUBJUGATION is required.

The Indian tribes have proved they cant govern their affairs with any sort of social etiquette and wider morality.

The project for a Hindu led sub-continent has failed - time for the Muslims to bring in progression.
 

FAROOQ RASHID BUTT

FULL MEMBER
Aug 7, 2020
158
0
369
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Arab Emirates
Source: Times of India



Delenda Carthago Est, Cato the Elder used to urge the Roman Senate. “Carthage must be destroyed.” In 146BC, the Roman general Scipio Aemilianus razed Carthage to the ground and sold its entire population into slavery. Carthaginians were never again to trouble Rome again. The hour has come for India to echo Cato the Elder’s clarity. Pakistan must be destroyed.

India’s post-partition relations with Pakistan should have been as benign as they are with Iran, Afghanistan, and later Bangladesh, but they are not. Pakistan has waged war on India and driven devastating murderous religious wars in India continuously ever since it was born in 1947. Those who would have us believe that Pakistan has legitimate grievances against India say that Indian bullying and imperialism is the reason for the Indo-Pak conflict, and that a resolution of the Kashmir issue would bring peace. This is completely false.

Were Kashmir resolved to Pakistan’s satisfaction, the Islamic Republic would not lay down its arms. Its military would not leave the stage, the vast cadre of Jihad it has built would not disband. Instead, it would be taken as the triumph of the Mujahideen against the Hindu, and a validation of Pakistan’s ambitions, perseverance, and methods. Flushed with success, Pakistan would press the advantage with more separatist movements in India, more insurgencies, more narratives of the persecution of Muslims, to hammer wedges into the fault lines and fractures of the Indian Union till they widen beyond the capacity of the Indian state to heal them, leading ultimately to the break-up of the Republic of India.

Have no doubts about it. Pakistan is waging Jihad against India, it has been doing so since the moment of its creation, and it will never stop.

There are only two choices before us: One, pretend that it is not so, pretend that Pakistan has not created devastating socio-political crises for India, pretend that Pakistan is an ineffectual annoyance that can be endured for another 100 years and more.

Or two, face the reality that an enormously powerful organized machinery of Jihad sits astride the Sindhu River, in the heart of Ancient India, on this side of the Khyber Pass, constantly striving to shatter the Republic that the Hindus have built for themselves, unable to digest that the dominion of Islam over the Hindus has passed and determined to subdue the idolaters once more.

The reality is that we do not have the luxury to sit bunkered down and inactive, hoping to endure the next 70 years of Pakistan’s assault as we have endured it over the last 70. Pakistan is working overtime to revive the Khalistan movement and has made enormous strides in organizing Sikh communities in Canada and elsewhere, that are rooted in the villages of Punjab, towards a resurgence of Khalistani activism. Inactivity at this juncture will only leave Punjab aflame again in a few years, Hindu and Sikh conflict exploding. The youth of Kashmir can already be seen to have become radicalized and hateful of India beyond anything this author has seen hitherto, while the state administration has sat idle and inactive for over 15 years, letting Pakistani Islamist ideological cancer spread unchecked.

This cannot be allowed to continue. The security and continued existence of the Indian Republic depend on pushing the world of Mujahideen and Ghazis to the other side of the Khyber Pass and out of the Indian subcontinent, and exterminating the ideology and organizations of Jihad from the subcontinent. That requires the complete destruction of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

Let’s have no illusions about this. There are no talks and treaties that can cleanse Pakistan of the obsession to wage Jihad upon the Hindus. If the Republic of India does not bring about the destruction of Pakistan, godfather of Jihad, then it cannot secure itself from the forces of Islamism that have been active in the subcontinent ever since Iqbal switched from “Sare Jahan se Accha Hindustan hamara” to “Muslim hain hum, Sara Jahan Hamara“.

The only question is whether India has the gumption, the cunning, and the will to do what is necessary. Our record is poor. In 1965, our forces reached Lahore and were called back. We could have solved the problem right then. There would have then been no Khalistan movement, no genocide in Bangladesh, no Kashmir problem, no KP refugees, no nuclear threat, and the hundreds of thousands of Indian citizens, soldiers and civilians, who have died because of Pakistan’s villainy would have been spared the horror.

In 1971, again Pakistan was saved because Indira Gandhi, her political position as an Iron Lady secured, preferred to throw away the victory won by our soldiers, rather than stand up to the Americans and finish the job once and for all.

The opinion of those in the know is that India’s military preparedness for a war with Pakistan is poor. Lt. General KJ Singh wrote in Times of India, “Pragmatically considering our current state of equipment and ammunition inventory, we seem to lack the decisive edge and requisite force asymmetry for a full scale conventional war”.

This ought not come as a surprise to anyone who understands the nature and mentality of politics and bureaucracy in India. Let’s be very clear on this: India has managed to hold off Pakistan for 70 years only because of our vast size advantage. Were Pakistan the same size as India in resources, population and economy, India would have ceased to exist decades ago. If we have held our ground, it is not because of any commitment, drive and competence on the part of our elected officials, bureaucrats, and diplomats.

Prime Minister Modi faces an overwhelming challenge in turning the ship of the Indian State to deal with the existential challenge of Pakistan. He is beset by an establishment that urges caution, talks, cool-headedness, limited action, constantly reminds him of the nuclear threat, the Chinese threat, while tying up India’s preparedness for war in committees, red tape and corruption.

Mr. Modi must understand that how India relates to Pakistan is a prisoner of an Indian establishment that would rather do nothing and has spent decades ensuring that nothing can be done. And he must figure out how this is to be changed so that India acquires and exercises military power advantage over Pakistan that is commensurate to India’s vastly greater resources.

More than anything, we need gumption. We need to switch from constantly fearing the consequences of any action we take, to boldly taking action that terrifies the enemy and drives him into anxiety and fear. “Surgical strikes” will not do. Pakistan’s strategy, from Mumbai to Pulwama, of filling our TV screens with the images of the blood and bodies of our people splattered across our streets, is a form of psychological terrorism straight out of the ISIS playbook. Killing a few Pakistani soldiers in the dark of night is not a meaningful response. Indian response to Pakistani military sponsored Jihadist terrorism should be scenes of corresponding carnage on Pakistani soil, scaled up from any act committed in India.

The attack on Pulwama should have been followed by a massive BrahMos missile barrage upon Hafiz Saeed’s compound in Muridke, near Lahore. If that would be an act of war, then let it be so. Or are we so afraid of war, and so deficient in cunning, that Pakistan can carry on brazenly without fear of Nuclear War but we can do nothing in return because we’re terrified of Nuclear War? Why is Pakistan not the slightest bit frightened of our nukes but we are paralyzed into inaction by theirs? It really all comes down to political and bureaucratic leadership that has never pushed itself to create and maintain India’s mastery in war and foreign relations. Let us remember that the US brought about the destruction of the USSR despite the threat of nuclear Armageddon. We have no choice but to achieve the same for Pakistan!

India’s international standing is weak. No one takes initiatives like the Quad seriously because no one has any expectation that India can be relied up to back up its allies with aggression and boldness when called upon. But if there was ever an American president who would back a bold and decisive play by India and provide political cover and resources, its Donald Trump. If there was ever a time that Britain can be pushed to support India internationally against state sponsors of terrorism, its now, as Britain looks to India for political, security and trade relationships in the post-Brexit scenario.

Let us also face the ghosts of 1962. China has never acted militarily against India in support of Pakistan. It provides economic, equipment and diplomatic advantages to Pakistan, but the Indian fear of a “two front war” needs to be tested. China has never come to Pakistan’s aid militarily, not in 1965, not in 1971, not in 1999. Realistically, it is virtually impossible that China would declare war on India, sink Indian ships, attack Indian bases were India to get tough with Pakistan. The Sino-Pakistan relationship is not so strong as to trip China into war when its own strategic calculus does not call for it. India must call Pakistan’s China bluff, or the fear of China will forever keep us afraid of dealing with Pakistan.

Let us be clear: If every such attack by Pakistan slips from the news after some minor and irrelevant response has been made, it will only be a matter of decades before Pakistan’s plans come to fruition, and the Indian Republic, paralyzed by inactivity, indifference and cowardice, does crack apart at the seams.

If that is not an outcome we want, Pakistan has to be destroyed and we have to gear up to make it happen. Starting now.

The article is old but still relevant , depicts the Indian mind sets. For those who think India wants peace.
Indian writers and journalists are experts in dream fiction writing. They consider the whole globe as a Bollywood studio. But war is not an art of camera tricks like Indian film making . .
 

JackFell

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Sep 22, 2020
95
0
87
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
Trolling
Source: Times of India



Delenda Carthago Est, Cato the Elder used to urge the Roman Senate. “Carthage must be destroyed.” In 146BC, the Roman general Scipio Aemilianus razed Carthage to the ground and sold its entire population into slavery. Carthaginians were never again to trouble Rome again. The hour has come for India to echo Cato the Elder’s clarity. Pakistan must be destroyed.

India’s post-partition relations with Pakistan should have been as benign as they are with Iran, Afghanistan, and later Bangladesh, but they are not. Pakistan has waged war on India and driven devastating murderous religious wars in India continuously ever since it was born in 1947. Those who would have us believe that Pakistan has legitimate grievances against India say that Indian bullying and imperialism is the reason for the Indo-Pak conflict, and that a resolution of the Kashmir issue would bring peace. This is completely false.

Were Kashmir resolved to Pakistan’s satisfaction, the Islamic Republic would not lay down its arms. Its military would not leave the stage, the vast cadre of Jihad it has built would not disband. Instead, it would be taken as the triumph of the Mujahideen against the Hindu, and a validation of Pakistan’s ambitions, perseverance, and methods. Flushed with success, Pakistan would press the advantage with more separatist movements in India, more insurgencies, more narratives of the persecution of Muslims, to hammer wedges into the fault lines and fractures of the Indian Union till they widen beyond the capacity of the Indian state to heal them, leading ultimately to the break-up of the Republic of India.

Have no doubts about it. Pakistan is waging Jihad against India, it has been doing so since the moment of its creation, and it will never stop.

There are only two choices before us: One, pretend that it is not so, pretend that Pakistan has not created devastating socio-political crises for India, pretend that Pakistan is an ineffectual annoyance that can be endured for another 100 years and more.

Or two, face the reality that an enormously powerful organized machinery of Jihad sits astride the Sindhu River, in the heart of Ancient India, on this side of the Khyber Pass, constantly striving to shatter the Republic that the Hindus have built for themselves, unable to digest that the dominion of Islam over the Hindus has passed and determined to subdue the idolaters once more.

The reality is that we do not have the luxury to sit bunkered down and inactive, hoping to endure the next 70 years of Pakistan’s assault as we have endured it over the last 70. Pakistan is working overtime to revive the Khalistan movement and has made enormous strides in organizing Sikh communities in Canada and elsewhere, that are rooted in the villages of Punjab, towards a resurgence of Khalistani activism. Inactivity at this juncture will only leave Punjab aflame again in a few years, Hindu and Sikh conflict exploding. The youth of Kashmir can already be seen to have become radicalized and hateful of India beyond anything this author has seen hitherto, while the state administration has sat idle and inactive for over 15 years, letting Pakistani Islamist ideological cancer spread unchecked.

This cannot be allowed to continue. The security and continued existence of the Indian Republic depend on pushing the world of Mujahideen and Ghazis to the other side of the Khyber Pass and out of the Indian subcontinent, and exterminating the ideology and organizations of Jihad from the subcontinent. That requires the complete destruction of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

Let’s have no illusions about this. There are no talks and treaties that can cleanse Pakistan of the obsession to wage Jihad upon the Hindus. If the Republic of India does not bring about the destruction of Pakistan, godfather of Jihad, then it cannot secure itself from the forces of Islamism that have been active in the subcontinent ever since Iqbal switched from “Sare Jahan se Accha Hindustan hamara” to “Muslim hain hum, Sara Jahan Hamara“.

The only question is whether India has the gumption, the cunning, and the will to do what is necessary. Our record is poor. In 1965, our forces reached Lahore and were called back. We could have solved the problem right then. There would have then been no Khalistan movement, no genocide in Bangladesh, no Kashmir problem, no KP refugees, no nuclear threat, and the hundreds of thousands of Indian citizens, soldiers and civilians, who have died because of Pakistan’s villainy would have been spared the horror.

In 1971, again Pakistan was saved because Indira Gandhi, her political position as an Iron Lady secured, preferred to throw away the victory won by our soldiers, rather than stand up to the Americans and finish the job once and for all.

The opinion of those in the know is that India’s military preparedness for a war with Pakistan is poor. Lt. General KJ Singh wrote in Times of India, “Pragmatically considering our current state of equipment and ammunition inventory, we seem to lack the decisive edge and requisite force asymmetry for a full scale conventional war”.

This ought not come as a surprise to anyone who understands the nature and mentality of politics and bureaucracy in India. Let’s be very clear on this: India has managed to hold off Pakistan for 70 years only because of our vast size advantage. Were Pakistan the same size as India in resources, population and economy, India would have ceased to exist decades ago. If we have held our ground, it is not because of any commitment, drive and competence on the part of our elected officials, bureaucrats, and diplomats.

Prime Minister Modi faces an overwhelming challenge in turning the ship of the Indian State to deal with the existential challenge of Pakistan. He is beset by an establishment that urges caution, talks, cool-headedness, limited action, constantly reminds him of the nuclear threat, the Chinese threat, while tying up India’s preparedness for war in committees, red tape and corruption.

Mr. Modi must understand that how India relates to Pakistan is a prisoner of an Indian establishment that would rather do nothing and has spent decades ensuring that nothing can be done. And he must figure out how this is to be changed so that India acquires and exercises military power advantage over Pakistan that is commensurate to India’s vastly greater resources.

More than anything, we need gumption. We need to switch from constantly fearing the consequences of any action we take, to boldly taking action that terrifies the enemy and drives him into anxiety and fear. “Surgical strikes” will not do. Pakistan’s strategy, from Mumbai to Pulwama, of filling our TV screens with the images of the blood and bodies of our people splattered across our streets, is a form of psychological terrorism straight out of the ISIS playbook. Killing a few Pakistani soldiers in the dark of night is not a meaningful response. Indian response to Pakistani military sponsored Jihadist terrorism should be scenes of corresponding carnage on Pakistani soil, scaled up from any act committed in India.

The attack on Pulwama should have been followed by a massive BrahMos missile barrage upon Hafiz Saeed’s compound in Muridke, near Lahore. If that would be an act of war, then let it be so. Or are we so afraid of war, and so deficient in cunning, that Pakistan can carry on brazenly without fear of Nuclear War but we can do nothing in return because we’re terrified of Nuclear War? Why is Pakistan not the slightest bit frightened of our nukes but we are paralyzed into inaction by theirs? It really all comes down to political and bureaucratic leadership that has never pushed itself to create and maintain India’s mastery in war and foreign relations. Let us remember that the US brought about the destruction of the USSR despite the threat of nuclear Armageddon. We have no choice but to achieve the same for Pakistan!

India’s international standing is weak. No one takes initiatives like the Quad seriously because no one has any expectation that India can be relied up to back up its allies with aggression and boldness when called upon. But if there was ever an American president who would back a bold and decisive play by India and provide political cover and resources, its Donald Trump. If there was ever a time that Britain can be pushed to support India internationally against state sponsors of terrorism, its now, as Britain looks to India for political, security and trade relationships in the post-Brexit scenario.

Let us also face the ghosts of 1962. China has never acted militarily against India in support of Pakistan. It provides economic, equipment and diplomatic advantages to Pakistan, but the Indian fear of a “two front war” needs to be tested. China has never come to Pakistan’s aid militarily, not in 1965, not in 1971, not in 1999. Realistically, it is virtually impossible that China would declare war on India, sink Indian ships, attack Indian bases were India to get tough with Pakistan. The Sino-Pakistan relationship is not so strong as to trip China into war when its own strategic calculus does not call for it. India must call Pakistan’s China bluff, or the fear of China will forever keep us afraid of dealing with Pakistan.

Let us be clear: If every such attack by Pakistan slips from the news after some minor and irrelevant response has been made, it will only be a matter of decades before Pakistan’s plans come to fruition, and the Indian Republic, paralyzed by inactivity, indifference and cowardice, does crack apart at the seams.

If that is not an outcome we want, Pakistan has to be destroyed and we have to gear up to make it happen. Starting now.





The article is old but still relevant , depicts the Indian mind sets. For those who think India wants peace.

I personally hope India and Pakistan engage in a full scale nuclear exchange soon. Could you imagine how much average world IQ would go up?

It would also help with the over population problem of South Asia, despite billions in IMF and World Bank loans and grants, both nations have failed to stop their population breeding like rabbits.

The biggest problem in the Third World right now is that of dsygenic fertility. As intelligence is likely to be be highly heritable, parents of a certain intelligence quotient give birth to children of similar intelligence. In the past before the Industrial Revolution, the weak would be sifted out of the population through natural selection, this explains why the populations who have evolved in cold climates like Europeans and North-East Asians are so smart and have so much accomplishment under their belts, while populations living in hotter environments where food and water is plentiful have less civilisational achievements.

Think about it, which environment would be tougher to survive and eventually transmit your genes in,nhot Africa or icy cold Northern Europe?

Since the Industrial Revolution however, this process has halted and even reversed. Due to Western aid and medical science, we know have much more weaklings surviving in Third World nations, this explains why Sikh soldiers of the past were so tall but now the Sikhs and other Indians/Pakistanis are short, to the extent that they are manlets and are on average the same height as Northern European females (this is why currycells are doomed to be virgins in the West and often turn to more sinister methods of scoring poontang.

gjWu0_-As2HKpy6zmuuZix3pwxodG0ie2k7HmymDWlw.jpg


An India-Pakistan nuclear exchange would be greatly beneficial to the world, as long as the nuclear exchange spares areas of great natural beauty like Kashmir and is mainly between major population centres only positive things would happen.

There is going to be great conflict on the subcontinent as well as in other high fertility areas like the MENA region and Sub-Saharan Africa, hence I am of the opinion that a nuclear war solve the problem in a more humane fashion.

Another big bonus of this would be that the Third World diaspora (who is on the whole more civilised and has a higher average IQ than the populace of its homeland due to elite immigration and better living conditions) could then make its way back to the Old Country and build it up using their higher IQs, this would also end racism in the West.
 

Romeoo250

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Aug 22, 2020
50
0
54
Country
Pakistan
Location
Kuwait
PM IMRAN KHAN was right about ENDIAN modies fascist NAZI mentality this article is the true reflection of their HINDUTVA akhand bharat wet dreams to the sanghies kabhi aoo naa khusbu lagakaa.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom