• Saturday, October 20, 2018

INS Arihant Accident Raises Questions About the Sustainability of India's SSBN Force

Discussion in 'Central & South Asia' started by ashok321, Jan 13, 2018.

  1. ashok321

    ashok321 ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    17,951
    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2010
    Ratings:
    +5 / 9,979 / -2
    Country:
    Canada
    Location:
    Malaysia
    [​IMG]

    https://thediplomat.com/2018/01/ins...bout-the-sustainability-of-indias-ssbn-force/

    As news emerged of an accident that may have damaged INS Arihant, it’s worth considering just how difficult getting a sea-based nuclear deterrent off the ground (or under the sea) can be. India has embarked on the pursuit of an SSBN force much differently than any previous nuclear power, and even other navies have struggled to make it work.

    The idea of putting part of a nuclear deterrent on submarines emerged in the 1950s, as the United States and the USSR experimented with arming diesel-electric boats with rudimentary cruise and ballistic missiles. The value of nuclear propulsion was immediately obvious, as it allowed subs to remain on patrol for long periods of time.

    The U.S. Navy was remarkably successful in getting its sea-based nuclear deterrent under way. After experiments with diesel subs, the USN ordered construction of the George Washington class SSBN, a five boat group based on the Skipjack class SSNs. The first George Washington, carrying 16 Polaris SLBMs, entered service in 1959 and remained active until the 1980s. Later USN SSBNs built on the same successful template.

    The British experience was similar to the American; the four Resolution class SSBNs (based on the ValiantSSNs) were ordered in 1963, and entered service between 1967 and 1969. Carrying 16 Polaris missiles, these subs remained in service until the 1990s. France’s program was somewhat slower; five boats of the Redoutableclass were built between 1963 and 1980, each carrying 16 MSBS missiles, with the first boat entering service in 1971. Unlike Britain and the United States, France attempted to embark on the construction of SSBNs before establishing an SSN template.

    For the Russians and the Chinese, things went harder. The eight Project 658 boats (NATO designation Hotel), the first Soviet SSBNs, began entering service in 1960, following experimentation with various diesel-electrics. A rough combination of the November class SSNs and the Golf class SSBs, the Hotels carried three short-range SLBMs and were not generally competitive with the George Washington class. These early boats did not offer much of a credible deterrent, given their noise and the fact that they needed to deploy close to the U.S. coast. The first serious SSBNs, the Project 667 boats, began to enter service in 1967. The Soviets lost one SSBN in service and suffered problems with several others.

    China laid down its first SSBN in 1978, having developed experience with a former Soviet Golf class boat and with the Han class SSNs. Completed in 1981, the Type 092 submarine has drifted in and out of service for the past 30 years, but reportedly has never conducted a patrol outside Chinese waters. A second submarine of the type was rumored lost in 1985, but this has never been confirmed.

    In retrospect, the George Washington class SSBNs were a fabulous engineering success, entering service quickly, with few problems, and packing a huge punch. All of the NATO boats were relatively quiet and could threaten the USSR from long-range. On the other hand, it took the USSR nearly a decade to produce a meaningful deterrent boat. It has taken China nearly three decades, despite extensive experience in both countries in submarine construction and operation.

    This stuff is hard. The Indian experience has been particularly difficult because India has never constructed a nuclear submarine before, has never operated an SSB, and has very limited experience with nuclear attack subs. As Ankit Panda points out, the Indian submarine force has experienced other maintenance and performance issues. It is not surprising that problems have dogged INS Arihant, and it brings up questions about how much India should invest in a sea-based deterrent.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  2. shootingstar

    shootingstar BANNED

    Messages:
    930
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2017
    Ratings:
    +0 / 315 / -0
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    Canada
    What can you expect under Modi?
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  3. war&peace

    war&peace ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    22,646
    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2015
    Ratings:
    +12 / 38,142 / -12
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Sweden
    What has Modi to do with it. BTW he is better than the rest.
     
  4. shootingstar

    shootingstar BANNED

    Messages:
    930
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2017
    Ratings:
    +0 / 315 / -0
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    Canada
    He may be better for Pakistan, Best for the West but worst for India.

    No wonder Pakistanis love him.
     
  5. war&peace

    war&peace ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    22,646
    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2015
    Ratings:
    +12 / 38,142 / -12
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Sweden
    Majority of Indians like him
     
  6. shootingstar

    shootingstar BANNED

    Messages:
    930
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2017
    Ratings:
    +0 / 315 / -0
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    Canada
  7. Skull and Bones

    Skull and Bones ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    14,530
    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Ratings:
    +7 / 26,214 / -9
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    United States
    Again, what has Modi has to do with this?
     
  8. shootingstar

    shootingstar BANNED

    Messages:
    930
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2017
    Ratings:
    +0 / 315 / -0
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    Canada
    He is the PM of India. The buck stops at his desk.
     
  9. Skull and Bones

    Skull and Bones ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    14,530
    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Ratings:
    +7 / 26,214 / -9
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    United States
    So he makes the maintenance and training protocols for the navy?
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  10. shootingstar

    shootingstar BANNED

    Messages:
    930
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2017
    Ratings:
    +0 / 315 / -0
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    Canada
    What idiotic argument is that? Suresh Prabhu was fired because of train accidents. Was he driving the trains?

    What upgrades did feku manage in the last 3.5 years? None

    Modi even failed at basic stuff even if we discount the big ticket items.

    Soldiers don't have proper food to eat, dying due to lack of bullet proof jackets and don't have proper snipers/machine guns to shoot back.
     
Similar Threads
  1. Levina
    Replies:
    33
    Views:
    3,670
Loading...