What's new

MOAB on a missile

313ghazi

ELITE MEMBER
Mar 14, 2017
8,013
36
15,542
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
Would putting a MOAB sized non nuclear war head on a short to medium range missile create an effective weapon? What would be its strategic value - if such a task was possible?
 

BHarwana

MODERATOR
Sep 24, 2016
24,815
20
38,276
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Would putting a MOAB sized non nuclear war head on a short to medium range missile create an effective weapon? What would be its strategic value - if such a task was possible?
I dont know of any fighter jets or bombers that can carry MOAB. Only known planes that can deliver MOAB to a target are Cargo Planes. In theory what you are saying is possible but it will require a heavy lift space rocket not conventional missiles.
 

Yaseen1

ELITE MEMBER
Apr 1, 2014
9,408
-5
8,721
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
i think only russian satan icbms can carry such high weight warheads,bombers like u.s b2 stealth bombers can carry 20 ton payload weapon
 

Trango Towers

ELITE MEMBER
Oct 29, 2016
14,519
-5
15,464
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Would putting a MOAB sized non nuclear war head on a short to medium range missile create an effective weapon? What would be its strategic value - if such a task was possible?
No as the whole point is to wipe out multiple targets. Would non nuclear warhead have that effect?
 

313ghazi

ELITE MEMBER
Mar 14, 2017
8,013
36
15,542
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
do u even know how much moab weights? its too heavy.
I dont know of any fighter jets or bombers that can carry MOAB. Only known planes that can deliver MOAB to a target are Cargo Planes. In theory what you are saying is possible but it will require a heavy lift space rocket not conventional missiles.
You would need a saturn 2 rocket to launch it and it would easily be shot down like an elephant on the dirt track.
I did have a google about how much it weighs and what the payload of missiles is. You'd need something the size of an icbm to launch it.

I also did wonder what that would them look like, whether it would be slow, cost effective and ultimately of any value? Wasn't sure so i thought it'd ask you lot. :)

No as the whole point is to wipe out multiple targets. Would non nuclear warhead have that effect?
I don't know. Would it do that? What impact would it have on airbase for example? I'm getting the feeling it was a dud idea...
 

Trango Towers

ELITE MEMBER
Oct 29, 2016
14,519
-5
15,464
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
I did have a google about how much it weighs and what the payload of missiles is. You'd need something the size of an icbm to launch it.

I also did wonder what that would them look like, whether it would be slow, cost effective and ultimately of any value? Wasn't sure so i thought it'd ask you lot. :)



I don't know. Would it do that? What impact would it have on airbase for example? I'm getting the feeling it was a dud idea...
Again yo takeout a whole airbase you will need a nuke
 

Fawadqasim1

SENIOR MEMBER
Jan 24, 2017
4,242
1
3,366
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Would putting a MOAB sized non nuclear war head on a short to medium range missile create an effective weapon? What would be its strategic value - if such a task was possible?
An easier and cheaper way would be to fly a Moab size thermobaric device like a terrain hugging cruise missile. As far as our thermobaric warheads are concerned they are far far smaller in size and strength than Moab so
 

Zarvan

ELITE MEMBER
Apr 28, 2011
50,480
81
55,758
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
What Pakistan should do is and I have suggested in for some time now is that put our scientist on work ask them to develop a conventional war head whose destructive power is 20 to 30 times more than any current warheads which we use in our Cruise Missiles. For imagine what we use these days if its 400 KG causes a massive destruction the new warhead should be able to do that with 50 KG.
 

Fawadqasim1

SENIOR MEMBER
Jan 24, 2017
4,242
1
3,366
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
What Pakistan should do is and I have suggested in for some time now is that put our scientist on work ask them to develop a conventional war head whose destructive power is 20 to 30 times more than any current warheads which we use in our Cruise Missiles. For imagine what we use these days if its 400 KG causes a massive destruction the new warhead should be able to do that with 50 KG.
Zarvan bro everyone is trying to achieve what you are contemplating but there are some physical/chemical limits on it in the current state of science and technology
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom