• Saturday, January 18, 2020

Iranian Missiles | News and Discussions

Discussion in 'Iranian Defence Forum' started by The SiLent crY, Jan 3, 2013.

  1. SOHEIL

    SOHEIL ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    15,608
    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2011
    Ratings:
    +11 / 35,140 / -17
    Country:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Location:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Hezbullah has big number of Fajr-5 guided version.

    And smaller number of Fateh-313 and Hormuz missiles !

    Presence of Anti ship BMs is not confirmed yet but they have enough number of Anti ship CMs ...

    BTW ... 13 years passed since 2006 !

    God ... We are getting old ...
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 9
  2. DoubleYouSee

    DoubleYouSee FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    327
    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2012
    Ratings:
    +0 / 643 / -0
    not older than me......
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  3. sha ah

    sha ah FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    157
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2018
    Ratings:
    +0 / 245 / -0
    Country:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Location:
    Canada
    Iran didn't go into Syria to threaten Israel. Syria asked for Iran's assistance in order to fight off a foreign backed insurgency. In any case, so far it has been the israelis that have been hitting Iranian assets and Iran has been patient, however if you look at the big picture, the israelis are digging themselves into a ditch. Everytime the zionists launch strikes onto Iraqi / Syrian territory, it helps Iran to prove its point to its followers and allies alike, legitimizing Iran's narrative that israel is indeed a threat. This in turn helps Iran rally more support behind its banner. At the end of the day, the israeli airstrikes, rather than forcefully dismounting Iran from Syria, have actually had the opposite effect, helping Iran entrench itself more firmly in Syria than ever before.

    Realistically Iran has the option of striking Israel from Syrian/Lebanese/Iraqi territory. On the other hand I highly doubt if the israelis would target Iran directly since that would completely change the dynamic of the conflict. So far Iran is trying to ignore the israeli airstrikes because despite israeli claims, the airstrikes have failed to prevent Iran from fulfilling it's mission in Syria and realistically have added up to being little more than a nuisance to Iran. However in the long run, if israel continues to pester Iranian proxies and target Iranian assets, eventually there will be retaliation and just like the Saudis, I can guarantee that when it happens, the israelis will cry foul, playing the victim role to a tee.

     
    Last edited: Nov 1, 2019
    • Thanks Thanks x 6
  4. Draco.IMF

    Draco.IMF FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,045
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2015
    Ratings:
    +0 / 2,317 / -0
    Country:
    Germany
    Location:
    Germany
    translated:

    The latest Islamic Republic of Iran cruise missile replica, named #Mobin, unveiled at the Russian Aerospace Exhibition (Max 2019), is specifically modeled on the American #scarab UAV that was also sold to Egypt.

    The weapon is capable of launching and flying

    [​IMG]
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 9
  5. Emad2000

    Emad2000 FULL MEMBER

    New Recruit

    Messages:
    28
    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2019
    Ratings:
    +0 / 215 / -0
    Country:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Location:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2019
    • Thanks Thanks x 6
  6. skyshadow

    skyshadow SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    3,217
    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2017
    Ratings:
    +2 / 8,218 / -0
    Country:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Location:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  7. DoubleYouSee

    DoubleYouSee FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    327
    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2012
    Ratings:
    +0 / 643 / -0
    Or maybe the year which it's unveiled(but not proclaimed officialy)......i red an news years before which sardar salami announced ;we have a missile can hit 3 targets simultaneusly......maybe 2001 is the year they tested the missile

    Regarding my last post,if i'm not mistaken its name was fajr-3 ballistic missile....
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  8. Emad2000

    Emad2000 FULL MEMBER

    New Recruit

    Messages:
    28
    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2019
    Ratings:
    +0 / 215 / -0
    Country:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Location:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Khorramshahr_Missile.jpg 806965_137.jpg 13980631000619637047550814896945_39476_PhotoT.jpg
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  9. Sineva

    Sineva FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,504
    Joined:
    May 24, 2018
    Ratings:
    +2 / 2,664 / -5
    Country:
    Australia
    Location:
    Korea, Democratic Peoples Republic Of
  10. TheImmortal

    TheImmortal SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,023
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2017
    Ratings:
    +1 / 3,414 / -11
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    Testing brings more international pressure and eyes on missile program.

    Hard for Iran to justify a missile with 4000KM range.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  11. Sineva

    Sineva FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,504
    Joined:
    May 24, 2018
    Ratings:
    +2 / 2,664 / -5
    Country:
    Australia
    Location:
    Korea, Democratic Peoples Republic Of
    4000KM!!....Ahhhh I dont think so,not unless you`re planning on having zero payload on the damn thing[LOL!].The dprk was struggling to even get 3500km out of it with a 500-1000kg nuclear warhead.I also remember iran stating that this would be used to carry heavyweight payloads out to medium range,not lightweight payloads out to intermediate.
    Frankly at this point theres little further pressure that the west can bring to bare and its not like they need any excuse to engage in economic blackmail and thuggery regardless of whatever iran does anyway.Irans ballistic missiles are neither a part of the jcpoa nor prohibited under any un resolution,plus they seem to be one of the few things outside of the nuclear program that supposedly worries the west,I think its past time that iran reminded them why this is.
    Ultimately sitting back and doing nothing while hoping that chump will go away and the eurovassals will grow some balls is just not a viable strategy......and never was.
    And lastly on a more practical note,larger payload capable missiles like this will likely be the future of irans deterrent force as they can not only carry more than one guided warhead they can also carry decoys and countermeasures against the existing and future abm systems in the region.After all what makes better sense from a perspective of military effectiveness,one warhead per missile from the existing force or multiple warheads plus penetration aids and decoys from a slightly larger missile?
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  12. AmirPatriot

    AmirPatriot SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    4,016
    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2015
    Ratings:
    +9 / 8,064 / -2
    Country:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Location:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    4000 km range would be useful in deterring Europe from participating in hostile US actions. The threat of even a small warhead (~500 kg) would have a large psychological impact if it's aimed at Warsaw or Berlin.

    Aside from bomber/logistics bases, you should also take into account the US developing INF-grade "Pershing III" that would likely be based in Poland or Romania.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  13. Sineva

    Sineva FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,504
    Joined:
    May 24, 2018
    Ratings:
    +2 / 2,664 / -5
    Country:
    Australia
    Location:
    Korea, Democratic Peoples Republic Of
    I agree,I think iran does need an intermediate ranged force as in the event of a us attack on iran a lot of the staging and logistics will be provided by europe,so having an ability to target these bases and other potentially non military infrastructure might give them pause.Unfortunately the khorramshahr just doesnt really have the range to do the job,ideally you`d need something like the kn17/hwasong 12 with its rd250 derived engines to cover most of europe from iran.
     
  14. yavar

    yavar SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    4,954
    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2013
    Ratings:
    +1 / 9,233 / -5



    Even Khorramshahr_1 has enough range, the second test it flow so high that it end up in UNSC never mind the Two stage one

     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2019
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  15. Battle of Waterloo

    Battle of Waterloo BANNED

    Messages:
    864
    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2019
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,595 / -1
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    3500km+ range is already possible with 500kg warhead - same warhead size as Shahab-3/Emad/Qadr (all have 500-700kg warheads AFAIK). But most importantly, don't forget new solid fuel engines tested in past few years...
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1