one bomb for each one not one and they become as good as destroyed, and that is just some normal reinforced concrete , not even a modern oneWe should put them in hangers instead. I'm sure it'll be safe like these guys here
![]()
one bomb for each one not one and they become as good as destroyed, and that is just some normal reinforced concrete , not even a modern oneWe should put them in hangers instead. I'm sure it'll be safe like these guys here
![]()
amazing idea.. The sheer genius of Iranian military planners boggles the mind.Satellite image
View attachment 915509
1 bomb for each HAS is not a difficult task for USAF to achieve, you will lose dozens of aircraft for good in the first wave. Atleast with a fortified base, you can survive. Endurance and survivability is higher priority.one bomb for each one not one and they become as good as destroyed, and that is just some normal reinforced concrete , not even a modern one
Ukraine should learn from this as well. Not only protecting military assets but also important infrastructures like substations and power plants.1 bomb for each HAS is not a difficult task for USAF to achieve, you will lose dozens of aircraft for good in the first wave. Atleast with a fortified base, you can survive. Endurance and survivability is higher priority.
After the war they certainly will do what they can.Ukraine should learn from this as well. Not only protecting military assets but also important infrastructures like substations and power plants.
you can survive but you cant fight back .1 bomb for each HAS is not a difficult task for USAF to achieve, you will lose dozens of aircraft for good in the first wave. Atleast with a fortified base, you can survive. Endurance and survivability is higher priority.