What's new

'No, No America': Thousands of Iraqis rally against U.S. military presence

BHarwana

MODERATOR
Sep 24, 2016
24,828
20
38,342
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
How about Iran backed Militia in Iraq ?
In my understanding you are mixing Iraq with Syria. Yes in Iraq you can say there are militias which Iran backs in Iraq but they consist of Iraqi nationals. So they are Iraqis after all. Iran has influence over those militias I will not denounce that and Iran has created a state within a state I will agree to that as well but this state with in a state has helped Iraq get rid of isis. Iran has exploited the fact in short term this has helped Iran and Iraq and west as well to fight terror.
Yes state with in a state is problem but these militias are totally new where US presence is the region is more older and has negatively effected the region and these militias are a direct result of US presence.

Any ways found a video of the protest as well.

 

Shapur Zol Aktaf

SENIOR MEMBER
Feb 10, 2013
3,236
-6
4,732
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Location
Netherlands

EPCtwdrWAAAE3CW.jpg
 

Baz

FULL MEMBER
Mar 20, 2019
782
-1
730
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
oh yeah? americans will be scared now...lol ..these guys are wasting their energy...the top leadership is compromised, they are surrounded, saudis are compromised, entire ME 's behind is shattered....oh yeah keep trying
 

Beast

ELITE MEMBER
Feb 5, 2011
28,536
-47
64,910
Country
China
Location
China
How about Iran backed Militia in Iraq ?
Iran back militia are still Iraqi. Are you suggesting they shall be sent to Iran too?

While Americans are Americans. They don't belong to Iraq. Plus US brag themselves as defender of democracy and freedom. Now these Iraqi make their decision clear and US shall respect their decision and practice what they preach. Stop being selective and double standard.
 
Last edited:

Shapur Zol Aktaf

SENIOR MEMBER
Feb 10, 2013
3,236
-6
4,732
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Location
Netherlands
All the pro-zionist newspapers (Western, arab or whatever) are mentioning thousands of protesters.
Only exception (1 out of 100) is CNN, they mentioned hundreds of thousands protesters.
 

Ich

FULL MEMBER
Mar 14, 2018
1,010
-1
1,448
Country
Germany
Location
Germany
The difference is that those who protest against Iran and slaughtered by Khamenai thugs. At least 600 protesters were murdered.

As far as i know it were Mossad thugs who shot into the masses.


Edit:

Uhh, i mixed it up with Syria. Mh, sure some Mossad thugs are also in Irak.
 

925boy

SENIOR MEMBER
Sep 10, 2016
4,964
-30
5,579
Country
United States
Location
United States
Have seen similar protests against Iran
Iraqis asked Iran to leave while Iraqi parliament asked US to leave. Not the same thing imo.

Removing US will only give rise to ISIS 2.0
thats what the US military ALWAYS says...but its an excuse to stay in countries where there is no lawful justification to do so and just hide the neo-colonialism.

Iran and US, both should exit Iraq. Enough with foreign occupiers.
Thats the decision for Iraqis to make not you. US will still exit before Iran.

Fact is: there are no Iranian forces in Iraq.
Apparently there are still ~100 IRGC advisers in Iraq at the invitation of the IRaqi govt. Offcourse Iraqi govt wont tell them to "depart"..

How about Iran backed Militia in Iraq ?
Those arent Iranian forces, they are Iran-allied partner forces. They are Iraqis. Due to geography and history, Iran is never leaving Iraq, but US will.

Th At least 600 protesters were murdered.
Because they were foreign trained "civilians" (here you go AGAIN with your SYrian-type of propaganda) who had special missions to cripple the country economically. If this isnt true then pls explain why these same anarchist-lovers set over 700 banks on fire???

They set so many banks on fire because those were their instructions from their foreign handlers who trained them. The sanctions couldnt bring Iran to its knees so they thought destroying the countries banks and infrastructure would achieve the intended result.

Now waiting for your next propaganda lie..

Iran back militia are still Iraqi. Are you suggesting they shall be sent to Iran too?

While Americans are Americans. They don't belong to Iraq. Plus US brag themselves as defender of democracy and freedom. Now these Iraqi make their decision clear and US shall respect their decision and practice what they preach. Stop being selective and double standard.
perfect summary. cheers.

I am watching how all the Iran-hating + US-loving PDF members will react to this. US has been asked to leave, and if US doesnt leave what does that make the US???? oh, they dont want to say now....but they've been calling Iran that in Iraq all this while, while Iran had no uninvited troops in Iraq.
 

Lincoln

SENIOR MEMBER
Sep 2, 2018
5,846
20
8,177
Country
Pakistan
Location
Turkey
Iraqis asked Iran to leave while Iraqi parliament asked US to leave. Not the same thing imo.


thats what the US military ALWAYS says...but its an excuse to stay in countries where there is no lawful justification to do so and just hide the neo-colonialism.


Thats the decision for Iraqis to make not you. US will still exit before Iran.


Apparently there are still ~100 IRGC advisers in Iraq at the invitation of the IRaqi govt. Offcourse Iraqi govt wont tell them to "depart"..


Those arent Iranian forces, they are Iran-allied partner forces. They are Iraqis. Due to geography and history, Iran is never leaving Iraq, but US will.


Because they were foreign trained "civilians" (here you go AGAIN with your SYrian-type of propaganda) who had special missions to cripple the country economically. If this isnt true then pls explain why these same anarchist-lovers set over 700 banks on fire???

They set so many banks on fire because those were their instructions from their foreign handlers who trained them. The sanctions couldnt bring Iran to its knees so they thought destroying the countries banks and infrastructure would achieve the intended result.

Now waiting for your next propaganda lie..


perfect summary. cheers.

I am watching how all the Iran-hating + US-loving PDF members will react to this. US has been asked to leave, and if US doesnt leave what does that make the US???? oh, they dont want to say now....but they've been calling Iran that in Iraq all this while, while Iran had no uninvited troops in Iraq.

Iraqi Parliament is a sham. If it is truly the people's government then they should hold a vote.

People want you all gone.
 

925boy

SENIOR MEMBER
Sep 10, 2016
4,964
-30
5,579
Country
United States
Location
United States
Iraqi Parliament is a sham. If it is truly the people's government then they should hold a vote.

People want you all gone.
How can the Iraqi parliament be a sham when it was this same "SHAM" that allowed US troops into Iraq in the first place? you hate to hear you're wrong!
 

LeGenD

MODERATOR
Aug 28, 2006
13,347
110
16,493
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
How can the Iraqi parliament be a sham when it was this same "SHAM" that allowed US troops into Iraq in the first place? you hate to hear you're wrong!
Do you realize that Iraqi Sunni and Kurd parliamentarians boycotted this vote? Do you understand potential implications of this boycott?

Iraq might disintegrate due to foolishness of Iraqi Shia nationals. These people are playing with fire in this matter. Country-wide consensus for their demand is non-existent; Iraqi Sunni and Kurd are increasingly uncomfortable with Iraqi Shia groups being subservient to Iran.
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom