What's new

Israeli minister sees possible attack on Iran "in 2-3 years"

Stryker1982

SENIOR MEMBER
Oct 5, 2016
4,537
-2
7,893
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Location
Canada
Looking at Israel's history never in the history Israel attacked it's opponent with an announcement, they always silently attacked it's enemies while they were asleep and achieved it's objective e.g Iraq nuclear plants
I don't know whats this gimmick like giving Iran 2-3 years to fully prepare itself
In 2-3 years Iran might have hypersonic missiles , Russian jets s400 or even s500
That's how you know it's BS.

If they are talking very loudly, it means nothing will happen. It's when they are very quiet, thats when you should be alert.
 

Stryker1982

SENIOR MEMBER
Oct 5, 2016
4,537
-2
7,893
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Location
Canada
download.jpg
 

Sineva

SENIOR MEMBER
May 24, 2018
4,006
-2
9,784
Country
Australia
Location
Korea, Democratic Peoples Republic Of
*Israel blows up hundreds of Iranians in Syria and Iraq including a bunch of officers and generals, kills its top scientists, engineers and generals inside Iran*
Yeah,and how did that work out for you guys?,because it looks to me like it back fired pretty spectacularly with iran responding by producing uranium metal and 60% enrichment.
Whats the bet that another little act of israeli/western stupidity like that will get you 90% enrichment,hmmm?
Irans still in syria and with russias preoccupations with the ukraine irans role in syria is now more important than ever.
Looks to me like your desperation is showing. :azn:
 

Solidify

FULL MEMBER
Jan 22, 2021
1,636
-3
1,393
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
1st Nuclear strike by Isreal
would get 1 major Iranian City destroyed completely
iran_map.jpg


2nd Strike by Iranian Ballistic missiles on Isreal Small Area of square meters land area would virtually allow Iran to annihilate Isreal all major Nuke sites, invasion of military forces initiate on Isreal Via Iraq Jordan Syria when they probably would allow Iranians to march on after Nuclear bomb on Iran. With Isreal insignificant population Iran would invade with ease.
Political-Map-of-Israel copy.jpg
 

Stryker1982

SENIOR MEMBER
Oct 5, 2016
4,537
-2
7,893
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Location
Canada
*Israel blows up hundreds of Iranians in Syria and Iraq including a bunch of officers and generals, kills its top scientists, engineers and generals inside Iran*
Not 100, or 1000 airstrikes or other covert activities have derailed any progress on the nuclear front.

1st Nuclear strike by Isreal
would get 1 major Iranian City destroyed completely
View attachment 910908

2nd Strike by Iranian Ballistic missiles on Isreal Small Area of square meters land area would virtually allow Iran to annihilate Isreal all major Nuke sites, invasion of military forces initiate on Isreal Via Iraq Jordan Syria when they probably would allow Iranians to march on after Nuclear bomb on Iran. With Isreal insignificant population Iran would invade with ease.
View attachment 910909
Really nice maps by the way
 

Beny Karachun

BANNED
May 30, 2016
6,034
-37
3,374
Country
Israel
Location
Israel
1st Nuclear strike by Isreal
would get 1 major Iranian City destroyed completely
View attachment 910908

2nd Strike by Iranian Ballistic missiles on Isreal Small Area of square meters land area would virtually allow Iran to annihilate Isreal all major Nuke sites, invasion of military forces initiate on Isreal Via Iraq Jordan Syria when they probably would allow Iranians to march on after Nuclear bomb on Iran. With Isreal insignificant population Iran would invade with ease.
View attachment 910909
Lol, what makes you think Iran will survive an Israeli nuclear strike?

Also ballistic missiles won't do shit Iran doesn't have enough of them to really hurt Israel and Israeli nuke sites are very deep underground

Iranian invasion because of insignificant Israeli population? LMAO that's what the Arabs said every time before we beat them
 

ThunderCat

SENIOR MEMBER
Jul 29, 2009
2,234
-2
1,311
Why are you against Iranians attaining nukes?

They are quite hostile towards Pakistanis, both as a government and many people. They are closely allied with India and have ties to Shia terror groups in Pakistan.

On top of that they are a signatory to banning nukes and are also a mullah state. We might as well be okay with Saudis or the Taliban owning nukes. Simply no.

There's even an article called "why a nuclear Iran is not in Pakistan's interest."
 

Bleek

SENIOR MEMBER
Dec 21, 2021
5,973
6
7,489
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
They are quite hostile towards Pakistanis, both as a government and many people. They are closely allied with India and have ties to Shia terror groups in Pakistan.

On top of that they are a signatory to banning nukes and are also a mullah state. We might as well be okay with Saudis or the Taliban owning nukes. Simply no.

There's even an article called "why a nuclear Iran is not in Pakistan's interest."
I agree with you
 

Hack-Hook

ELITE MEMBER
Jan 11, 2012
18,595
3
16,720
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Location
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
I agree with you
They are quite hostile towards Pakistanis, both as a government and many people. They are closely allied with India and have ties to Shia terror groups in Pakistan.

On top of that they are a signatory to banning nukes and are also a mullah state. We might as well be okay with Saudis or the Taliban owning nukes. Simply no.

There's even an article called "why a nuclear Iran is not in Pakistan's interest."
clearly show sectarian mindset .
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom