• Friday, December 13, 2019

No powerful native kingdom from Pakistan in last three thousand years

Discussion in 'Military History & Tactics' started by Shark2, Apr 6, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Shark2

    Shark2 BANNED

    Messages:
    213
    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2014
    Ratings:
    +0 / 220 / -0
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    Switzerland
    If one studies history of Pakistan of last three thousand years, one is directly faced with this interesting fact that landmass of Pakistan failed to produce any native kingdom with local base and that Pakistan always remained a playground of either foreign invaders from west or east. The history of kingdoms with some records start around sixth century BC and we see almost entire Pakistan occupied by Persian Achaemenids. These Persians did not expand into gangetic plains at all but easily ruled over Punjab , Sindh and Gandhara for two centuries.
    When their rule ends, it is because of another foreign Macedonian invasion which crushes all opposition and establishes its rule over entire Pakistan, the same ruler could not ask his soldiers to attack India proper. The Greek rule would have lasted for far longer time but Mauryans from eastern India expelled them and instead ruled Pakistan for one century. Once Mauryans collapsed, the landmass of Pakistan once again became prey to invaders from west and Indo Greeks established their rule there. These Indo Greeks were then destroyed by Scythians and Parthians who subjugated Pakistan. kushans from Bactria invaded Pakistan and ruled over the landmass even when they had lost all their territories elsewhere. The eastern Indian Gupta Dynasty ruled parts of Pakistan in the 4th century. Then we have Kidarites, Hunas etc. From seventh century , most of Punjab was under Kashmir while sindh was too small to mean much. In the 8th century major part of Pakistan was conquered by the Arabs who failed to invade India because they were defeated by the south Indian Chalukya Dynasty and north Indian Pratihara Dynasty.

    From 11th century till 1180s, Pakistan was ruled by Ghazanavids who were Turks and massacred lot of Pakistani tribes like jats and Ghakkars. They were replaced by Khiljis, Tughlaqs all Turkic dynasties. In the 13th century parts of Pakistan was ruled by the Mongols. In mid fifteenth century Pakistan was occupied by Afghans in form of Lodis. As history repeats itself, this foreign rule was ended by another foreigner Babur who established Mughal dynasty, Mughals ruled for two centuries. After decline of Mughals( in which Pakistanis played no role) Afghans under Durrani occupied Pakistan. The afghan rule was ended by Sikhs who were a minority in Pakistan. The atrocious Sikh rule was ended by British and British rule ended in 1947. So as one can see we do not have a single strong kingdom from Pakistan in this period of 2500 years, Pakistan was occupied by either invaders from west or those from east.

    Why were the people from eastern India and southern India able to establish some of the greatest Dynasties in South Asian history while the people of Pakistan failed to produce even one native Kingdom.
    Achaemenids, Greeks, Mauryans,Indo Greeks, Scythians, Guptas, Kushans, Hunas,Pratiharas, Arabs, Ghazanavids, Ghurids, Mughals, Afghans etc. all were foreigner to Pakistan and ruled it easily.
     
  2. livingdead

    livingdead ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    22,953
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2011
    Ratings:
    +6 / 21,593 / -6
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    its not that bad.. they got better genes than us.. :p:
     
  3. Brahma Bull

    Brahma Bull BANNED

    Messages:
    269
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Ratings:
    +0 / 448 / -8
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    But i thought Ghauri,Ghaznavi,Babur were all pakistanis :(
     
  4. WAJsal

    WAJsal MODERATOR

    Messages:
    7,769
    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2014
    Ratings:
    +212 / 13,423 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    SO?
     
  5. Sher Shah Awan

    Sher Shah Awan SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    6,666
    Joined:
    May 8, 2013
    Ratings:
    +25 / 11,348 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Cause we wanted to allow the foreigners to enrich our genes....:whistle:
     
  6. Sheikh Rauf

    Sheikh Rauf SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    4,736
    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2014
    Ratings:
    +0 / 3,344 / -9
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Qatar
    Oh not again .. another desperate effort of Indian...
    dont you guys really have anything els to do other than critisizing Pakistan or its Existance.. i am surprise indian stablishment really thing people will buy this Crap.
    ever invader what ever you called end up in Bharat.. there was no india and even now india means natives who are third class citizen either its bharat or hindustan.. so invders have change bharaties..

    really ! are you allowed to marry with your siblings?
     
  7. SuperSubrayan

    SuperSubrayan FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    266
    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2015
    Ratings:
    +0 / 234 / -0
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    Bahrain
    And who are these so called pakistanis in your so called 2500 history Pakistan . And so called pakistanis tribes are Hindus. Isn't it ?
     
  8. Brahma Bull

    Brahma Bull BANNED

    Messages:
    269
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Ratings:
    +0 / 448 / -8
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    No need of history lecture from a person who believes that Bin-Qasim was the first Pakistani :rofl:
     
  9. ZooZoo

    ZooZoo BANNED

    Messages:
    521
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2015
    Ratings:
    +0 / 425 / -4
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    They are rapist of there ancestors.. Better listen to Hassan Nissar , He expose these Arab-Turk Animals...
     
  10. Sheikh Rauf

    Sheikh Rauf SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    4,736
    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2014
    Ratings:
    +0 / 3,344 / -9
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Qatar
    Hindu is not a tribe learn first .. and the person who been critisizing Pakistan with past 2500 years of histroy you sud bang him than come here and be a cry baby.
    i literally see your facts and intelligent level .. and now understand your education level ...two words for you if you are hindu
    Brain washed!

    who knows Hassan nisar is your father or somthing who knows every hindu quote him.. sudden love dont make sence beautiful.
     
  11. TSA321

    TSA321 FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    167
    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2014
    Ratings:
    +0 / 105 / -0
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Sikh empire?
     
  12. ZooZoo

    ZooZoo BANNED

    Messages:
    521
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2015
    Ratings:
    +0 / 425 / -4
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India


    Pakistan history is just 60 years.. So please don't exaggerate it.. No need to make Pakistan important as if it existed even 100 years ago...

    It was India.. And there are many native Indain kingdom which existed... Sikh, Mauryas, Rajputana, Marathas and many more...
     
  13. Sher Shah Awan

    Sher Shah Awan SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    6,666
    Joined:
    May 8, 2013
    Ratings:
    +25 / 11,348 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    India didn't exist until 1947. The sub continent is a melting pot of different but related nationalities. Get over your Pakistani obsession, we were never Indian since as I explained, India didn't exist until 1947.
     
  14. Brahma Bull

    Brahma Bull BANNED

    Messages:
    269
    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Ratings:
    +0 / 448 / -8
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    Yeah :lol:
    British were mad to name it British India.
    Columbus was in search of sea route to India.He was a fool.He should have waited till 1947,because India didn't exist before that :rofl:
     
  15. Sheikh Rauf

    Sheikh Rauf SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    4,736
    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2014
    Ratings:
    +0 / 3,344 / -9
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Qatar
    First it was not india it was Bharat small part and hindustan which is Cuz of muslims.. all i see pure hindu mentality who skipped muslims from their history.. there were khilji. mughal.. ghazni turks what have you guys been smoking.. there were not sikh kindom
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.