• Friday, December 14, 2018

Jawaharlal Nehru-led Congress, not Muhammad Ali Jinnah was responsible for Partition: Farooq Abdulla

Discussion in 'Social & Current Events' started by MultaniGuy, Mar 6, 2018.

  1. Kabira

    Kabira ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    11,867
    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2014
    Ratings:
    +12 / 9,211 / -28
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Put Nehru picture on Pakistani currency, thank you.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  2. SmartGeek

    SmartGeek SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,915
    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2013
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,907 / -0
    Khawarij aka terrorists are not considered Muslims the moment they decide to kill the innocent people. Given Indian-funded Afghan-based Terrorist-outfit aka TTP that is responsible for more than 100,000 death in Pakistan, genocide on large scale in Indian Occupied Kashmir and the gujarat genocide that alone put Modi on the power along with his political party rampaging Muslims everywhere in the name of beef laws which most of allegations lacked concrete evidence to back with doesn't exactly present ideal scenario for Muslims at all.

    It is like India wants Islam/Muslims removed from the facet of the earth. Pakistan exists to keep India on toe.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  3. ziaulislam

    ziaulislam SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    7,883
    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2010
    Ratings:
    +9 / 4,703 / -2
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United States
    Jinnah gave two option
    1. either accept cabinet mission(unchanged, non negotiable)
    2. or partition
    congress accepted partition

    congress gave option of modifying cabinet mission to make 1/4 in center and remove clause of grouping provinces

    Gandhi was here in of opinion to accept Jinnah conditions but he was sidelined, Nehru convinced his people in congress that Pakistan cannot exist and will collapse on its own

    two alternatives might have happened
    1. congress(nehru) and BJP (Patel) accepts cabinet mission
    correct without nehru Pakistan would have been either non existent with loose Indian federation(which would have been theoretically be an ideal state, had both congress/BJP been purely secular) or
    pakistan/ separate federation among the three groups(per clause) would have formed later

    this however would have meant a much more tolerant india and pakistan with no major migrations and open boarders, and no large minorities in pakistan

    2. BJP/congress forces hand of British govt to annul partition
    this would meant short term large riots and long term it would meant complete suppression of Muslim a as
    society
    , much much worse than what we see in india today as whole regions would have been in poverty, you would not seen western punjab developed at all or sindh gotten so much irrigation that it got after partition, or ho wbengal developed rapidly from 1947-71 and so on
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  4. ProphetX

    ProphetX BANNED

    Messages:
    126
    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2017
    Ratings:
    +0 / 67 / -0
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    United States
    If Indians wanted to wipe off muslims, they would have done so, like Pakistan did with its minorities, not let Muslims increase in numbers to the point they are increasing faster than the rest of the religions in India combined .

    Meanwhile if your reason for existence is to keep.india on its toes, that means you are just a sidekick to us and will always be..:lol:
     
  5. MultaniGuy

    MultaniGuy ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    8,595
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2017
    Ratings:
    +4 / 7,882 / -4
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Canada
    nice try. Pakistan will never be a sidekick to India. LOL. Pakistanis hate or don't care about Indians.

    Regardless,

    I think partition was the right thing to do. There was no other way to solve the communal problem.
     
  6. ProphetX

    ProphetX BANNED

    Messages:
    126
    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2017
    Ratings:
    +0 / 67 / -0
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    United States
    Ain't my try, some Pakistanis like the one who I quoted certainly think so, take it up with them,
     
  7. MultaniGuy

    MultaniGuy ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    8,595
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2017
    Ratings:
    +4 / 7,882 / -4
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Canada
    No
    No, you are the one who mentioned sidekick. All Pakistanis hate India.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  8. ProphetX

    ProphetX BANNED

    Messages:
    126
    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2017
    Ratings:
    +0 / 67 / -0
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    United States
    If Pakistan's raison de etre is to keep India on its toes as mentioned by your compatriot , you derive your validation from india, makes you a sidekick..

    How hard is that logic to understand beats me, or is it you have trouble with basic logic?
     
  9. MultaniGuy

    MultaniGuy ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    8,595
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2017
    Ratings:
    +4 / 7,882 / -4
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Canada
    sidekick means being a support. Pakistan is not a support but a enemy of India.

    Didn't I tell you Pakistanis hate Indians! :lol:
     
  10. ProphetX

    ProphetX BANNED

    Messages:
    126
    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2017
    Ratings:
    +0 / 67 / -0
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    United States
    I'm not here to give you an education on meanings and usage, if you wanted one you should have gone to a school.
     
  11. M.AsfandYar

    M.AsfandYar FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    877
    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2013
    Ratings:
    +0 / 535 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Salam
    I would also like to know your thought too.
     
  12. SmartGeek

    SmartGeek SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,915
    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2013
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,907 / -0
    Indians are already doing that taking mass oppression in Indian Occupied Kashmir and genocide on the large scale in India. Before 1947, it was ruled by British Kingdom. Before that, Muslims ruled over India for centurions. If they wanted, they could have wiped Hindus from the facet of the earth.

    And the minority are relatively safer and is increase from 1947. The reason the minority population was higher because East Pakistan aka Bangladesh was taken into the account which had highest minority population. Without East Pakistan from 1947 to now, the minority population is still increase.

    And minority in Pakistan don't have to worry about genocidal Prime Minister whereas Muslims do have to worry about Genocidal Modi [which is legitimized by India] and his political communal party into the account. Not to mention, Ajit Doval, in-charge of Indian NSA, that is responsible for more than 100,000 deaths in Pakistan including children and women.

    Clearly, reading comprehension might be issue for you.

    Let me try the version that you may understand;

    Indian is crying because India cannot take its land back [Azad Kashmir and Pakistan]. And India is losing more population to Islam.

    Every times India tries to take over ends up taking backseat because Pakistan is not afraid to reply. India and its father [USA] which the same old story over crying about Pakistan for the umpteenth times already given the period from 1947 to now. It is getting embarrassing. :D
     
    Last edited: Mar 10, 2018
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  13. Verve

    Verve SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    6,207
    Joined:
    May 15, 2014
    Ratings:
    +1 / 6,313 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Pakistan was destined to be and it is. Jinnah succeeded in only what he was destined to succeed at.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  14. MultaniGuy

    MultaniGuy ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    8,595
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2017
    Ratings:
    +4 / 7,882 / -4
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Canada
    Partition happened, better for Indians to accept it and move on! Partition was for the best. I am extremely grateful for it.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  15. SmartGeek

    SmartGeek SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,915
    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2013
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,907 / -0
    I wouldn't say partition was the best thing happened. It was necessary move or else parish. It was do or die situation. What Jinnah (R.A) did was the last resort [made choice for him] which is in accordance to the principle of Islam. Drastic measure should be taken with everything into consideration at the last resort.

    If it wasn't for Nehru, that last resort wouldn't have come into the picture. Bear in mind, millions of people died due to the result of partition. Sometimes i wonder how many people would have died in the daily communal riots had partition not happened. Despite the partition, people are dying everyday in the communal riots whether in India or Indian Occupied Kashmir. Daily communal riots is averted to the certain portion which now we call Pakistan. Whereas for India, it is still on and on the large scale in the name of beef laws as the triggered by the election of Genocidal Modi with the majority support of the public and their hatred for Islam. It cannot be coincidence why they were majority voters for Donald Trump in USA.
     
    Last edited: Mar 11, 2018
    • Thanks Thanks x 1