So.. how does that make it a point to deny Indian fighting soldiers glory in their moment of victory. Pakistan TV did not show the Kargil war either yet India showed all the details, including dead bodies. In both India Pakistan wars ( 65 and 71) mangled bloody bodies of Pakistani soldiers were shown, even with the basic 35 mm / 16 mm movie cameras of that era which only trained army cameraman could use.,Today it is so much easier to capture video with smartphones. Why this difference with China? Where are the videos?PLA/china did not show/declare Indian army on TV.
"The Deccan Chronicle has a circulation of over 1.45 million copies each day across Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Kerala. There are eight editions in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana -- Hyderabad, Vijayawada, Rajahmundry, Vishakapatnam, Anantapur, Karimnagar, Nellore and Coimbatore. The paper also has a robust presence in Chennai, Bengaluru and Kochi. "Lets talk about Galwan clash
VK Singh told
PLA/China also did not say anything about Captured Indian. May be there was some agreement or negotiation to exchange.Wish this statement was made by the current army chief or MOD ( just as the MOD announced shooting down a Pakistani F-16 after WC Abhinandan was captured). However the general retired in 2012 and is currently the State Transport Minister. Don't know if a single statement to one newspaper counts.
But my question is not who or how many were captured but why no media event. If Chinese soldiers were captured then why were they not photographed and filmed similar to the surrender ceremony in East Pakistan?
Shouldn't victories by the armed forces be lauded and publicized?
Indians were dancing in the streets on the Pakistani surrender in 1971. Don't they deserve some good news such as a video showing Chinese soldiers laying down their arms?
Isn't the question relevant?
Mata in Hindi means "Mother". We never use MATA and RAPE in the same sentence ever, even if we are describing an enemy. But then, our culture is very different than yours.indians are weird creatures .
bharata mata even after getting raped will sleep in peace because it wasnt a gang rape .
PLA/china did not show/declare Indian army on TV.
Cute man, show me PLA/china official news.China has returned 10 Indian soldiers captured during a deadly clash between the two countries in a disputed border area of the Himalayas this week, according to senior Indian security officials.www.wsj.comIt came as the two Asian nuclear powers sought to de-escalate tensions on their disputed border in the western Himalayas.www.cnbc.comIndian intelligence agencies identified unusual Chinese troop movement as far back as Februarywww.telegraph.co.uk
Where are your NON-INDIAN articles to support your Bollywood story?
In fact the capture of Indians came from Indian sources leaked first to the Daily Telegraph in London. Even the fatalities were FIRST announced by India, claiming initially that 3 had been killed and then saying two days later that a further 17 had lost their lives. It was then that China perhaps not wanting India to play the victim card said they had suffered casualties as well. Yes, they said nothing about taking Indians prisoners. All the capture stories came from India and the International media.PLA/China also did not say anything about Captured Indian. May be there was some agreement or negotiation to exchange.
Looks genuine. The smartphones make photographers out of every one. Some PLA soldiers probably violated norms taking these pictures. Such pictures could not have been taken back in 1965 or 1971 when cameras had to return film rolls to labs for chemical processing. Uploading pictures now is so easy it is hard to control the distribution. Which AGAIN raises the question that if India killed and captured PLA soldiers why no pictures? In the past Indian media has cheerfully published pictures of dead Pakistani soldiers. So why the difference?This pic is fake one. Did PLA released this pic? Any news paper published quoting source as PLA?
This does not make any sense. Looks like you are talking as broken record.In fact the capture of Indians came from Indian sources leaked first to the Daily Telegraph in London. Even the fatalities were FIRST announced by India, claiming initially that 3 had been killed and then saying two days later that a further 17 had lost their lives. It was then that China perhaps not wanting India to play the victim card said they had suffered casualties as well. Yes, they said nothing about taking Indians prisoners. All the capture stories came from India and the International media.
Which makes the question even MORE relevant. India was acknowledging its soldiers being captured ( Gen. V.K. Singh said we "also captured and returned "). So let's forget about the fate of the captured and killed Chinese soldiers and go back to the question.
Why didn't the Indian media honor its OWN soldiers when they returned?
WC Abhinandan was honored and India could care two hoots for the killed F-16 pilot who by the way was also not shown on TV by Pakistani media.
So why the lack of media coverage?
India has always honored its captured and injured soldiers and airmen, Recently: 1. Sepoy Babu Lal Chauhan, captured by Pakistan during the post-Uri surgical strikes 2. Flt. Lt. Nachiketa downed during the Kargil conflict 1999. 3. WC Abhinandan captured during the dog fight on 27 February, 2019.
All were given media coverage and publicly honored .
Why not those captured in Galwan?
In fact WSJ is a far more reliable source. I think more reliable than the venerable General who said " also returned captured Chinese soldier ( single )".Cute man, show me PLA/china official news.
Here's a "broken record " for you.This does not make any sense. Looks like you are talking as broken record.
News came after exchange of soldiers. I think both the army kept it secret to avoid the public pressure.