What's new

Featured Not a question of if, but when China will strike - Indian Narrative

Baibars_1260

FULL MEMBER
Sep 12, 2020
184
0
101
Country
India
Location
United Kingdom
PLA/china did not show/declare Indian army on TV.
So.. how does that make it a point to deny Indian fighting soldiers glory in their moment of victory. Pakistan TV did not show the Kargil war either yet India showed all the details, including dead bodies. In both India Pakistan wars ( 65 and 71) mangled bloody bodies of Pakistani soldiers were shown, even with the basic 35 mm / 16 mm movie cameras of that era which only trained army cameraman could use.,Today it is so much easier to capture video with smartphones. Why this difference with China? Where are the videos?
 

GamoAccu

FULL MEMBER
Jun 2, 2020
442
0
1,092
Country
United States
Location
United States
Lets talk about Galwan clash
VK Singh told
"The Deccan Chronicle has a circulation of over 1.45 million copies each day across Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Kerala. There are eight editions in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana -- Hyderabad, Vijayawada, Rajahmundry, Vishakapatnam, Anantapur, Karimnagar, Nellore and Coimbatore. The paper also has a robust presence in Chennai, Bengaluru and Kochi. "


If it so true then it so be very easy to find from well KNOWN CREDIBLE foreign news media like AP News, Reuters, BBC, CNN, Washington Posts, New York Times, Japanese NHK news, France 24, and DW news. Please show me a NON-INDIAN source that believe in your BOLLYWOOD story.
 

SuperStar20

FULL MEMBER
Jun 6, 2020
859
-1
323
Country
India
Location
United States
Wish this statement was made by the current army chief or MOD ( just as the MOD announced shooting down a Pakistani F-16 after WC Abhinandan was captured). However the general retired in 2012 and is currently the State Transport Minister. Don't know if a single statement to one newspaper counts.
But my question is not who or how many were captured but why no media event. If Chinese soldiers were captured then why were they not photographed and filmed similar to the surrender ceremony in East Pakistan?
Shouldn't victories by the armed forces be lauded and publicized?
Indians were dancing in the streets on the Pakistani surrender in 1971. Don't they deserve some good news such as a video showing Chinese soldiers laying down their arms?
Isn't the question relevant?
PLA/China also did not say anything about Captured Indian. May be there was some agreement or negotiation to exchange.
 

mig25

FULL MEMBER
Mar 14, 2019
272
-1
300
Country
India
Location
India
indians are weird creatures .
bharata mata even after getting raped will sleep in peace because it wasnt a gang rape .
Mata in Hindi means "Mother". We never use MATA and RAPE in the same sentence ever, even if we are describing an enemy. But then, our culture is very different than yours.

Whatever the hate, just don't it.
 

GamoAccu

FULL MEMBER
Jun 2, 2020
442
0
1,092
Country
United States
Location
United States
PLA/china did not show/declare Indian army on TV.

Where are your NON-INDIAN articles to support your Bollywood story?
 

SuperStar20

FULL MEMBER
Jun 6, 2020
859
-1
323
Country
India
Location
United States

Where are your NON-INDIAN articles to support your Bollywood story?
Cute man, show me PLA/china official news.
 

Baibars_1260

FULL MEMBER
Sep 12, 2020
184
0
101
Country
India
Location
United Kingdom
PLA/China also did not say anything about Captured Indian. May be there was some agreement or negotiation to exchange.
In fact the capture of Indians came from Indian sources leaked first to the Daily Telegraph in London. Even the fatalities were FIRST announced by India, claiming initially that 3 had been killed and then saying two days later that a further 17 had lost their lives. It was then that China perhaps not wanting India to play the victim card said they had suffered casualties as well. Yes, they said nothing about taking Indians prisoners. All the capture stories came from India and the International media.
Which makes the question even MORE relevant. India was acknowledging its soldiers being captured ( Gen. V.K. Singh said we "also captured and returned "). So let's forget about the fate of the captured and killed Chinese soldiers and go back to the question.
Why didn't the Indian media honor its OWN soldiers when they returned?
WC Abhinandan was honored and India could care two hoots for the killed F-16 pilot who by the way was also not shown on TV by Pakistani media.
So why the lack of media coverage?
India has always honored its captured and injured soldiers and airmen, Recently: 1. Sepoy Babu Lal Chauhan, captured by Pakistan during the post-Uri surgical strikes 2. Flt. Lt. Nachiketa downed during the Kargil conflict 1999. 3. WC Abhinandan captured during the dog fight on 27 February, 2019.
All were given media coverage and publicly honored .
Why not those captured in Galwan?
 

Baibars_1260

FULL MEMBER
Sep 12, 2020
184
0
101
Country
India
Location
United Kingdom
This pic is fake one. Did PLA released this pic? Any news paper published quoting source as PLA?
Looks genuine. The smartphones make photographers out of every one. Some PLA soldiers probably violated norms taking these pictures. Such pictures could not have been taken back in 1965 or 1971 when cameras had to return film rolls to labs for chemical processing. Uploading pictures now is so easy it is hard to control the distribution. Which AGAIN raises the question that if India killed and captured PLA soldiers why no pictures? In the past Indian media has cheerfully published pictures of dead Pakistani soldiers. So why the difference?
 

SuperStar20

FULL MEMBER
Jun 6, 2020
859
-1
323
Country
India
Location
United States
In fact the capture of Indians came from Indian sources leaked first to the Daily Telegraph in London. Even the fatalities were FIRST announced by India, claiming initially that 3 had been killed and then saying two days later that a further 17 had lost their lives. It was then that China perhaps not wanting India to play the victim card said they had suffered casualties as well. Yes, they said nothing about taking Indians prisoners. All the capture stories came from India and the International media.
Which makes the question even MORE relevant. India was acknowledging its soldiers being captured ( Gen. V.K. Singh said we "also captured and returned "). So let's forget about the fate of the captured and killed Chinese soldiers and go back to the question.
Why didn't the Indian media honor its OWN soldiers when they returned?
WC Abhinandan was honored and India could care two hoots for the killed F-16 pilot who by the way was also not shown on TV by Pakistani media.
So why the lack of media coverage?
India has always honored its captured and injured soldiers and airmen, Recently: 1. Sepoy Babu Lal Chauhan, captured by Pakistan during the post-Uri surgical strikes 2. Flt. Lt. Nachiketa downed during the Kargil conflict 1999. 3. WC Abhinandan captured during the dog fight on 27 February, 2019.
All were given media coverage and publicly honored .
Why not those captured in Galwan?
This does not make any sense. Looks like you are talking as broken record.
News came after exchange of soldiers. I think both the army kept it secret to avoid the public pressure.
 

Baibars_1260

FULL MEMBER
Sep 12, 2020
184
0
101
Country
India
Location
United Kingdom
Cute man, show me PLA/china official news.
In fact WSJ is a far more reliable source. I think more reliable than the venerable General who said " also returned captured Chinese soldier ( single )".
And if PLA official news WAS quoted you would dismiss it as propaganda.
The IT cell training is imperfect. A different strategy must be adopted.
Don't you agree?
 
Last edited:

Baibars_1260

FULL MEMBER
Sep 12, 2020
184
0
101
Country
India
Location
United Kingdom
This does not make any sense. Looks like you are talking as broken record.
News came after exchange of soldiers. I think both the army kept it secret to avoid the public pressure.
Here's a "broken record " for you.
The Telegraph does not talk about an EXCHANGE but a release of Indian soldiers. The report is dated 19 June. There was a further batch released later.,
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Top