What's new

Iran is learning from Russia’s use of missiles in Ukraine

WotTen

FULL MEMBER
Mar 18, 2022
1,006
-3
1,692
Country
Australia
Location
Australia
The USN doesn't deploy all twelve Carrier Battle Groups at once, this would be require massive resource/monetary spending as well as domestic political support for such an undertaking.

And no, a single American carrier group doesn't have enough firepower to outgun Iran (nuclear weapons shouldn't be factored in), Idk where you're getting this idea from. Iranian domestic weapons manufacturing has been exponentially producing powerful and numerous quantities of game-change PGM (precision guided munitions) for quite some time now. Thousands, upon thousands, upon thousands of difficult to counter BMs, and Drones are being produced and fielded by Iranian forces. This isn't something that can be simply dismissed just because America has a carrier battle-group in the vicinity. -- Both the range of IRGC AshCM, AshBMs, Drones (UVAC, loitering, suicide, reconnaissance), submarine/ surface-vessel launched weapons would be enough to see American NAVAL based sortie rates reduced since they would be forced to operate further away from Iranian soil.

Iranian offensive assets on Iranian-soil are well-defended in vast, well guarded (both passively and actively) mountain bases. Mobile launchers also play a great deal in ensuring that any efforts to attrite such assets (mobile TELS) will be greatly circumvented due to their ever moving nature.

I hope your confidence is well placed. I would certainly welcome anyone who can give Israel a bloody nose.
 

Blue In Green

FULL MEMBER
Nov 30, 2016
1,932
0
3,749
Country
United States
Location
United States
I hope your confidence is well placed. I would certainly welcome anyone who can give Israel a bloody nose.

It's not that Iran will "win" or come out on top without any doubt (any conflict will see massive amounts of destruction being inflicted upon Iran). Realistically all I'm saying is that the Iranian nation has vast/viable means to dish out insane amounts of destruction.

That's all really...
 

Blue In Green

FULL MEMBER
Nov 30, 2016
1,932
0
3,749
Country
United States
Location
United States
This strategy does not make sense. All of Iran's adversaries will have the US as an active party in the conflict. Iran does not have the ability to neutralize American retaliatory capability.

I also want to humbly add that the goal militarily shouldn't be centered around the neutralization of enemy retaliatory/offensive capacity but the means to defend ones own territory and the ability to strike back at some meaningful level.

Realistically you'll never be able to fully negate income fire, so it's best to adjust around potential losses during a conflict whilst also investing in the means to conduct offensive operations against enemy assets.
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom