• Friday, November 22, 2019

Nuclear Deterrent

Discussion in 'Pakistan Strategic Forces' started by sigatoka, Jul 28, 2006.

  1. Jay_

    Jay_ FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    323
    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Ratings:
    +0 / 4 / -0
    You assumed its a check mate, but in reality it was not. So my point that assumption is the mother of all Fu*k ups, still holds.

    Pakistan assumed that India will not escalate the war and will come to negotiating table, India just proved it wrong and constrained Pakistan from all sides.
     
  2. Jay_

    Jay_ FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    323
    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Ratings:
    +0 / 4 / -0
    The leadership didnt realize it out of the blue, they realized it after loosing the whole of NLI, big difference.
    We didnt need to escalate it along the international border, we know that we can drive Pakistan out of Kargil and they did that.
     
  3. sigatoka

    sigatoka SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,013
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2005
    Ratings:
    +0 / 29 / -0

    1. I dont know what your going on about it here, using nuclear weapons results in ones own destruction which is why its not used immediately in hostilities. (when the other party also has it)


    2. It was your stupid eg which i was trying to adjust to better explain the nuclear situation. (it still remained stupid)


    3. Firstly Game theory is not my thoery, its been around for over 70 years.


    4. When did i say that.

    5. I said that India can't destroy Pak. without itself being destroyed. If you are unable to understand eg that doesnt mean im the one going on tangents.

    6. I cant admit im wrong when im not becoz of being provided so called "proof" which isnt.


    7. I prefer not to use the term "cowed" but it is indisputable that Pak. nukes has changed the behaivour of India than that which would have otherwise have prevailed.
     
  4. sigatoka

    sigatoka SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,013
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2005
    Ratings:
    +0 / 29 / -0
    You idiot you were saying that an assumption made about an entity acting in its best interest is an incorrect one.

    Taking back the hills in Kargil was not an escalation.
     
  5. Jay_

    Jay_ FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    323
    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Ratings:
    +0 / 4 / -0
    you are not even worthy enuff to have this discussion :bunny: Go make a paper boat and put ICBM's on it:mad:
     
  6. Jay_

    Jay_ FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    323
    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Ratings:
    +0 / 4 / -0
    Who ever it is, thanks for editing the content of my post :wall:
     
  7. JSK

    JSK FULL MEMBER

    New Recruit

    Messages:
    84
    Joined:
    May 11, 2006
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    everyone seems to be complaining about their posts getting edited/deleted. shouldnt there be like an 'edited' message on the bottom if it was infact edited by someone?
     
  8. Neo

    Neo RETIRED

    New Recruit

    Messages:
    18
    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2005
    Ratings:
    +0 / 3,929 / -0
    'Edited message' only apprears when the mods use the 'soft delete' or 'edit' option. Mods can chose to put their name or not, its optional.

    When a post is phisically deleted, it simply disappears from the thread.

    But your point is taken, we'll take it under consideration.

    Neo