• Tuesday, January 28, 2020

IRIAF | News and Discussions

Discussion in 'Iranian Defence Forum' started by SOHEIL, Apr 11, 2013.

  1. VEVAK

    VEVAK SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,014
    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2013
    Ratings:
    +1 / 2,630 / -0
    In short those sanctions can ONLY be removed if the U.S. agrees to their removal and the Trump Administration is NOT going to do that. Simply put Iran's Defense industry today is too independent and that makes it too big of a threat to the U.S. & EU weapons sales.

    U.S. sells it's Humvee's for $200K- +$1 Million USD per unit
    It's Javelin ATGM for $180,000 USD
    It's RQ-7 & Scan Eagles go for anywhere between $800K-$3.5M
    MQ-1's from $4M-$20Million USD

    Iran currently may not be able to produce F-22's, F-35's, Apache's and a long list of other more complex US weapons systems but there is still a rather long list of weapon systems that Iran can produce and sell at a fraction of what the American's charge. And that's just what Iran can do today and the greatest threat to them would be what would happen 10-20 years after the sanctions are removed because that opens the door for Iran to get into joint Defense projects with countries like Russia, China, Turkey, Iraq, Pakistan.... and if that happens countries like Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt,... who currently spend over $100 Billion a year on American Weapons will most definitely look across their boarders and weak up and prefer to invest in Asian(continent) defense industries over the overpriced weapons they are currently paying for....

    Today the Saudi's are outspending Russia and every country in Europe on weapons acquisition and yet they don't have a single Aircraft carrier or a single Helo Carrier or single +1,000 ton Submarine or a single subsonic or supersonic bomber or a single stealth aircraft or a viable space program,.... to show for it.
    If Iran had matched what the Saudis have spent over the past decade alone today Iran's military would have built and would have been equipped with it's own Helo Carrier's, a fleet of Missile Cruisers, at fleet of +1,500 ton diesel subs, would have started a production line of a fighter platform superior to the F-15 with over 200 fighter jets produced so far + plans for a real 5th gen fighter in the works, Iran would have built it's own supersonic bomber,.... hell with that much money Iran today would have even paid for it's own orbital space station.... And I'm not trying to say Iran is somehow special because if it was Turkey or Pakistan or Poland or North Korea or South Africa or Brazil or Sweden..... who had spent that much money on their own defense industry it would have been the same.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 6
  2. Hassan Al-Somal

    Hassan Al-Somal FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    792
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2015
    Ratings:
    +1 / 1,168 / -0
    Country:
    Somalia
    Location:
    Somalia

    It can also carry Fakour-90 air-to-air missile, according to the reports that I've seen in the Internet. If it is true, with the data link that can communicate with radars on the ground, Kowsar is a potent fighter jet.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  3. TheImmortal

    TheImmortal SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,044
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2017
    Ratings:
    +1 / 3,436 / -11
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    F-5 is not ment to be sent to fight air superiority fighters. It will get torched.


    Doubtful that Iran would be able to upgrade the F-5 past what Brazil has done with their F-5’s. So I would consider that the ceiling.

    Kowsar also lights up like a Christmas tree on newer stealth detecting airborne radars that SU-35’s are being equipped with.

    100 Iranian SU-35’s flying in home territory (Iran) with S-300, Bacar 373, Khordads, etc backing up will be challenging to any adversary.
     
  4. TruthHurtz

    TruthHurtz BANNED

    Messages:
    1,100
    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2016
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,288 / -22
    Country:
    Zimbabwe
    Location:
    Zimbabwe
    SAM systems and fighter jets are two completely different species. There is no evidence that Kowsar is anything but an upgraded F-5, the "production line" seen in the unveiling video isn't indicative of anything because it doesn't show the process of the actual jet being manufactured from the ground up.
     
  5. Mr Iran Eye

    Mr Iran Eye FULL MEMBER

    New Recruit

    Messages:
    99
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2019
    Ratings:
    +0 / 233 / -0
    Country:
    Canada
    Location:
    Canada

    Thank you ! it seems here that people do not know how to think, it's too hard. We can clearly see that they have made a new cell, a new cockpit and more. No country will show every stage of manufacturing in the details because you have to keep some secrets.

    This is a very new rumor that people underestimate Iran. And I repeat that for 1 year, there have been spectacular advances on the plane, wait for more ...

    And to say that an all-powerful Su-35 is, would be stronger than 7 Kowsar coming from all directions is a total delirium. And it is clear that the Kowsar will be equipped with new missile that will work with are new radar. The Kowsar becomes more vulnerable outside the country but to defend Iran with ground link as you say, the plane becomes powerful. at the tactical level, do not take it to the light
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  6. Sina-1

    Sina-1 FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    527
    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2016
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,604 / -0
    Country:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Location:
    Sweden
    I did not mention f5 as an alternative. My post was regarding the radar system of jas39 Gripen which is fielded as a sukhoi killer in Sweden. However not alone, but together with multiple air and ground radar assets. Gripen is an interesting concept for Iran because it is the same weight class as f20 (which is based on f5).
    Saab makes the case that they can overcome any adversary by relying on numbers. Stealthier craft is for example much easier to detect by illuminating it from various angles. By datalink communication both ground and air assets can then engage the threat even though an individual air asset on paper has an inferior avionics spec.


    Maybe not upgrade. But a derivative design is interesting.
    I would pick a self produced Gripen/f20 like concept in numbers of 1000-2000 any day of the week. Deadlier and more reliable.
     
    Last edited: Nov 26, 2019
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  7. TheImmortal

    TheImmortal SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,044
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2017
    Ratings:
    +1 / 3,436 / -11
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    If we are going to have a discussion please do not throw nonsense numbers like 1000-2000 aircraft.

    Gripen
    Range: 2,019 mi
    Wingspan: 28′ 0″
    Unit cost: 40,000,000–60,000,000 USD
    Program cost: US$ 13.54 billion (2006)
    Engine type: Turbofan
    Manufacturers: Saab AB, BAE Systems

    Even if we say fantasy wise, Iran could build this program at 50% cost of SaaB and 50% of cost per aircraft for procurement.....

    To equip 1000 planes at cost of 20 million per aircraft (absurdly cheap) that’s 20 billion dollars PLUS r&d of let’s say 7-8 billion puts you at close to 30 Billion dollars without pilot training/maintenance expenses/infrastructure support which will kick it up to 40 billion dollars.

    consider that Iran’s ANNUAL military budget is less than 20 billion dollars and the air force budget is less than half a billion.

    Never mind that Iran can’t actually build such a plane as the Gripen is TWICE as fast as an F-5. Forget radar, armament, and titanium in this discussion.

    Iran is better off securing SU-30 production license and engine license production and building its future planes off of that.
     
  8. TruthHurtz

    TruthHurtz BANNED

    Messages:
    1,100
    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2016
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,288 / -22
    Country:
    Zimbabwe
    Location:
    Zimbabwe
    The dreaming and fantasies in this thread have indeed approached absurdity. Lot of numbers being thrown around the no thinking.
     
  9. Sina-1

    Sina-1 FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    527
    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2016
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,604 / -0
    Country:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Location:
    Sweden
    Nonsense huh? Peace-time Sweden operates 200 gripens. A country with 1/10th of Irans population, in safe-heaven Europe, Sweden operates 200 and you think 1000-2000 is fantasy numbers for Iran with threats from literally all directions. Wow!

    Hate to break it to you but production cost and price are totally different things. It does not cost SAAB to produce gripens at 60 000 000 USD. Far from it actually.
    As a point of reference, the prices for the Patriot system's missiles are between 1-6 million USD EACH.
    So do you think that Iranian A2A missiles cost 0.5-3 Million? Far from it.

    For a near closed loop economy like Irans, the only thing which truly is expensive is new technology. That is the only thing which needs to be developed (time-consuming) or bought from abroad. However as long as close to 100% of a system/product is developed within the borders of Iran then the production cost is a fraction of what would be in an open market scenario. Low production costs in Iran is well proven by Irans small military budget.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  10. yavar

    yavar SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    4,965
    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2013
    Ratings:
    +1 / 9,247 / -5
    we not buying any Tanks any way

    we have to try ,
    when it comes to engines we have tech of SU-35,
    but to get to level design and characteristics, body infrastructure, avionic we have to get your hand on something good to be able to catch up fast
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  11. TruthHurtz

    TruthHurtz BANNED

    Messages:
    1,100
    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2016
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,288 / -22
    Country:
    Zimbabwe
    Location:
    Zimbabwe
    Why not go for SU-57? Russia is literally going around offering TOT with no preconditions to potential buyers. Given the push for 5th gen fighters it makes sense that Iran could get ahead of the curve with a stealth fighter rather than a 4th gen stopgap.

    Russia seems pretty desperate to see some export orders, so you could use this to your advantage during negotiations to get a larger share of TOT than what is offered upfront. Like manufacturing the air frame by itself and importing critical components from Russia (like engines, avionics etc).

    Once that's done you could purchase rights to produce the air frame domestically like China did with their J-11 (SU-27 derivative) and focus all your efforts into developing the critical components you used to import from Russia.

    We already know that Iran can make avionics, turbojets and ejection seats so the tech barrier shouldn't be too difficult to overcome.

    This is a much better alternative than the ridiculous suggestions of some users. This can be done over the course of a decade at less than 10 billion, not too unreasonable given Iran's defence budget.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  12. Sineva

    Sineva FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,534
    Joined:
    May 24, 2018
    Ratings:
    +2 / 2,728 / -5
    Country:
    Australia
    Location:
    Korea, Democratic Peoples Republic Of
    The biggest problem in this regard is the unfortunate level of "reliable unreliability" of the russians,tho the cold war 2.0 that the west initiated over nato expansion does seem to offer some potential possibility of increased reliability vis a vis russia and iran,which sadly makes rouhani and zarifs failure to have the weapons embargo removed back in 2016 all the more tragic.Ultimately tho relying on the russians for after market support and backup ie spares/logistics is potentially still quite risky for iran under the circumstances which is why only complete license production makes any kind of sense and admittedly even that has risks.
    I think there are really only a couple of viable options for iran,one would be complete license production of the su30 ie airframe,engines,avionics,weapons,every nut,bolt and fastener produced in iran.This would really only be a realistic proposal in the event that iran was going to build a lot of them tho,ie not just a few dozen only to be a replacement for the f14,but as the new standard multirole aircraft for the airforce doing the job of pretty much everything else except for the su24s.This would allow for the rationalization of the air fleet and the replacement of the existing mishmash of mig29,f1,f4,f5 etc...
    Another option would be an indigenous iranian light fighter program along the lines of the fj17 or F-CK-1,tho this would require a considerable effort in terms of reengineering vital components like the RD-33/94 turbofan engine,the R-77 BVR missile and the indigenous development of systems such as digital fly by wire and PESA/AESA radars.The biggest problem here would be the airforce itself as its previous attempts at upgrades were pretty unsuccessful and it seems to prefer projects that may look or sound superficially impressive such as new build "improved" f5s or an airforce drone program,but the actual results were pretty disappointing.I`ve always wondered if the reasons for this was one of a lack of money and resources,a lack of trained personnel and project managers coupled with a lack of experience when it comes to successfully completing large projects or perhaps a culture of innate conservatism which is just unwilling to take risks and would instead prefer to exaggerate the scale and success of whatever projects are undertaken,such as the "new build F5s" which despite some basic improvements are still basically 1960s era guns and wvr only light fighters.I suspect its very likely a combination of all of the above sadly.
    Another option may be to just wait for chinese engine technology to catch up to the west and russia and to seriously consider buying chinese 5th gen machines like the j20 or j31 in another decade or so,tho another option would be 4th gen machines such as the j10 or j11.Sadly tho these days the chinese seem to be taking the same "reliably unreliable" approach as the russians......bit of a pity that,oh well...
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  13. skyshadow

    skyshadow SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    3,272
    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2017
    Ratings:
    +2 / 8,337 / -0
    Country:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Location:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    well well well look who is back after couple of years, the same plane that had one RD-33 engine which could indicate Iran still wants to build it which again could indicate Iran has reverse engineered RD-33 engines. @TheImmortal



    [​IMG]
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 5
  14. TheImmortal

    TheImmortal SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,044
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2017
    Ratings:
    +1 / 3,436 / -11
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    You are assuming too much from a model. It could merely be a prop to demonstrate the Air Force.

    Furthermore, that design made sense somewhat about 10-15 Years ago. Today it would be a waste of resources to build given that by the time assembly and critical mass is hit it would be well into 2030’s. Taking a 4th gen design into that time period is not smart. Fighters are developed for 15-20 years of service.

    Better Iran focuses on developing a 5th/6th gen design even if it takes longer. Use foreign aircraft purchases as a stop gap and R&D for your eventual next gen domestic design.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  15. sahureka2

    sahureka2 FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    613
    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2016
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,761 / -0
    Country:
    Italy
    Location:
    Italy
    F-16 Introduction 17 August 1978 - 41 years in service and updated will fly to many air forces for many more years
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3