What's new

India's Vikrant vs China's Fujian: Why Made-in-India aircraft carrier outshines Beijing's warship

vishwambhar

SENIOR MEMBER
Jan 22, 2020
2,106
-19
1,825
Country
India
Location
India
Chinese AC is superior but for India Vikrant will give her enough fire power required in IOR and nearby water ways..... even if Vikrant has to face Fujian in these areas then too she will have adequate fire power, supply chain and weapons support from other war ships and land based systems EG. Flanker Tanjavur based squadron equipped with Brahmos.... so if Vikrant has to face Fujian in IOR or Malacca then Fujian is not a major problem
 

nahtanbob

ELITE MEMBER
Sep 24, 2018
10,484
-55
3,548
Country
United States
Location
United States
This is like saying a J-8 is better than a F-22.

“The F-119 engines on the F-22 are capable of massive thrust and thrust vectoring, but experts say that they are very expensive to operate and maintain, use lots of fuel, and could contribute to aircraft crash if there is slight fault with FBW. Turbojet engines for the J-8 are a lot cheaper and perform well at high altitude.”

See what I did there?

What do you think PAF is capable of acquiring ? J-8 or F-22
 

Super Falcon

ELITE MEMBER
Jul 3, 2008
15,451
-9
6,182
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Arab Emirates
Vikrant simply of no match to Chinese fujan for simple reason stobar carrier has big limitations against catobar

Catobar aircraft can launch heave fixed wing aircraft like Awacs type E2D Hawkeye and can handle wide variety of fighter jets in numbers Stobar is better than just nothing but worst than catobar but again in Arabian sea for power projection India is in power with such carrier no one challenging indian navy here with similar aircraft

 

Beast

ELITE MEMBER
Feb 5, 2011
30,239
-51
66,876
Country
China
Location
China
Stop getting uppity, its been 60 years since the first moon landing and you chinese are nowhere near landing a man on the moon, yet you compare yourself to the US 🤣
Stop face saving. And indian want to claim Indian space is better than Chinese? China build a own space station and US despite bragging landed on moon 50 years ago , can't even build a space station themselves and need Russia help. Now they are separating. US permanent presence in space is doomed. There is no denying China space can be on par with US.
 

Baba_Yaga

BANNED
Mar 1, 2020
1,002
-18
1,095
Country
India
Location
Canada
Stop face saving. And indian want to claim Indian space is better than Chinese? China build a own space station and US despite bragging landed on moon 50 years ago , can't even build a space station themselves and need Russia help. Now they are separating. US permanent presence in space is doomed. There is no denying China space can be on par with US.

US only needs Russian help to launch payloads. You CCP bots only read what fits your narrow agenda. Read about why US uses Russis to launch payload. Just because US companies manufacture underwear or laptops in China doesnt mean US cant manufacture underwear or laptops. Similarly, US has outsourced launching payloads to Russian rockets because it was cheaper, not because they dont have the tech. Nasa spent all its money over the decades on the space shuttle program, something that is light years ahead of anything China has, and thus they neglected to produce cheap efficient rockets to launch payloads. Now Spacex and several other of their private companies are doing that for them.
 

Beast

ELITE MEMBER
Feb 5, 2011
30,239
-51
66,876
Country
China
Location
China
US only needs Russian help to launch payloads. You CCP bots only read what fits your narrow agenda. Read about why US uses Russis to launch payload. Just because US companies manufacture underwear or laptops in China doesnt mean US cant manufacture underwear or laptops. Similarly, US has outsourced launching payloads to Russian rockets because it was cheaper, not because they dont have the tech. Nasa spent all its money over the decades on the space shuttle program, something that is light years ahead of anything China has, and thus they neglected to produce cheap efficient rockets to launch payloads. Now Spacex and several other of their private companies are doing that for them.
Delusion at its best. You can bark 100 times but it can't change any fact. :enjoy:


The core module belongs to Russia. Russia has the right to remove it. ISS can't work without core module.


And the US Mars mission is depending on Russian engine all the while. While Chinese all mission are using Chinese engine. None imported. :enjoy:
 

Baba_Yaga

BANNED
Mar 1, 2020
1,002
-18
1,095
Country
India
Location
Canada
What a dumb argument

Its like saying nobody has build stone Pyramids for hundreds of years, so therefore the entire world is behind in construction tech.
Not really and a pretty bad analogy, they might not have built pyramids, but they have built tower, bridges etc and way more complex than the pyramids, which shows they can easily build the pyramids. China on the other hand has done nothing more complex than the moon landing, which remains the single biggest technological feat man has ever accomplished, and its been 60 years since then.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom