I mean if history is anything to go by F-10?
Though I think it might just be referred to as J-10C in the PAF too.
Just like SU series.
Last edited:
I mean if history is anything to go by F-10?
Though I think it might just be referred to as J-10C in the PAF too.
It will remain as J-10C.....Just like SU series.
It just didn’t make any sense for PAF to wait for the Chinese to offer a superior configuration of J-10 and opt for an inferior engine.In the same way, don't trust to some members here regardless their former credibility who claimed they know it better and promised them to be AL-31FN powered!![]()
I only posted.... "AL-31FN"....
Now I am adding.... AL-31FN will not be used in PAF JS-10😂😂😂😂😂
It just didn’t make any sense for PAF to wait for the Chinese to offer a superior configuration of J-10 and opt for an inferior engine.
Even without background knowledge. It made zero sense.
Just something else ... so far this is still called J-10CP based on the J-10CE, but IMO the "J"-designation is unlikely since it is a PLAAF designation. So what will they be called or will they be simply J-10CP?
That’s also possible given F-16 > JF-17 > FC-20 within the PAF makes a proper lineage.If it goes by the old designation it would be FC-20C.
It wasn't you I had in mind ... it was a certain senior member who also claimed, the JF-17 Block 3 would have major changes on the rear-fuselage and a differen ts wing with higher or at least different aspect ratio.
On blk 3 ?And CFTs already been developed and used.
Officially? No, but there have been rumors and talks about it.Was a JF17 blk4 confirmed by the PAF?