What's new

Obama says 'took no joy' in drone strikes but 'couldn't afford to look soft on terrorism'

INDIAPOSITIVE

BANNED
Sep 20, 2014
7,377
-7
7,581
Country
India
Location
India
Former United States president Barack Obama has said that he took "no joy" in ordering drone strikes that claimed thousands of lives during his tenure, but stated that he could not afford to "look soft on terrorism".

Obama made the revelation in his new memoir "A Promised Land", that was published on November 17. In his new book, the former US president reflected on the task of ordering such killings.

Read: US drone strikes in Pakistan see 631pc increase under Obama

In excerpts carried by Business Insider, Obama claimed that his first chief of staff — Rahm Emanuel — was "obsessed" with keeping track of a list of terrorist targets. Emanuel had "spent enough time in Washington to know that his new, liberal president couldn't afford to look soft on terrorism," he wrote.

"In places like Yemen and Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq, the lives of millions of young men [...] had been warped and stunted by desperation, ignorance, dreams of religious glory, the violence of their surroundings, or the schemes of older men.

"They were dangerous, these young men, often deliberately and casually cruel. Still, in the aggregate, at least, I wanted somehow to save them — send them to school, give them a trade, drain them of the hate that had been filling their heads.

"And yet the world they were a part of, and the machinery I commanded, more often had me killing them instead."

"I took no joy in any of this. It didn't make me feel powerful. I'd entered politics to help kids get a better education, to help families get healthcare, to help poor countries grow more food — it was that kind of power that I measured myself against.

"But the work was necessary, and it was my responsibility to make sure our operations were as effective as possible," the former US president wrote in his book, the Business Insider report said.

Obama went on to write that the country's national security agencies had been challenged to construct "new forms of warfare" as Al Qaeda had scattered and gone underground.

"As Al Qaeda had scattered and gone underground, metastasising into a complex web of affiliates, operatives, sleeper cells, and sympathizers connected by the internet and burner phones, our national security agencies had been challenged to construct new forms of more targeted, nontraditional warfare — including operating an arsenal of lethal drones to take out Al Qaeda operatives within the territory of Pakistan."

Commenting on the US raid to kill Bin Laden, Obama wrote that he knew ordering a military strike inside an allied state violated its sovereignty but he decided to go for it as he did not want to miss the chance to take out the Al Qaeda leader.

“Whatever we chose to do in Abbottabad, then, would involve violating the territory of a putative ally in the most egregious way possible, short of war — raising both the diplomatic stakes and the operational complexities."

The former US president revealed that his two closest aides, the then vice president Joe Biden and defence secretary Robert Gates, had opposed the raid. “US drone strikes against Al Qaeda targets in the [Federally Administered Tribal Areas] had been generating increasing opposition from the Pakistani public," an excerpt from the book carried by Vice stated.

However, Obama had ruled out involving Pakistan because he believed that certain elements inside the country maintained links to the Taliban and perhaps even Al Qaeda.

Drone strikes in Pakistan
The US began carrying out drone strikes in 2001, after 9/11, under the administration of then president George W. Bush. After assuming office, Obama had chosen to expand the programme, carrying out hundreds of strikes in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia.

According to the the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, 424 drone attacks were carried out in Pakistan from 2004-2016.

The first drone strike in Pakistan was carried out in 2004 to kill Taliban commander Naik Muhammad, according to data available with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism report (BIJ).

There was a 631pc jump in drone strikes under Obama, compared to the Bush administration. According to the BIJ, Bush authorised 51 strikes, while Obama gave the go-ahead for 373 strikes.

Criticism
The US had come under heavy criticism for drone strikes against extremists which critics said actually hit civilians, killing women and children at wedding parties, schools and even a hospital in Afghanistan that was run by the charity organisation Doctors Without Borders.

The unmanned spy drones programme also faced criticism from congressional lawmakers who questioned its scope and legality.

Obama faced pressure from both supporters and opponents to allow greater scrutiny of the secretive decision-making process guiding drone use.

In 2016, Obama acknowledged that “civilians were killed that shouldn't have been” in past US drone strikes, but said the administration was now “very cautious” about striking where women or children were





 

Pandora

SENIOR MEMBER
Feb 15, 2013
6,465
7
9,671
Country
Pakistan
Location
Australia
Nothing turns your stomach more than a person like Obama who killed hundreds and thousands of civilians yet can still write a book about it. Making money from people he killed even after their deaths. For him these drone strikes probably looked like a game sitting far end of planet looking and clapping infront of monitor. As a matter of fact he did take joy in it bcz he can still talk and laugh about it like it was a joke.
 

vi-va

SENIOR MEMBER
Jan 23, 2019
3,949
-1
9,453
Country
China
Location
United States
Hypocrisy to the most. Obama is such a bull$hit.

Oh, I forgot one more thing. Obama got Nobel Peace Prize for killing less(really?).
Nobel Peace Prize is the most bull$hit prize ever.
 

achhu

BANNED
Jun 26, 2020
594
-19
146
Country
India
Location
India
Former United States president Barack Obama has said that he took "no joy" in ordering drone strikes that claimed thousands of lives during his tenure, but stated that he could not afford to "look soft on terrorism".

Obama made the revelation in his new memoir "A Promised Land", that was published on November 17. In his new book, the former US president reflected on the task of ordering such killings.

Read: US drone strikes in Pakistan see 631pc increase under Obama

In excerpts carried by Business Insider, Obama claimed that his first chief of staff — Rahm Emanuel — was "obsessed" with keeping track of a list of terrorist targets. Emanuel had "spent enough time in Washington to know that his new, liberal president couldn't afford to look soft on terrorism," he wrote.

"In places like Yemen and Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq, the lives of millions of young men [...] had been warped and stunted by desperation, ignorance, dreams of religious glory, the violence of their surroundings, or the schemes of older men.

"They were dangerous, these young men, often deliberately and casually cruel. Still, in the aggregate, at least, I wanted somehow to save them — send them to school, give them a trade, drain them of the hate that had been filling their heads.

"And yet the world they were a part of, and the machinery I commanded, more often had me killing them instead."

"I took no joy in any of this. It didn't make me feel powerful. I'd entered politics to help kids get a better education, to help families get healthcare, to help poor countries grow more food — it was that kind of power that I measured myself against.

"But the work was necessary, and it was my responsibility to make sure our operations were as effective as possible," the former US president wrote in his book, the Business Insider report said.

Obama went on to write that the country's national security agencies had been challenged to construct "new forms of warfare" as Al Qaeda had scattered and gone underground.

"As Al Qaeda had scattered and gone underground, metastasising into a complex web of affiliates, operatives, sleeper cells, and sympathizers connected by the internet and burner phones, our national security agencies had been challenged to construct new forms of more targeted, nontraditional warfare — including operating an arsenal of lethal drones to take out Al Qaeda operatives within the territory of Pakistan."

Commenting on the US raid to kill Bin Laden, Obama wrote that he knew ordering a military strike inside an allied state violated its sovereignty but he decided to go for it as he did not want to miss the chance to take out the Al Qaeda leader.

“Whatever we chose to do in Abbottabad, then, would involve violating the territory of a putative ally in the most egregious way possible, short of war — raising both the diplomatic stakes and the operational complexities."

The former US president revealed that his two closest aides, the then vice president Joe Biden and defence secretary Robert Gates, had opposed the raid. “US drone strikes against Al Qaeda targets in the [Federally Administered Tribal Areas] had been generating increasing opposition from the Pakistani public," an excerpt from the book carried by Vice stated.

However, Obama had ruled out involving Pakistan because he believed that certain elements inside the country maintained links to the Taliban and perhaps even Al Qaeda.

Drone strikes in Pakistan
The US began carrying out drone strikes in 2001, after 9/11, under the administration of then president George W. Bush. After assuming office, Obama had chosen to expand the programme, carrying out hundreds of strikes in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia.

According to the the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, 424 drone attacks were carried out in Pakistan from 2004-2016.

The first drone strike in Pakistan was carried out in 2004 to kill Taliban commander Naik Muhammad, according to data available with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism report (BIJ).

There was a 631pc jump in drone strikes under Obama, compared to the Bush administration. According to the BIJ, Bush authorised 51 strikes, while Obama gave the go-ahead for 373 strikes.

Criticism
The US had come under heavy criticism for drone strikes against extremists which critics said actually hit civilians, killing women and children at wedding parties, schools and even a hospital in Afghanistan that was run by the charity organisation Doctors Without Borders.

The unmanned spy drones programme also faced criticism from congressional lawmakers who questioned its scope and legality.

Obama faced pressure from both supporters and opponents to allow greater scrutiny of the secretive decision-making process guiding drone use.

In 2016, Obama acknowledged that “civilians were killed that shouldn't have been” in past US drone strikes, but said the administration was now “very cautious” about striking where women or children were





he is right .
Obama enjoyed every drone strike on innocent people of Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, Libya, Iraq, Syria and Somalia. He is a war criminal just like his white father, Bush.
he was doing strike on terrorists.
 

achhu

BANNED
Jun 26, 2020
594
-19
146
Country
India
Location
India
Hypocrisy to the most. Obama is such a bull$hit.

Oh, I forgot one more thing. Obama got Nobel Peace Prize for killing less(really?).
Nobel Peace Prize is the most bull$hit prize ever.
mao should have got after killing 45 million chinese .
Nothing turns your stomach more than a person like Obama who killed hundreds and thousands of civilians yet can still write a book about it. Making money from people he killed even after their deaths. For him these drone strikes probably looked like a game sitting far end of planet looking and clapping infront of monitor. As a matter of fact he did take joy in it bcz he can still talk and laugh about it like it was a joke.
he killed terrorists .
 

Indus Pakistan

ELITE MEMBER
May 7, 2012
17,839
179
51,118
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
So was their grandfather Durrani when he struck the Marathi motherload in Delhi.
lol.

This half breed mongrel was bigger bas*tard than any other reecent US Presidents, Trump is a angel comopared to this evil man. He was responsible for the so called surge which just protracted killing and was behind the daily drone attacks on Pakistan causing huge loss of innocent life.
 

Pandora

SENIOR MEMBER
Feb 15, 2013
6,465
7
9,671
Country
Pakistan
Location
Australia
he is right .


he was doing strike on terrorists.
For every dead terrorist he killed 10 civilians with it. Hillary herself admitted that thousands of civilians died as collateral damage while only 100 or so were the targets. If they wanted to kill terrorists they had over half a million soldiers who could have done it without killing innocent men women and children. You call this blatant disregard of human life and a war crime where you know that civilians are being killed yet still brag about it like a stupid MFker.
 

achhu

BANNED
Jun 26, 2020
594
-19
146
Country
India
Location
India
For every dead terrorist he killed 10 civilians with it. Hillary herself admitted that thousands of civilians died as collateral damage while only 100 or so were the targets. If they wanted to kill terrorists they had over half a million soldiers who could have done it without killing innocent men women and children. You call this blatant disregard of human life and a war crime where you know that civilians are being killed yet still brag about it like a stupid MFker.
so what ?
you killed millions of bangalis and hindus in bangladesh.
So was their grandfather Durrani when he struck the Marathi motherload in Delhi.
durrani hit punjabi motherlands 11 times .
khata pita lahe da baki ahmad shahe da .
 

Pandora

SENIOR MEMBER
Feb 15, 2013
6,465
7
9,671
Country
Pakistan
Location
Australia
so what ?
you killed millions of bangalis and hindus in bangladesh.
Read your own history first Kid then Bark at us. You massacred thousands upon thousands right after your country was formed to annex certain territories. It wasn't just bengalis who were killed but also Pakistanis who were loyal to states. Thousands upon thousand were murdered in terrorist attack of Mukti Bahini which was an Indian sponsored terror organisation. It was only after these attacks on non bengalis that state launched a crackdown. History always has two sides and people usually tell the side most convenient for them. In kashmir even today People live in open air prison. So please shut the **** up.
 

Strike!

FULL MEMBER
Jul 10, 2017
413
0
386
Country
Pakistan
Location
Saudi Arabia
Will we ever see accountability of General Kiyani/Zardari who played dumb to the Pakistani public while backing the drone strikes in front of Americans?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom