What's new

North Korea claims it can hit US, 'shake the world' with missile after month of increased testing

K_Bin_W

FULL MEMBER
Jul 1, 2021
1,343
0
1,330
Country
Canada
Location
Pakistan
Power is the only language the US understands.
Absolutely without a shadow of a doubt, If Eyraq had nukes US would be doing same chakka dance around saddy just like it does around the long line of Kims... Mark my words Amreeka will never ever make a pigs squeak in front of Kim it will make noises and scream like a raped whore and thats about it. Its a 70 year old story just sit back and watch.

"Too many Asians trying to blow the world up"? lol ... no too many whites trying to blow things up and take over the world. Asians have gone to war 1 time every 10 times whites go to war.

Who is trying to blow up the world.

The question is why is America not attacking North Korea when it had no issues attacking over 20 countries by justifying war using every excuse and reason even when it was false like alleging Iraq had WMD which Iraq didn't and USA later admitted they knew the Iraqis did not have WMD and still that was part of the reason used to invade Iraq.

Iraq didn't have nukes or WMDs, US said they did, attacked Iraq.

North Korea has nukes, threatens the US with nukes, US cries about it and does nothing.

The conclusion some members are implying is that US is a big pussy when it comes to fighting even someone with 1/10 its strength. But US is a bully who goes to beat up an opponent it knows is actually weak. US only goes to war over sure things it knows it can easily win and will not escalate. Where the US cannot be touched e.g. Iraq.
You hit the nail right on the head.
 

serenity

FULL MEMBER
Jan 9, 2007
1,789
0
4,281
Country
China
Location
Australia
Absolutely without a shadow of a doubt, If Eyraq had nukes US would be doing same chakka dance around saddy just like it does around the long line of Kims... Mark my words Amreeka will never ever make a pigs squeak in front of Kim it will make noises and scream like a raped whore and thats about it. Its a 70 year old story just sit back and watch.


You hit the nail right on the head.

US engages in political war when the military option is too risky like North Korea.

North Korea behaves poorly and without seemingly much sensibility or civility with open threats. However this is their choice to make and they indeed take consequences from not only USA but sometimes even China on how it behaves.

China has to support North Korea just because otherwise it will have USA military right by the border to Korea where USA can reach China conventionally but China cannot reach US conventionally.

After more than 50 years of USA having threatened Korea with nuclear attack, North Korea has threatened back. North Korea is late to that retaliation but better late than never for the North Koreans.

He most likely could care less about North Koreans one way or the other.

He's just using them as His scripted talking point.

No his point is to show the double standard and how the US behaves. When you are weak, they will take everything from you and exaggerate the reasons to justify actions. When you are strong, the very same reasons the US used to invade others apply, but the US does not act.

Iraq didn't have WMD and didn't threaten USA with anything. North Korea has WMD and threatens the USA with WMDs. USA invaded Iraq partly because USA says Iraq has WMD. Yet USA is threatened by NK and doesn't invade NK. That is the incongruency which of course has many many reasons for but I guess his point is to show how the US never behaves linearly and consistently. It always twist and turns just to make some excuses and justifications.

So basically we should see the USA invade NK since NK like Iraq was alleged, has WMD and not only does NK actually have WMD but it threatens the US!
 

Goritoes

SENIOR MEMBER
Jan 20, 2021
4,634
-1
7,118
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
He most likely could care less about North Koreans one way or the other.

He's just using them as His scripted talking point.
I figured it anyway, if you love certain people then why you want them to fight a War they can not win ? Yes NK got nukes oh ahhh very scary, but what they often Forget the nuclear Arsenal of the United States of America. NK at best can launch 50 Nukes at US from which lets say 10 or 20 able to reach US mainland, US will still remain super power, they will rebuild within a decade or two, but NK will be wiped off from map, their entire population will either die, or live in condition in which they wish they'd died.
 

Hamartia Antidote

ELITE MEMBER
Nov 17, 2013
29,285
28
19,650
Country
United States
Location
United States
there was no resolution for Iraq invasion or Libya, there was strange way on interpreting the resolutions


and wasn't it USA who supported them in UN over that

Can you try reading the UN site before replying



The Security Council today effectively authorized the use of force in Libya to protect civilians from attack, specifically in the eastern city of Benghazi, which Colonel Muammar Al-Qadhafi has reportedly said he will storm tonight to end a revolt against his regime.
 

retaxis

FULL MEMBER
Nov 16, 2007
1,564
0
1,808
Country
Australia
Location
Australia
The next country America attacks whether its Iran or NK is going to be the final nail in the coffin of the American empire. America is already in heavy debt and demographic political turmoil. White supremacists on one side hating the BLM/LGBT/Anti FA crowd. Everyone in America has turned into an extremists one way or another. Another war will cost the US everything so i hope they attack Iran or NK better yet do a full land invasion. Popcorn and lounge chair is ready for me to watch the show unfold.
 

BHAN85

FULL MEMBER
Jan 5, 2015
1,827
-1
1,141
Country
Spain
Location
Spain
Why should we attack North Korea? They haven't done anything. Are the Chinese in favor of blindly attacking countries?

Because they are a bad example of how they can get things by brute force, by nuclear blackmail.

Imagine every developing country in the world following the NK example, making nukes asking things in exchange for peace, nuclear blackmailing, it's a threat to whole world order.

It's like a Communism domino effect, but changing Communism by Nuclear Blackmail.



If NK gets a sucessful economy and luxuries things for their ruling elite by Nuclear Blackmail, others developing economy will develop nuclear weapons too.

Changing the size, mutatis mutandis, it's like if a police officer allow a thief to steal something because the thief got a big weapon, another criminals would want the same weapon.
 

Hack-Hook

ELITE MEMBER
Jan 11, 2012
15,946
3
15,090
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Location
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Can you try reading the UN site before replying



The Security Council today effectively authorized the use of force in Libya to protect civilians from attack, specifically in the eastern city of Benghazi, which Colonel Muammar Al-Qadhafi has reportedly said he will storm tonight to end a revolt against his regime.
as I Said strange interpretation of resolution as you guys mainly bombed Libyan forces which were engaging rebels forces hundreds of km deep in to the desert or in their bases , I'll never forget the interview with one of the rebels who said to European reporters that "in last two or three days we were engaging governmental forces and they pushed us back several km so I think we need some more bombing by NATO"

so I suggest you go and read the resolution too and then you go and read news from those times and think deep and say to yourself was what you did were the same as what resolution allowed?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom