• Thursday, August 13, 2020

Iranian Air Defense Systems

Discussion in 'Iranian Defence Forum' started by twilight, May 19, 2013.

  1. VEVAK

    VEVAK SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,216
    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2013
    Ratings:
    +1 / 3,048 / -0
    It's funny when faced with facts you either revert back to brining Iran in to a conversation about the F-35 or much like Trump you fall into a rather predictable narcissistic mentality of me, me, me, I know better than you......

    As for the Q-313 I wouldn't disagree that the project started out as a fraud however in a sense that it was a fraudulent attempt to steal money from Iran's military budget and NOT some absurd fake project meant for public consumption. If the Iranian government wanted to build a large mockup of a fighter they never intended to produce they would have done a far better job because if the goal was a fake project for public consumption they would have simply built a fake mockup of a supersonic fighter with fake slats and all with 2 larger jet engines (~the size of J79's or larger) and if the attempt was the Iranian governments attempt to fool the public they would have grabbed an F-5 HUD from storage they would have placed one larger screen in the middle with 2 MFD on either side all of which Iran has at it's disposal. Point is if it was a fake attempt by the Iranian government to fool the public they would have done far better job then that absurd design.

    And NO they haven't always been that way because back in the 80's & 90's most radars in the world depending on the country would have simply filtered out anything about the size of a bird since by the most part they lacked the processing power and software to be equipped with proper filters that could differentiate. And when you say short ranges it really depends on what you mean by short! And stealth or low rcs back then had far more value then it does today.

    As for F-14's and even Iranian built F-5's going up against the F-35's it really depends on what type of Radar and missile they have been upgraded with and in whos air space this fictional battle is to take place. However if your simply talking 1 on 1 with each aircrafts standard radar and missiles then of course the F-35 would not only win but could easily achieve a far greater than 10-1 kill ratio because it be pretty sad if the F-35 couldn't even match up against America's own 70's era technology. However equip each aircraft with the same sensors, weapons system and missiles and those advantages start to go away for that is the true test of a platforms capability and NOT it's ability to be equipped with more advanced sensors then America's own 70's era technology.

    As for knowing what an Aircrafts Max G means I'm pretty sure I've known that since high school which was decades ago! LOL! However It's becoming more clear to me that you obviously had to look that up after I schooled you....
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  2. gambit

    gambit PROFESSIONAL

    Messages:
    25,186
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2009
    Ratings:
    +146 / 22,871 / -8
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    The facts you presented are old and gone. A rehash of the discredited Pierre Sprey and Air Power Australia.

    As for Iran and/or her agents criticizing US...

    In military history, there are points where there is no return to the old ways. The bow and arrow, mobile armor, the machine gun, the airplane, etc. These are technology points. Then there are points where an army developed tactics that gave battlefield advantages for as long as it can exploit those tactics. The Roman phalanx is one example.

    The US military have done more than all -- in terms of technology -- create those non-returnable points. An army that has only single shot rifles cannot conceptualize what possible combat tactics that a machine gun can create. Same with airpower. A country that is landlocked cannot imagine what it is like to fight at sea.

    The Iranian Air Force is like that army with single shot rifles going up against the USAF with machine guns. Not only are you outgunned but also outnumbered and a long list of technology superiority that no amount of screaming 'Iran is not Iraq' can help. What I said you can call it narcissism if you like, but I call it as I see it -- reality. A cold bucket of cold reality to the face. With Desert Storm, I know what we can do in actual battles where people die. With two Red Flags, I know what we can do for the future. And that is a bleak future for any opposition air.

    What you said revealed your ignorance about radar detection in general, let alone of 'stealth'.

    The concept of the radar cross section (RCS) have been known since the invention of radar itself. An RCS is not a fixed value. It is called a 'fictitious' value. It is 'fictitious' not because we make it as we go along, but 'fictitious' in the sense that a body's RCS changes with distance. It does not matter if the body is shaped for 'stealth' or not. Close enough and the F-117 will be as large as a 747. And that is the point -- WHERE will the F-117 be as large as the 747?

    Simply put -- you do not know what you are talking about. And I say that kindly.

    :lol:

    I explained the 'g' in relation to airframe, avionics, flight control concepts, and the human body long before you got on this forum, pal. You 'schooled' me? But if that make you feel good about yourself, go right ahead. You have everything to prove while I -- none.
     
    Last edited: Nov 4, 2019
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  3. yavar

    yavar SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    5,123
    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2013
    Ratings:
    +1 / 9,621 / -5
    • Thanks Thanks x 8
  4. Draco.IMF

    Draco.IMF FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,121
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2015
    Ratings:
    +0 / 2,625 / -0
    Country:
    Germany
    Location:
    Germany
    launch of the system



    look how the mersad missile starts, its not going high but starts very low

    @yavar

    I remember some years ago in the old forum u mentioned this, there are 2 kinds of missile in development for mersad, one mersad missile is starting very low and one missile is going normally high

    The drone allegeldy flow very low, under 100m

    "Update The UAV has been shot down before reaching sensitive petrochemical facilities. When targeted the drone was flying on altitude < 100 meters."
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 6
  5. Battle of Waterloo

    Battle of Waterloo BANNED

    Messages:
    864
    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2019
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,599 / -1
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    They are assessing the wreckage apparently. Will be interesting to see if it came from Kuwait/KSA/ or over the Persian Gulf...
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  6. VEVAK

    VEVAK SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,216
    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2013
    Ratings:
    +1 / 3,048 / -0
    I never claimed RCS was a fixed value in fact you and me have had this discussion in the past and I quite clearly remember telling YOU that RCS is not fix value! LOL! Do you honestly not remember that?
    It still doesn't change the fact that in the 80's & 90's most radars being operated across various countries in the world filtered out anything showing up smaller than a bird and that allowed low RCS aircraft aka Stealth to fly a preplanned rout (F-117 had to use a computer to practically fly that rout for them) flying at the right angel towards the radar that allowed them to remain undetected (filtered) to a point where they could get close enough to release their missiles or glide bomb PGM's from 20km out and get out without ever getting locked on.

    HOWEVER those day's are LONG GONE! And I'm sticking to my original statement....


    As for Iran's Air Force let me make this very CLEAR! Iran is a country that hasn't purchased a single BVR equipped Air Superiority fighter in well over 4 decades and has made no real attempt to upgrade it's outdated fleet.
    Now do know why?
    Because Iran more than any other country on the planet knows that going up against the U.S. Air Force in the Air is a futile exercise and even if Iran was to equip it's self with a fleet of over 300 Su-30's tomorrow that fact WOULD NOT CHANGE and it would simply give the U.S. more targets to take down. And that's is why most of Iran's budget for weapons acquisition goes towards it's Missile program because by Iran's calculation the ONLY way Iran could possibly stand up to U.S. supremacy in the skies is by going after those fighters while they are on the ground using missiles
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  7. mohsen

    mohsen SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    5,407
    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2012
    Ratings:
    +1 / 11,800 / -2
    Country:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Location:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Damascus gave Iran advanced Israeli missile captured in Syria: Russian media


    BEIRUT, LEBANON (9:10 A.M.) – The Syrian military did not give Russia the advanced Israeli surface-to-air missile that landed inside Syria in July 2018, the Russian aviation publication Avia.Pro reported on Thursday.

    Instead, the Russian publication claims that Damascus transferred the Israeli missile to Iran, who, in turn, plans to reverse engineer the projectile.


    “As it turned out, the missile did not go to Moscow, but to Iran, which means serious problems for Israel against the backdrop of an escalation of the situation with the Islamic Republic,” Avia.Pro reported.

    “In fact, the missile did not go to Russia at all, but to Iran. <…> On this day, the Iranian cargo Il-76 was at Damascus International Airport, and could very well have delivered the Israeli missile defense system to Iran to study its capabilities,” they said, citing a military expert.

    “Russia’s interest in foreign military technology is quite obvious, but for Iran, this missile allows reveals features of the Israeli missile defense system. If Tehran really took possession of such a missile, then the reliability of Israeli air defense systems is in question, even if the missile defense has been seriously damaged,” they added.

    The news about Syria first capturing this Israeli missile and transferring it to the Russian military was first reported by the Chinese news service Sina.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 6
  8. skyshadow

    skyshadow SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    3,749
    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2017
    Ratings:
    +3 / 9,671 / -0
    Country:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Location:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Nov 9, 2019
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  9. VEVAK

    VEVAK SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,216
    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2013
    Ratings:
    +1 / 3,048 / -0
    Any news on what type of UAV it was that we shot down?
     
  10. zectech

    zectech SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,736
    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2018
    Ratings:
    +0 / 3,335 / -1
    Country:
    Italy
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Putin's role is to sell overpriced Russian second rate junk to Iran. Iran has refused to buy target practice equipment from Russia. Iraq had second rate Russian/Soviet junk in 1990 and was defeated. Air defense is vital for survival. SU-30s do not provide enough air superiority against F-22s and F-35s. Better to have ADS.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  11. VEVAK

    VEVAK SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,216
    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2013
    Ratings:
    +1 / 3,048 / -0
    Every country at the end of the day tries to do what is in their own self interest. The American's sell $100 Billion USD in junk to Arab states on a yearly bases so it's not surprising that others would wanna do the same and under normal conditions and in a relatively stable region a modernized Su-30 wouldn't necessarily be a bad platform to stock on however for Iran for as long as U.S. has this absurd obsession with Iran then the platform falls well short of being worth the cost.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  12. skyshadow

    skyshadow SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    3,749
    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2017
    Ratings:
    +3 / 9,671 / -0
    Country:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Location:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    no not yet
     
    Last edited: Nov 9, 2019
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  13. skyshadow

    skyshadow SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    3,749
    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2017
    Ratings:
    +3 / 9,671 / -0
    Country:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    Location:
    Iran, Islamic Republic Of
    now Iran giving a hint that it was Israeli drone took off from Bahrain


    Former Iranian diplomat AmirMousawi7 to Mayadeen reports preliminary indications are that the drone (shot down by Iranian air defences earlier) was an Israeli drone that took off from Bahrain. This is still unconfirmed.

    انهدام پهپاد متجاوز با سامانه‌‌ای که به هواپیمای «U2» اخطار داده بود


    این پهپاد که برای شناسایی مراکز حساس وارد مناطقی از جنوب کشور شده و با استفاده از ترفندهای پنهان‌کاری ازجمله پرواز در ارتفاع پست در حال ادامه مسیر به سمت اهداف مورد نظر بود، توسط سامانه پدافندی مرصاد شناسایی، رهگیری شد و مورد اصابت قرار گرفت.

    سامانه مرصاد پیش از این توانسته بود هواپیمای جاسوسی آمریکا موسوم به U2 را که از بالاترین سطح تکنولوژی بهره می برد، در ارتفاع 60 هزارپایی رهگیری کند و با اخطار آنرا از حریم هوایی کشور دور کند.



    [​IMG]


    https://defapress.ir/fa/news/369304...ا-سامانه‌‌ای-که-به-هواپیمای-u2-اخطار-داده-بود
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 5
  14. TheImmortal

    TheImmortal SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,538
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2017
    Ratings:
    +1 / 4,182 / -11
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    Calling a SU-30 “second rate junk” is the dumbest thing I have ever heard.

    SU-30 and it’s upgraded brother SU-35 form the backbone of the Russian air fleet.

    Iran could be only so lucky to have SU-30 in its fleet instead of the F-5 junk it keeps rehashing every 5 years under a new damn name.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  15. GWXP

    GWXP FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    418
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2019
    Ratings:
    +0 / 824 / -1
    Country:
    Russian Federation
    Location:
    Tajikistan
    A saying says: generals always prepare for the wars of the past.

    As F-35s enter service around the world and Chinese and Russian 5th generation fighters enter service----4th generation fighters like Su-30 have no future.

    So if Iran buys aircraft for its air force it will be either Su-57 or Chinese J-31, so these aircraft could serve in the air force until 2050.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2