• Thursday, August 6, 2020

No doubt China has confidence in its HQ-9s

Discussion in 'Chinese Defence Forum' started by kristisipe, Oct 3, 2013.

  1. kristisipe

    kristisipe FULL MEMBER

    New Recruit

    Messages:
    56
    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Ratings:
    +0 / 269 / -0
    Country:
    Taiwan, Province Of China
    Location:
    United States
    Bayar said a delegation of Turkish industry and air force officials had witnessed test launches from all the firms but that the Chinese had allowed Turkey to pick its own scenario and offered it a tailored demonstration.

    "We said we want this kind of a launch, and our delegation watched the launches as if they were the operators. These were real launches," Bayar said.

    finance. yahoo . com /news/turkey-highly-likely-sign-chinese-070814678.html
     
  2. EagleEyes

    EagleEyes ADMINISTRATOR

    Messages:
    16,778
    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Ratings:
    +25 / 15,623 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United States
    Is there anything more superior to HQ-9 in the Chinese inventory?

    Anything in development?
     
  3. Superboy

    Superboy BANNED

    Messages:
    6,298
    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2013
    Ratings:
    +1 / 1,971 / -8
    Country:
    Canada
    Location:
    Canada
    HQ-9 is a 1980s system. The version Turkey is getting is FD-2000. Not sure when they had HT-233 phased array radar.
     
  4. copasi

    copasi FULL MEMBER

    New Recruit

    Messages:
    51
    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2013
    Ratings:
    +0 / 22 / -0
    This kind of promotion seems cool
     
  5. hk299792458

    hk299792458 FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,379
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2011
    Ratings:
    +8 / 1,934 / -0
    Country:
    France
    Location:
    France
    It makes no sense to say "superior". Each SAM answers to a particular category of threat (and so target).

    In it's category, means long rang high altitude focusing on flying platform with limited ABM ability, China has -9A for example. It seems that -9B is a naval version but not sure.

    In other categories :

    * PAC-3 MSE like = HQ-29
    * THAAD like = HQ-19
    * SM-3 like = HQ-26
    * GBI like = DN-2

    HQ-8, a 400km range anti-radiation liquid-solid mix ramjet SAM, is quit an exception. This missile is développed by 2nd academy of CASIC and assembled by n°283 factory. If someone find it's equivalence I would appreciate.

    Henri K.
     
  6. Therealtruth

    Therealtruth BANNED

    New Recruit

    Messages:
    90
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2013
    Ratings:
    +0 / 39 / -0
    Nice piece of hardware but its simply no match for Russian analogs.
     
  7. 帅的一匹

    帅的一匹 ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    12,623
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2012
    Ratings:
    +11 / 18,047 / -15
    Country:
    China
    Location:
    China
    FYI,Russian's bid was wiped out at the first round.

    HQ26 ASAT, gonna be set in TYPE 055 destroyer
     
  8. Therealtruth

    Therealtruth BANNED

    New Recruit

    Messages:
    90
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2013
    Ratings:
    +0 / 39 / -0
    That doesnt really mean much. It just means the Chinese offered them a better deal. I dont think anyone can really argue that Russia has far more superior equipment than the Chinese. Im just talking about facts. I know you are Chinese therefore there tends to be an inherent bias in your position. Its only natural.
     
  9. sincity

    sincity FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,943
    Joined:
    May 8, 2013
    Ratings:
    +0 / 832 / -13
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    That doesnt really mean much. It just means the Chinese offered them a better deal. I dont think anyone can really argue that Russia has far more superior equipment than the Chinese. Im just talking about facts. I know you are Chinese therefore there tends to be an inherent bias in your position. Its only natural.




    No nation spend 3 to 4 billions dollars to acquire a ineffective and inferior weapons, 3 to 4 billions dollars offer price by China cheaper compare to Russia and US but these system still cost up to billions dollars for Turkey to buy from China.
     
  10. Therealtruth

    Therealtruth BANNED

    New Recruit

    Messages:
    90
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2013
    Ratings:
    +0 / 39 / -0
    You can make any inference you want. It is my opinion that Russian technology is vastly superior to Chinese technology. Not as good as American technology either. But that is just my opinion.
     
  11. hk299792458

    hk299792458 FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,379
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2011
    Ratings:
    +8 / 1,934 / -0
    Country:
    France
    Location:
    France
    No

    Turkey 'highly likely' to sign Chinese missile deal | Reuters

    Henri K.
     
  12. Lightningbolt

    Lightningbolt BANNED

    Messages:
    755
    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2013
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,110 / -0
    Hang on, wasn't the DN-1 the LOW-EARTH ground-based interceptor and the DN-2 the HIGH-EARTH ground-based interceptor?

    @Henri
     
  13. Beast

    Beast ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    19,743
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Ratings:
    +7 / 47,336 / -43
    Country:
    China
    Location:
    China
    You biased opinion is irelevant. Russia indeed do still retain some weapon platform advantage which we do not have. But so do Russia in regards to China. Russian until now has not even put a modern destroyer with powerful phased array radar and modular VLS into service.
     
  14. Therealtruth

    Therealtruth BANNED

    New Recruit

    Messages:
    90
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2013
    Ratings:
    +0 / 39 / -0
    i respect your opinion but humbly disagree. I am not Russian so I have no Russian bias, you on the other hand are Chinese so you obviously are going to have Chinese bias.

    What I can say is this. Russia sells weapons to China. China doesnt sell any weapons to Russia.
     
  15. faithfulguy

    faithfulguy ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    13,064
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Ratings:
    +2 / 13,370 / -3
    Country:
    Taiwan, Province Of China
    Location:
    United States
    At this time, its clear that Russia is still more advance in China in military technology. Until China is head and shoulders above everyone else besides the US in military technology, its too early to compare China with the US.