What's new

India's N-sub undermines strategic stability: Pak

TOPGUN

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
Jun 6, 2006
8,316
1
7,661
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Its a diplomatic game that your nation yet has to master......

Live in your ego.....and you lose....

Remember, when we need to, we flex our muscles.... but that's because we have that leverage......
Crying is not flexing muscles ! second crying is not a practice for grown up's to practice get it right! and learn these words u might need it in the world boy ! to get something in this world u must work hard for it ... furthermore, we don't need to master nothing for a country that is less 3 times your countires size and in armed forces as well i think we hold a pretty good ground with giving your countries gov sleepless nights!:woot: anyhow iam not here to argue all iam saying is crying is getting old and a time will come very soon when it wont work anymore so trying mastering something else perhaps peace not crying ..:pakistan:
 
Last edited:

TOPGUN

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
Jun 6, 2006
8,316
1
7,661
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Well, its not just crying. It's a kind of creating negative opinion in the global arena.

It hurts the image of the targetted country.

And yes, we complain only when harpons are modified or nuclear proliferation occurs or when islamic terrorism is used as a state policy.

We will not complain if you build an indigenous nuclear sub.
Creative plzz tell me you are not a little boy ! there is nothing creative about it .. you country has harldy done any damage as of so far since years of trying they got no where lol . Furthermore, targetting and hurting Pakistan? you need to watch your words wisely ..:hang2: your country is big cry baby :cry: and always has been and its getting played out soon the time will come when the world will see this not for long your countries childesh tears will vanash lol :azn:
 

X11

BANNED

New Recruit

Sep 24, 2009
51
0
26
Well, till date, India has better global image than pakistan.

The NSG approval of Indo-US nuclear deal is a proof of it.

I understand, truth is hard to belive.
 

bigmoneymaker

FULL MEMBER
Jul 6, 2009
434
0
163
indians are so despicxxxx!!! when facing pakistan they weilded their big sticks threatening the people to submit to him, and by this way india subdued the surrounding immediate weak neighbours to make him the unchallengeable big brother!!!
But when facing china, it pretended to be the innocent victim to draw international sympathy to gain aids and assistance to contain china. such weaklixx.. if you dont want to confront with china, then dont make any aggressive stance to your neighbours or someday you shall get your retribution. the one oppresses others may get oppressed by stronger one eventually..stop this vicious cycle of hatred, if you truly has the will to abandon the hegemonic mindset !!! just a piece of sincere advice.
 

bones20

BANNED
Aug 25, 2009
156
0
31
indians are so despicxxxx!!! when facing pakistan they weilded their big sticks threatening the people to submit to him,

All the 3 wars between India and Pakistan have been inaugurated by Pakistan without any provocation.

and by this way india subdued the surrounding immediate weak neighbours to make him the unchallengeable big brother!!!

Who? How? When? From what I am seeing, its the neighbors who have been barking the elephant - be it Pak (with terrorism) or Bangladesh (with infiltration)

But when facing china, it pretended to be the innocent victim to draw international sympathy to gain aids and assistance to contain china.

what aids? we are a donor nation to IMF

such weaklixx.. if you dont want to confront with china, then dont make any aggressive stance to your neighbours or someday you shall get your retribution. the one oppresses others may get oppressed by stronger one eventually..stop this vicious cycle of hatred,

Where is the terrorism (jihad) emanating from? So where is the hatred?

if you truly has the will to abandon the hegemonic mindset !!! just a piece of sincere advice.

What hegemony? Geopolitics is all about strategic interests and not some charity.
...........
 

Yang

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Sep 30, 2009
25
0
14
All the 3 wars between India and Pakistan have been inaugurated by Pakistan without any provocation??:rofl::rofl: The weak Pakistan attacked the strong India,Why?If it's true,it will also be ture that the weak india attacked the strong china in 1962.Why?Put your answer to the first question here,change china into USA or Soviet Union,change pakistan into india,change india into china...
 

bigmoneymaker

FULL MEMBER
Jul 6, 2009
434
0
163
firstly, the aids may include the tot by another advanced country when you are still unable to probe or reverse engineering. rewards of tech and political support.

secondly, geopolitic is a mere concept introduced by the west to create distrust between traditional neighbouring countries in asia..dont you see eu are united to play at the victims believing this?
 

bigmoneymaker

FULL MEMBER
Jul 6, 2009
434
0
163
just recently after i surfed the forums so i discovered that indians are so despicxxxx!!! when facing pakistan they weilded their big sticks threatening the people to submit to him, and by this way india subdued the surrounding immediate weak neighbours to make him the unchallengeable big brother!!!
But when facing china, it pretended to be the innocent victim to draw international sympathy to gain aids and assistance to contain china. such weaklixx.. if you dont want to confront with china, then dont make any aggressive stance to your neighbours or someday you shall get your retribution. the one oppresses others may get oppressed by stronger one eventually..stop this vicious cycle of hatred, if you truly has the will to abandon the hegemonic mindset !!! just a piece of sincere advice.
firstly, the aids may include the tot by another advanced country when you are still unable to probe or reverse engineering. rewards of tech and political support.

secondly, geopolitic is a mere concept introduced by the west to create distrust between traditional neighbouring countries in asia..dont you see eu are united to play at the victims believing this?
thirdly, will you believe a smaller and weaker country will become more aggressive than the bigger ones?? even if the smaller ones may have gained the support from one superpower? or the propaganda by your free media of making yourselves innocent prevailing in your minds??
 

Chanakyaa

SENIOR MEMBER
Jan 17, 2009
6,497
-36
10,750
Country
India
Location
India
ndia comprises the size of all 48 EU nations......about 48 countries
india's population is 1.3 times europe's population.

one nuclaer submarine is much less i think....to protect indian race........

probably it needs to ramp from 01 submarine to a fleet of 20 submarine within a decade........

pakistan should learn this...
Its for Offence rather Defence.
India or Pakistan or eben China will go for Nuclear Weapons in ONLY one condition.
Hoping that the First Strike will wipe out a Complete potential of the opponent to restrike. Otherwise it doesent make any sense for just 20-30 strikes are enough to devastate any of the 3 nations.

Now, I agree that Nuclear Sumarine Existance will make PAK think twice before striking as it can be rarely detected so the trigger for India will mean a reciprocal for pakistan, without any defence.
So Yes, It does disturb the stratagic balance between The two.

But, what Pak is ignoring is, For India China is a greater Concern, They have a vast fleet of Nuclear Missiles, so if Stratagic Balance is Important for Pak, so is it for India in referance to China.

I personally dont think, pak needs a nuclear sub, as india wont attack First, and if It Does, pak is having more than enough nuclear power to reply evenin the absense of a Nuclear Sub.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom