• Tuesday, September 25, 2018

Indirect admission by US generals on support to Rouge groups in syria

Discussion in 'Turkish Defence Forum' started by AZADPAKISTAN2009, Jan 25, 2017.

  1. AZADPAKISTAN2009

    AZADPAKISTAN2009 ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    25,713
    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Ratings:
    +33 / 23,415 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    China
    Pretext of the discussion:
    US government Official is questioning the logic of anti Assad forces (Weapon's supply) , that also include group which Turkey may consider anti Turkey (Inadvertidly mentions "KURDS" at 2:15)

    Knowing very well that once Russia/ Turkey / Syria / Iran will take a stance there is no strategy
    Quite an interesting eye opener

    I was shocked
    An actual debate/questioning of logic behind supporting the initiative with no planning



    Thoughts by Turkish members/ Russians or Iranains

    Mr Graham a very logical articulate man in his thinking and makes sense what he say why incite a war when you have no planning to the big sh*it that will fall after, the worry and passion in tha Senator is quite real , and justifiable

    I would certainly like to see view point from Pro Erodgan vs None Pro Erodgan members

    Similarly would be nice to see some views from Iranians and Russian

    • I think if you take a step back and then view the whole Syrian conflict in last 2-3 years really makes one think , just to topple Assad one man's government

    Similarly would be intersting to hear from feedback from arab members , their argument has always been , well Russia the bad wolf but looks like its is not the Russians arming the rouges
    And even Iran does not appear to be the main issue here - Thoughts Is the conflict still viewed as a Sactarian issue ?

    Should Syria demand $$$ for the damages to its country in International Court ?
     
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2017
  2. randomradio

    randomradio SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    5,575
    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2016
    Ratings:
    +8 / 3,905 / -18
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    The minute Russia walked into Syria, it became a no-go zone for the Americans.

    Plus the rebels the US is supporting are fighting on multiple fronts, much more than Assad. So they are stuck fighting ISIL more than Assad. That's why Assad was able to focus on Aleppo.
     
  3. WaLeEdK2

    WaLeEdK2 SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    4,974
    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2014
    Ratings:
    +7 / 6,419 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Canada
    [​IMG]
     
  4. Saithan

    Saithan SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,026
    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2010
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,380 / -0
    I would have chosen to say "The minute US stood there and watched Russia waltz into Syria" it became a no go.

    And RTE retorik against Assad (with spit and foam coming out of his mouth like a zealot) didn't help our standing in the ME much.

    I am thinking that RTE was so sure that the west would go into Syria with arms, soldiers etc. that he jumped in front of the line to "lead" by example and look at where it brought us.

    A Euraphrate Shield plan they're implementing without support only beneficial for the western world.

    They could have just let ppl go through Turkey and we'd not have the same amount of problems. it'd be Europes problem.
     
  5. Timur

    Timur SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,693
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2014
    Ratings:
    +0 / 2,348 / -0
    Country:
    Turkey
    Location:
    Germany
    o_O

    no not unplanned.. its with full knowledge and full purpose..

    hey its not a war on terrorism its a war on islam.. even the name terrorism is selected to denounce islam and to let the stupids not see it..

    russia, US, EU everything is the same coin but different perspectives/sides..