What's new

INDIA’S MARITIME CLAIMS Bangladesh files protests at UN

Michael Corleone

ELITE MEMBER
Oct 27, 2014
10,201
-5
10,538
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Ukraine
What I see is the long history of BSF shooting illegal border crossers and sometimes upsetting BD due to it. But I also see BD helping to root out anti-Indian militants on BD soil.
Perhaps you haven’t seen truck loads of BSF dead bodies from bd. Or BSF in shorts shot dead in his boat.
 

Sainthood 101

FULL MEMBER
Jul 24, 2021
2,066
-3
2,124
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Bhutanese are firmly anti-Indian in posture, just like Nepalese. Indians know this as I have seen this mentioned in several Indian policy documents.


Listen to this Hindutva whisperer, as if Bangladesh would have been in our current position today, being a part of India. :lol:

Chanakya North Indian Hindutva cow-belters would suck us dry (just like they are trying now at 50%, but at 100%), and just like they have completely exploited Assam (petroleum), West Bengal and are trying to exploit Southern States too (but can't). Thank Allah we are a sovereign nation not beholden to Indian mismanagement and garbage policies. At least we can decide on our own future and growth trajectory and easily best India's records, which we already have.

East Bengal was always a prosperous part of India (due to agricultural assets and hard work) and produced the majority of GDP even for Mughal India - starting in 1300 AD. It is only due to other entities like West Bengal baboos under the British exploiting us that we temporarily fell on hard times. Kolkata wasn't even anywhere on the map before the British arrived.
I know even Pakistanis talk shit about the poor guy without realizing he was from Rawalpindi region...

y'all probably look at it as the same thing but this region also disliked Hindustan/UP and its hard handed tactics to control the people, that's why they joined invasions to take revenge from Hindustanis and was generally a hard to control region

I feel Hindustanis got him in the first place because he was a native to that land and in order to understand the frontier, they needed to get the local on board to understand the frontier and somehow bring em to heel

of course it didn't work as the region went from Buddhist, Hindu now Muslim and is still a issue to Hindustanis and they (anyone who controlled Delhi- including Muslims) have tried everything from literally killing entire villages and in return this region made up with Afghanis and joined them in invasions (fought hard when they raided, beat em up and took KP, but when they had plans of invasions, they joined in (including the Sikhs, Hindus, Muslims))

I don't know what's the issue of Hindustanis and what rubs other people of SC the wrong way?
like Hindustani people should analyze it? what's the deeper issue here
 

Bilal9

ELITE MEMBER
Feb 4, 2014
18,220
1
28,825
Country
Bangladesh
Location
United States
I know even Pakistanis talk shit about the poor guy without realizing he was from Rawalpindi region...

y'all probably look at it as the same thing but this region also disliked Hindustan/UP and its hard handed tactics to control the people, that's why they joined invasions to take revenge from Hindustanis and was generally a hard to control region

I feel Hindustanis got him in the first place because he was a native to that land and in order to understand the frontier, they needed to get the local on board to understand the frontier and somehow bring em to heel

of course it didn't work as the region went from Buddhist, Hindu now Muslim and is still a issue to Hindustanis and they (anyone who controlled Delhi- including Muslims) have tried everything from literally killing entire villages and in return this region made up with Afghanis and joined them in invasions (fought hard when they raided, beat em up and took KP, but when they had plans of invasions, they joined in (including the Sikhs, Hindus, Muslims))

I don't know what's the issue of Hindustanis and what rubs other people of SC the wrong way?
like Hindustani people should analyze it? what's the deeper issue here
Hindustanis historically have laid claims over all of India (as they believe the rest of former India including Bangladesh has less clueful people) without realizing that their claims over the rest of former India does not hold water.

Hindustanis want ideally for Bangladesh to become a subservient buffer state and a convenient market, a situation which we have patiently tolerated for five decades now.

If Bangladesh becomes too strong, Hindustanis mistakenly believe that would become a problem for Hindustan cow-belt proper geopolitically, which could not be farther from the truth.

No one in Bangladesh really cares about Hindustan or its inhabitants because for eons, they have been an indisciplined, hard-to-manage group of people, used to living in filth. As long as Hindustanis keep to themselves, we don't really care.

Bangladeshis simply do not want anyone (including Hindustanis) to exploit us, including our own leaders who are Hindustani agents. They exceed their limits and they will be overthrown, as simple as that.
That was one incident 20 years ago during Khaleda Zia's hostile anti-Indian govt.
No, some incidents are within the last five years, obviously you don't keep up.

Hasina does not hold arms and patrols the border herself...
 

Bilal9

ELITE MEMBER
Feb 4, 2014
18,220
1
28,825
Country
Bangladesh
Location
United States
The dadas got lucky with Kolkata..

Without that city, WB would be nowhere today.


Apart from Kolkata, rest of WB is a dump, poor place is being sucked dry to please marwaris..


I don't understand how our brethren can take such insult sitting down (tamed ?).. I couldn't, If it came to Dhaka and If it was Chittagong, I'd be furious.


Bengal is for Bengalis, not those who mock our culture and language (cow belt types and especially Biharis) but then run their households with Bengali money.
West Bengali effeminate dadas basically lack backbones now, they have been programmed by Marwari/Hindustani sweet-talk to accept their second class status in their own state.

Dadas are happy being second class Hindustani citizens and they exclusively speak Hindi or English nowadays. Recent X and Y-gen Kolkata kids hardly know how to write Bengali even.

In their own states Marwari Back-office tech companies come in and put out job notices mentioning in clear language that local Kolkata people are not welcome to apply (as Marwari/Hindustani impressions are that Kolkata Dadas are lazy).

Can you believe this $hit??

Wow - just wow!

What level of backbone (rather, lack of it) can you have to tolerate this level of personal and ethnic degradation in your own state by low-life cow-belters from poorer states like Bihar?

Dadas have no shame....soon that state will be owned by BJP and will accommodate all of Bihar for jobs as Bihar is an effed up state itself and worse than WB.
 
Last edited:

DalalErMaNodi

BANNED
May 12, 2020
5,296
6
8,715
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Kuwait
West Bengali effeminate dadas basically lack backbones now, they have been programmed by Marwari/Hindustani sweet-talk to accept their second class status in their own state.

Dadas are happy being second class Hindustani citizens and they exclusively speak Hindi or English nowadays. Recent X and Y-gen Kolkata kids hardly know how to write Bengali even.

In their own states Marwari Back-office tech companies come in and put out job notices mentioning in clear language that local Kolkata people are not welcome to apply (as Marwari/Hindustani impressions are that Kolkata Dadas are lazy).

Can you believe this $hit??

Wow - just wow!

What level of backbone (rather, lack of it) can you have to tolerate this level of personal and ethnic degradation in your own state by low-life cow-belters from poorer states like Bihar?

Dadas have no shame....soon that state will be owned by BJP and will accommodate all of Bihar for jobs as Bihar is an effed up state itself and worse than WB.

It's a shame.. mistakes were made in the past by both sides undoubtedly but what the upper caste and influential Hindus of WB did is unforgivable..


For personal gains they split Bengal.. just to keep their lands and lord over lower caste Hindus unabated and unreformed.



Separation to save Hinduism they said.
Separation to prevent takeover Pakistan, they said.


All for what ? Total cultural Genocide at the hands of cow belters..


Darned shame.. I worry what happens once the older generation of Bengalis in WB dies out.. complete takeover comes to mind.


Rip Western Bengal.



Many dadas think it's natural for these things to happen.. how is it natural to replace Bengali culture and norms with Hindustani ones ?

Do south Indians capitulate ? No, they don't. I don't understand why our malda dadas gave up so easily and accepted belter hegemony.
 

magra

BANNED
Aug 17, 2020
1,977
-4
904
Country
India
Location
United States
It's a shame.. mistakes were made in the past by both sides undoubtedly but what the upper caste and influential Hindus of WB did is unforgivable..

For personal gains they split Bengal.. just to keep their lands and lord over lower caste Hindus unabated and unreformed.

Separation to save Hinduism they said.
Separation to prevent takeover Pakistan, they said.

All for what ? Total cultural Genocide at the hands of cow belters..

Darned shame.. I worry what happens once the older generation of Bengalis in WB dies out.. complete takeover comes to mind.

Rip Western Bengal.

Many dadas think it's natural for these things to happen.. how is it natural to replace Bengali culture and norms with Hindustani ones ?

Do south Indians capitulate ? No, they don't. I don't understand why our malda dadas gave up so easily and accepted belter hegemony.
Bengal was initially divided along religious lines by British in 1905. After lot of protests, they were forced to reverse the decision after a few years.
In 1947, Muslim League wanted a new nation based on religious lines. If thats the case, then why are you crying over not having West Bengal.
 

DalalErMaNodi

BANNED
May 12, 2020
5,296
6
8,715
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Kuwait
Bengal was initially divided along religious lines by British in 1905. After lot of protests, they were forced to reverse the decision after a few years.
In 1947, Muslim League wanted a new nation based on religious lines. If thats the case, then why are you crying over not having West Bengal.


lol... Muslim League wanted United Bengal under H.S Suhrawardy.. Hindu mahasaba rejected the proposal due to their inherent dislike of Muslims who they saw as dalits.


Go read up history.. the British, Jinnah and Gandhi were all on board.
 

magra

BANNED
Aug 17, 2020
1,977
-4
904
Country
India
Location
United States
lol... Muslim League wanted United Bengal under H.S Suhrawardy.. Hindu mahasaba rejected the proposal due to their inherent dislike of Muslims who they saw as dalits.


Go read up history.. the British, Jinnah and Gandhi were all on board.
Gandhi wanted a united India. Are you saying he was OK with partition of India and giving away entire Bengal state to Pakistan? Any proof of that?
 

DalalErMaNodi

BANNED
May 12, 2020
5,296
6
8,715
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Kuwait
Gandhi wanted a united India. Are you saying he was OK with partition of India and giving away entire Bengal state to Pakistan? Any proof of that?

Yes. That's what I'm saying.. he agrees to the idea in Principle, so long as the Hindus of Bengal were okay with it.



The upper caste Hindus of West Bengal are to blame for WB being in perpetual doldrums..


Bengali culture is systematically being erased from India because it is one of tolerance.. Which is why communalism doesn't work in WB.


But Cow belters and Gujaratis are trying very hard to change that.




And some spineless malda dadas are letting it happen, what a shame.. sold their soul to the devil.



Then again.. it was always us Easterners who paid the price when push came to shove for defending Bengal.. so why I am surprised.
 

magra

BANNED
Aug 17, 2020
1,977
-4
904
Country
India
Location
United States
Yes. That's what I'm saying.. he agrees to the idea in Principle, so long as the Hindus of Bengal were okay with it.
So now you add a rider that he was conditionally ok as long as Hindus were.

You wanted a separate nation with Muslim majority. Then why should you expect Hindus (West Bengal) to be in a nation where they are in minority. Is it not hypocrisy?
But Cow belters and Gujaratis are trying very hard to change that.
Marwaris and Gujaratis are typically business minded people. Kolkata was the capital of British India till 1912, hence a lot of business community (Marwari / Gujarati) settled in Kolkata.
State language of WB is still Bengali and will remain so. It has a thriving Bengali speaking cinema. What culture change are you talking about?
Obviously being part of India, there will be some assimilation. No one is forcing them to assimilate.
 

DalalErMaNodi

BANNED
May 12, 2020
5,296
6
8,715
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Kuwait
So now you add a rider that he was conditionally ok as long as Hindus were.

You wanted a separate nation with Muslim majority. Then why should you expect Hindus (West Bengal) to be in a nation where they are in minority. Is it not hypocrisy?

Marwaris and Gujaratis are typically business minded people. Kolkata was the capital of British India till 1912, hence a lot of business community (Marwari / Gujarati) settled in Kolkata.
State language of WB is still Bengali and will remain so. It has a thriving Bengali speaking cinema. What culture change are you talking about?
Obviously being part of India, there will be some assimilation. No one is forcing them to assimilate.
No, the plan was to include certain districts of Bihar and Assam in United Bengal to 'fix' the religious majority/minority issue..


The plan was not foolproof but people tried.. the brahmin landowners shot it down.. by extension they shot themselves in the foot.


Now they're paying due penance, shame is regular WB folk have to suffer at hands of marwaris.




We in the east first protested for our language rights in then Pakistan in '52.. many of our people were killed.. we never let them force a foreign culture and language and way of life onto us.


Then again in '71 and the events that led to it starting in '69, we once again fought for our language..


This is how you defend your culture from outside influence.. not by assimilating into Indian culture (which is a fancy way of say North and Central Indian culture)..




We did all this for Bangla and Bengalis.. while dadas sat and let marwaris overrun them.


And we were supposed to be the ones who sold our soul to the West Pakistanis..



Oh how fates change and tables turn.
 

magra

BANNED
Aug 17, 2020
1,977
-4
904
Country
India
Location
United States
No, the plan was to include certain districts of Bihar and Assam in United Bengal to 'fix' the religious majority/minority issue..
You mean that including those parts would have made proportion of Hindus and Muslims as 50-50 ? Was West Pakistani leadership on-board this idea of being a Muslim-Hindu 50/50 country?
And if Pakistan was so comfortable with having Hindus, then why did they forcibly drive away millions of Hindus / Sikhs from West Pak?

Now they're paying due penance, shame is regular WB folk have to suffer at hands of marwaris.
Whats making you say that WB folk are suffering due to being part of India. I see more BD ppl coming to WB for shopping, treatment etc than the other way round.

We in the east first protested for our language rights in then Pakistan in '52.. many of our people were killed.. we never let them force a foreign culture and language and way of life onto us.

Then again in '71 and the events that led to it starting in '69, we once again fought for our language..

This is how you defend your culture from outside influence.. not by assimilating into Indian culture (which is a fancy way of say North and Central Indian culture)..
WB has Bengali as their state language. No one is taking that away. No one is taking away their culture either. So what are you crying about?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom