• Wednesday, May 22, 2019

MPs seek to censor the media - UK Politics

Discussion in 'World Affairs' started by pkpatriotic, Nov 10, 2008.

  1. pkpatriotic

    pkpatriotic SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,317
    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2008
    Ratings:
    +0 / 925 / -0
    :smokin:MPs seek to censor the media - UK Politics
    Exclusive by Kim Sengupta
    Monday, 10 November 2008


    Britain's security agencies and police would be given unprecedented and legally binding powers to ban the media from reporting matters of national security, under proposals being discussed in Whitehall. :lol::smokin:

    The Intelligence and Security Committee, the parliamentary watchdog of the intelligence and security agencies which has a cross-party membership from both Houses, wants to press ministers to introduce legislation that would prevent news outlets from reporting stories deemed by the Government to be against the interests of national security.

    The committee also wants to censor reporting of police operations that are deemed to have implications for national security. The ISC is to recommend in its next report, out at the end of the year, that a commission be set up to look into its plans, according to senior Whitehall sources.

    The ISC holds huge clout within Whitehall. It receives secret briefings from MI5, MI6 and GCHQ and is highly influential in forming government policy. Kim Howells, a respected former Foreign Office minister, was recently appointed its chairman. Under the existing voluntary code of conduct, known as the DA-Notice system, the Government can request that the media does not report a story. However, the committee's members are particularly worried about leaks, which, they believe, could derail investigations and the reporting of which needs to be banned by legislation.

    Civil liberties groups say these restrictions would be "very dangerous" and "damaging for public accountability". They also point out that censoring journalists when the leaks come from officials is unjustified.

    But the committee, in its last annual report, has already signalled its intention to press for changes. It states: "The current system for handling national security information through DA-Notices and the [intelligence and security] Agencies' relationship with the media more generally, is not working as effectively as it might and this is putting lives at risk." According to senior Whitehall sources the ISC is likely to advocate tighter controls on the DA-Notice system – formerly known as D-Notice – which operates in co-operation and consultation between the Government and the media.

    The committee has focused on one particular case to highlight its concern: an Islamist plot to kidnap and murder a British serviceman in 2007, during which reporters were tipped off about the imminent arrest of suspects in Birmingham, a security operation known as "Gamble". The staff in the office of the then home secretary, John Reid, and the local police were among those accused of being responsible – charges they denied. An investigation by Scotland Yard failed to find the source of the leak.

    The then director general of MI5, Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller, was among those who complained to the ISC. "We were very angry, but it is not clear who we should be angry with, that most of the story of the arrests in Op Gamble were in the media very, very fast ... So the case was potentially jeopardised by the exposure of what the story was. My officers and the police were jeopardised by them being on operations when the story broke. The strategy of the police for interrogating those arrested was blown out of the water, and my staff felt pretty depressed ... that this has happened."

    The ISC report said the DA-Notice system "provides advice and guidance to the media about defence and counter-terrorism information, whilst the system is voluntary, has no legal authority, and the final responsibility for deciding whether or not to publish rests solely with the editor or publisher concerned. The system has been effective in the past. However, the Cabinet Secretary told us ... this is no longer the case: 'I think we have problems now.'"

    The human rights lawyer Louise Christian said: "This would be a very dangerous development. We need media scrutiny for public accountability. We can see this from the example, for instance, of the PhD student in Nottingham who was banged up for six days without charge because he downloaded something from the internet for his thesis. The only reason this came to light was because of the media attention to the case."

    A spokesman for the human rights group Liberty said: "There is a difficult balance between protecting integrity and keeping the public properly informed. Any extension of the DA-Notice scheme requires a more open parliamentary debate."

    DA-Notice: a gagging by consent

    The D-Notice system was set up in 1912 when the War Office (the Ministry of Defence in its previous incarnation) began issuing censorship orders to newspapers on stories involving national security.

    In 1993 it became known as a DA-Notice with four senior civil servants, with an eminent military figure as secretary, and 13 members nominated by the media to form the Defence Press and Broadcasting Advisory Committee.

    Contrary to popular conception DA-Notices are a request and not legally enforceable. Civil servants fear making the agreement legally binding would lead to hostility from the media. There would be apprehension among journalists about new restrictions, as the committee has in recent times been robust in resisting pressure from the Government to send DA-Notices if it thinks the motives are political. At present most DA-Notices are issued regarding military missions, anti-terrorist operations at home and espionage.

    QUOTE:
    :lol: I really cudn't abrupt my smile even a loudly laugh upon seeing such news that the claimant of one of the biggest democracy and largest critics on thirld world countries for its social liberty, freedom of infos, balh blah etc, now what they are doing at their own end........:azn:

    I realised that some times goverments have to take few bitter steps as demended by the current senarios especially related to country security and intigrity....so what happend in UK .....it may be required certain step to bind "Media" for the mean while, but here i would like to remind the security agencies of western powers like MI6 that, they should learn the lesson now, and try to boost their moral values....to avoid fingering to penic the public on different issues like the "Binding of Media" (or some time the isses created by them selves in other countries) to develope chaos in the thirld world countries.......and try to behave as Big Brothers rather for the developing countries to promote peace in real sense.:cool:

    On other side such incident prove that, no where is real democracy now........even USA & UK are policies influenced by their Security agenciesi.e., CIA in US, while MI6 in UK have key role to establish hard & fast policies to run the repective governments off-course, its look obvious especially for foreign relations policies but these agencies keep on hijacking the peoples liberty in their respective countries in the name of security measures, and no one the CEO of governments can even think to go beyond their advises. ...so we should bother to reform and maintain policies at our own suited to us for our sovreignity and intigrity rather to have hopes with other countries especially the upcoming president of USA. Obama may be very good for USA as their elected president but he is supposed ot follow the rules advise by CIA, sponsored by strong Jewish lobby, so he may be more critical for us then Bush...... as such we should not bother Obama ..........but we should mind our own business.:smokin:
     
    Last edited: Nov 10, 2008