‘That’s what I said’.lol. Keep telling yourself that when research facilities, factories and scientists are routinely killed.
As @TheImmortal said, Revolutionary Iran and todays Iran are not the same. Such things would not stand back then.

‘That’s what I said’.lol. Keep telling yourself that when research facilities, factories and scientists are routinely killed.
As @TheImmortal said, Revolutionary Iran and todays Iran are not the same. Such things would not stand back then.
Pull up your pants Sparky. The water’s fine.Assassinations and attacks in Iran went from maybe 1-2 times a year. To now become monthly occurrences (maybe soon to be weekly?). We are told we should accept these.
And some members who for the life of them can never find a single fault with anything the IR of Iran ever does are again invoking a rendition of Baghdad Bob. They are smart members no doubt, but they have extreme blinded passion for government to the point of finding no fault in anything that happens.
“Accepting” Syrian strikes is one thing. But accepting ever increasingly assassinations and attacks on military bases inside our own country is completely another thing.
If Iran sent a drone to US soil, what do you think would happen?
If Iran blew up an Israeli military base in Jerusalem, what would happen?
Iran attacks Arab energy installations because they know the Arabs will never do anything! They will just cry to their masters.
Well apparently Israel views Iran the same way.
Iran attempted to establish a new redline with the Kurdistan missile attack by saying extrajudicial assassinations of IRGC members will no longer be tolerated. Well Israel just called the buff in the last 2 weeks.
Delusion people like you are the biggest danger to Iran. Ignoring problems because you don't like what it indicates.Pull up your pants Sparky. The water’s fine.
Delusion people like you are the biggest danger to Iran. Ignoring problems because you don't like what it indicates.
‘That’s what I said’.![]()
He said Ukraine war is a short war with very limited to no land gains for Russia.
I stated the opposite.
Iranians are tough and ‘مرد عمل. Learn from us and keep your tired whiny ways to yourself and present viable solutions. You rock like your Xbox couch mate Suzie although you seem to miss the fact you don’t need to share the same controller. Tag team anyone?Delusion people like you are the biggest danger to Iran. Ignoring problems because you don't like what it indicates.
The whino twins don’t fundamentally understand these. I’ve mentioned these exactly previously as well. They sound like their skinny jeans are a size or two too skinny.In fact, nothing fundamental has changed in Iran's posture and modus operandi.
Some people aren't well acquainted with the history of the 1980's, hence the off track moaning.
In the 1980's:
* A President of the Islamic Republic, shahid Rajai was assassinated.
* A Prime Minister of the Islamic Republic, shahid Bahonar, was assassinated.
* The headquarters of the main political formation, the Islamic Republic Party, were bombed resulting in the martyrdom of dozens including key figures of the Revolution and founding architects of the IR such as shahid Beheshti.
* There was an attempt on the life of another President, namely current Supreme Leader Khamenei (h.a.).
* Other leading personalities such as shahid Qoddusi were martyred in separate attacks.
* An Iranian civilian airliner was shot down by the US Navy, killing all on board.
* Several coup attempts were made including with the involvement of members of the armed forces. In one case, the judiciary found that there was a plan to dig a tunnel toward the humble residence of Imam Khomeini (r.a.) and martyr the latter.
* Infiltrators inside the system tried to sabotage Iranian policy (Mehdi Hashemi etc).
* Daily attacks, sabotage, killings by foreign-backed terrorist groups (MKO, separatists etc) for multiple years after the victory of the Revolution.
Did Iran follow a narrow tit for tat approach in retaliation? Negative. Did this absence of tit for tat cause defeat or lasting setbacks for Iran? Not at all, quite the opposite.
And the exact same is holding true nowadays. No difference whatsoever.
Those who try to contrast Iranian policy of the 1980's with today, and suggest Iran is now on the defensive are either inadequately informed, emotionally immature, or manipulators banking on readers' lack of historic knowledge to conduct psy-ops on the cheap.