• Monday, August 19, 2019

India's foreign policy for next 5 years: Expanding bilateral ties with Bangladesh vital for New Delh

Discussion in 'Bangladesh Defence Forum' started by Homo Sapiens, Jun 12, 2019.

  1. Homo Sapiens

    Homo Sapiens SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    7,481
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2015
    Ratings:
    +3 / 16,776 / -6
    Country:
    Bangladesh
    Location:
    Bangladesh
    India's foreign policy for next 5 years: Expanding bilateral ties with Bangladesh vital for New Delhi's 'Act East' targets
    https://www.firstpost.com/india/ind...-new-delhis-act-east-aspirations-6785211.html


    India Karan Pradhan Jun 11, 2019 17:41:07 IST

    Editor's note: Prime Minister Narendra Modi's tour of the Maldives was his first international visit after having taken oath for the second time. His 2014 swearing-in ceremony featured leaders from SAARC nations as special invitees, while in 2019, it was the BIMSTEC leaders and those from Kyrgyzstan and Mauritius who were in attendance, underlining the importance the prime minister places on international relations. This is the fourth in a series of articles that looks at key foreign policy targets for the Modi government as it looks to the next five years.

    ***

    No sooner had the list of invitees for Prime Minister Narendra Modi's swearing-in ceremony on 30 May was made public, than two things became fairly apparent:

    First, and most obvious, diplomatic overtures aimed at Pakistan seem to be off the table for the near future. While Afghanistan was also left off the invitees' list, not a lot needs to be read into it since bilateral relations remain warm and New Delhi-Kabul cooperation has tended to work better in a bilateral capacity than in a defunct regional grouping like the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC).

    Second, and more pertinent, India, it would appear, has hitched its wagon to the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) as far as regional groupings are concerned. And the key piece of that BIMSTEC puzzle, ergo, one of India's key gateways to East Asia is Bangladesh.

    [​IMG]
    File image of Prime Minister Narendra Modi with Bangladesh's prime minister Sheikh Hasina. Reuters

    The Ministry of External Affairs website duly notes that Bangladesh is India's largest trade partner in South Asia — with bilateral trade standing at $9.3 billion in 2017-18. The country is also India's largest development partner with New Delhi extending three lines of credit worth a total of $8 billion since 2010. Collaboration in the power sector is another notable aspect of the relationship, with joint ventures in thermal power projects and the fact that Bangladesh imports 1160 MW of power from India annually.

    Meanwhile, in the past five years, two thorny issues of a territorial nature were also resolved amicably: In 2014, the United Nations' Permanent Court of Arbitration ruled in favour of Bangladesh in a maritime dispute, awarding Bangladesh around 19,500 square kilometres of the 25,000 or so square kilometre sea area of the Bay of Bengal. And in 2015, the two countries signed the India-Bangladesh Land Boundary Agreement that saw the exchange of 162 enclaves — Bangladesh received 111 of them that make up around 17,000 acres of land, while India received 51, that add up to over 7,000 acres of land.

    Alongside these, security cooperation also saw a boost with a series of bilateral agreements relating to such matters as mutual legal assistance, transfer of prisoners, countering terrorism and organised crime, and the circulation of fake currency were inked. It's for good reason then that in May last year in West Bengal's Santiniketan, Modi referred to this as a 'golden chapter' in the history of both countries. In Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina's presence, he said, "A golden chapter is being written in the relationship of India and Bangladesh. Complicated issues related to land boundary and coastal boundary, which seemed impossible to solve at one point of time, were finally resolved."

    Extending the golden chapter

    On Saturday, it was announced that the first set of bilateral discussions between the two countries after Modi returned as prime minister, will be held this week. The biannual dialogue between border guarding forces — one of many bilateral institutional mechanisms between India and Bangladesh — starts on 11 June and will tackle issues like cross-border trafficking and crime that affect both countries.

    This is indicative of the sort of broad-based setup between the countries that has been established over the course of almost 50 years since Bangladesh was liberated. It may be recalled that India was the first country to recognise the erstwhile East Pakistan as an independent nation. The impact of these multiple dialogue mechanisms has been thus far to initiate and sustain dialogue and discussions about almost every aspect of the relationship — the fruit of which is the whole host of agreements being signed and movement on the ground (see: LBA, connectivity etc) between the two countries.


    The aim for the NDA government over the next five years must be twofold: To take India-Bangladesh relations to the next level and consequently give momentum to India's 'Act East' aspirations. And to ensure that all of the warmth in bilateral ties is retained.

    And the first step towards achieving the first target is to resolve the Teesta waters issue. As this article explains, "India's unilateral dam building in the upper reaches of the Teesta combined with climate change effects has adversely affected the river's flow downstream, especially in the dry season, affecting thousands of farmers, fishermen and boatmen in both countries. Bangladesh, the downstream riparian, has demanded a fair share of the Teesta waters in the dry season and minimum guaranteed flows throughout the year in the form of a treaty signed and ratified by both countries."

    Having shown the willingness to sort out territorial disagreements and a commitment to uphold the agreements, the Modi government can kickstart the second chapter of foreign policy under its watch by fast-tracking the route to a resolution to this riparian disagreement. Bangladesh — under Hasina's Awami League governments since 2009 — has always been receptive to India's concerns, seen most clearly in the crackdown on anti-India terror groups within its borders shortly after taking office. In 2010, then finance minister Pranab Mukherjee had remarked, "If you deliver on terror, India will deliver on every other promise." Nearly 10 years on, settling the Teesta issue once and for all would be a good start.

    India's connectivity with Bangladesh is all-encompassing and the two countries are far better connected than India and any other neighbour. Spanning the terrains of rail, road, waterways, sea and air (for people and goods), Bangladesh is the ideal neighbour with which to explore connectivity into East Asia. Both proposed corridors to East Asia — the more-or-less mothballed Bangladesh, China, India and Myanmar (BCIM) Economic Corridor and the relatively less inert Bangladesh, Bhutan, India and Nepal Initiative — include Bangladesh for obvious geographic reasons. Getting Bangladesh on board to help move at least one of these corridors along at a faster tick will be a great way to expand the bilateral.

    Now, onto the pricklier topic of the second target: Retaining India-Bangladesh warmth.

    Tripwires

    The biggest threat to ties between New Delhi and Dhaka isn't Beijing. Bangladesh has thus far managed an admirable balance between India and China, without giving either country the cold shoulder. Further, while the Bangladeshi port of Chittagong features prominently in China's Maritime Silk Route, for now, Dhaka is unlikely to do a flip-flop with New Delhi and throw its doors open to Beijing. An aversion to falling into a deep sinkhole of debt may have a key role to play in that. Instead, the greater risk comes from a stagnation — followed by a gradual deterioration — of relations stemming from India's unwillingness to reciprocate Bangladesh's apparent willingness to address New Delhi's concerns or its domestic policies that end up hurting Bangladeshi interests.

    For starters, India's unwillingness to either condemn Myanmar or pressure it to repatriate Rohingya refugees has not been received all that well in Bangladesh. By abstaining from voting on a UN resolution — sponsored by Bangladesh and the EU — that would take Naypyitaw to task for human rights violations, New Delhi signalled its unwillingness to get involved in what it viewed — rightly or wrongly — as a bilateral disagreement between two sovereign nations. Considering Myanmar is another gateway to East Asia (see: Kaladan Multi-Modal Transit Transport Project, as well as the aforementioned BCIM), India has at this point chosen not to risk overtly upsetting either of these two partners. (Note: It's worth noting that India hasn't left Bangladesh completely out to dry in this matter, with New Delhi providing assistance to Dhaka in the form of Operation Insaniyat to help manage the refugee situation.)

    Along with the refusal to condemn Myanmay, New Delhi's reluctance or inability to set in motion a meaningful negotiation to expedite a resolution to the Teesta waters issue leaves you — in terms of perceptions, at least — with the makings of a regional hegemon that takes what it wants and gives only whatever and whenever it feels like. For now, Hasina has expressed that she's willing to be patient and wait for a deal to be cracked eventually, but patience like the seat of a pair of trousers tends to wear thin after a while. Of India's neighbours and not including Bhutan, only Bangladesh under the Awami League has managed to live in relative harmony with 'Big Brother' India, without any major hiccups in the relationship. But that does not mean this important partnership can be taken for granted.

    Internally, Assam's National Register of Citizens (NRC) has already exacerbated anti-Bangladeshi immigrant sentiment in the state and the divisive NRC found mention in BJP campaigns during the recently-concluded Lok Sabha election. In West Bengal, Mamata Banerjee's own opposition to sharing Teesta water is well-documented. Given the extremely strained relations between the BJP-ruled Centre and Mamata's ruling Trinamool Congress in Bengal, there is a chance the latter may throw a spanner in the works of India-Bangladesh relations to kill two birds with one stone, for want of a better metaphor.

    Over the next five years, it is expected that there will be initiatives and opportunities to broaden and widen India-Bangladesh relations, and while it is important for the Modi government to make the most of those, it is of equal — if not greater importance — not to let regional hegemony or internal politics sour New Delhi's strongest partnership in the region at present.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  2. Homo Sapiens

    Homo Sapiens SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    7,481
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2015
    Ratings:
    +3 / 16,776 / -6
    Country:
    Bangladesh
    Location:
    Bangladesh
    This has turned into a big joke. Indian govt. always promises things which it can not deliver thus loose credibility and make itself a laughing stock.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  3. Quibbler

    Quibbler FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    689
    Joined:
    May 1, 2013
    Ratings:
    +0 / 760 / -12
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    Boundary agreement, addressing trade imbalances, cooperation on terrorism. So much good work has happened between India Bangladesh. And not to mention it is expected even without these that Bangladesh will act against terrorism on its own.

    We are thankful for the support Bangladesh has provided in terrorism, i think you should too. I one of the reasons Bangladesh is stable and growing fast is that it is surrounded by a stable India and you have no military threat. As a neighbor it is India's moral responsibility to give those, but that doesn't mean you cant be thankful.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  4. Homo Sapiens

    Homo Sapiens SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    7,481
    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2015
    Ratings:
    +3 / 16,776 / -6
    Country:
    Bangladesh
    Location:
    Bangladesh
    I beg to differ, Bangladesh's surrounding areas are not entirely stable. All the surrounding states of India and Myanmar have ethnic conflict, insurgency problem, religious feud. Bordering states of Myanmar like Rakhine and Chin are hotbed of insurgency. Not to mention the big Rohingya crisis imposed on us.

    On the other hand, Indian north east is an active volcano of ethnic and religious conflict. Anytime it can explode. It is on part of Bangladesh's prudence that it still not in a conflict with Myanmar. It also helped India to minimize the conflict in North East. So, whatever peace Bangladesh is enjoying is largely due to it's own decision of not to getting involved in mess.
    I wonder what will be the Indian response if Myanmar attack Bangladesh militarily?

    Or more importantly, what if a nutcase like BJP leader Subramanium Swamy who advocate invading and capturing one-third of Bangladesh become PM of India? India is now on a slippery slope of religious and ultra-nationalist extremism. No one know where this will end. Already an extremist like Amit shah is the 2nd person in BJP who says nasty things about Bangladeshis. So you may find it hard to digest, but India itself is the biggest threat of our security. Things are not that alarming now, but there is no guaranty that it will not turn bad.
     
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2019
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  5. Quibbler

    Quibbler FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    689
    Joined:
    May 1, 2013
    Ratings:
    +0 / 760 / -12
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    Its easy to knitpick, but it India Bangladesh relations have been mutually beneficial and cooperative, we talk, we understand each other. We may not agree on everything, but there is a sense that if one asks the other to be done because its critical or as a favor, its done.

    Some problems dont have an outright solution but we have been able to deescalate them . You choose a Subraminam Swamy but you miss out that Bengali have been our presidents, Modi is a huge Pro bangla dude and our national anthem is written by the same person to name a few.

    The fact that swamy is not taken seriously in political circles is a point in itself. We have a positive relation. It think you are unable to appreciate that because you haven't spent time thinking what it would be like if we did'nt.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 5
  6. Nilgiri

    Nilgiri ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    22,271
    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2015
    Ratings:
    +66 / 41,523 / -10
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    Canada
    Go cry about it to your 95% seat mandate govt first....rather than trying to find fault with India.

    Shameless fellow said this earlier:

    https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/bangladesh-general-election-2018.594060/page-18#post-11064670

    Millions of people need to come out now, protest peacefully, continue protest until this monster govt. forced to step down.

    https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/bangladesh-general-election-2018.594060/page-18#post-11064816

    But I am having difficulty to digest the enormity of treachery which this govt. has done against the nation. Up until yesterday, I had a faint hope that, AL may not try to manipulate election massively and may have a plan to surprise everybody by actually holding a modestly fair election. After all it is the oldest political party in BD and had a commendable role for fighting for democracy and giving us freedom. But this robbery was beyond my imagination. Day before yesterday, we could claim Bangladesh a flawed democracy. But now, it is nothing but a full fledged, illegal dictatorship. This is very painful.


    ....yet now crying about big meanie India...and in other threads back to kissing BAL's asscrack.

    You realise that S. Swamy jokes about tons of things?....and Amit Shah referred to illegal BD's (in India) as termites, which is an apt description. If you take it to mean all bangladeshis, that's your prerogative, not ours.

    If Myanmar attacks you....in your own words a country with a monster govt that's a full fledged illegal dictatorship.....why should India do something about it? It will just aid in pressure to remove such an illegal monstrous usurper in your country right?
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  7. nahtanbob

    nahtanbob BANNED

    Messages:
    5,417
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2018
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,631 / -24
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    Myanmar has a crappy military with little ability to project power
    the real issue is what if bangladesh decides to settle things militarily with Myanmar
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  8. Bilal9

    Bilal9 ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    10,579
    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2014
    Ratings:
    +11 / 16,821 / -4
    Country:
    Bangladesh
    Location:
    United States
    I find it hard to take a Hindutva leader like Swamy seriously, when he couldn't stop his own daughter from marrying a Muslim boy. I mean - WTF??

    All this hot air - WTF for??

    Well more important is - what is IN this conflict for us??

    Should we risk a decade of industrial development for attacking a third rate North Korea 2.0 when no one cares about the Rohingya either? Are the Rohingya worth that much (in the end) for us? The Europeans and Americans are simply offering 'humanitarian' lip service largely so far and they don't care either....

    Good questions to ponder.

    For the Myanmarese, it is a great opportunity to unify their horribly fractious country by falling together under a unifying flag to resist enemy non-Simians, but I feel we Bangladeshis have very little (if any) to gain. The world is full of 3rd world sh*tholes, what's one more, even if it is right next door??

    No one gave us the mantle to right all wrongs.

    THINK!
     
  9. Quibbler

    Quibbler FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    689
    Joined:
    May 1, 2013
    Ratings:
    +0 / 760 / -12
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    He is not taken seriously. I really do find it surprising that you think Subramaniam Swamy is some powerful leader. He is a leader on the very sidelines on the BJP. He is know for his stupid/controversial remarks, but he is a long time BJP they dont sever ties with him.

    Every month he gives stupid remarks against BJP as well. Arun jaitley and Swami are like batman joker, always at loggerhead. Nobody messes with him though as he is good lawyer, and can make good cases out of thin air and make your loife hard.

    You wont find a single issue of importance in India where he hasn't given a stupid remark on. If you take him seriously dont.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  10. Arthur

    Arthur FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,611
    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2014
    Ratings:
    +0 / 2,834 / -0
    Country:
    Bangladesh
    Location:
    Germany
    No one took Trump seriously either. Now look at the circus going on.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  11. Quibbler

    Quibbler FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    689
    Joined:
    May 1, 2013
    Ratings:
    +0 / 760 / -12
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    true
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  12. nahtanbob

    nahtanbob BANNED

    Messages:
    5,417
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2018
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,631 / -24
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    you think too rationally. USA and EU have discouraged Myanmar with maximum sanctions. Myanmar is not a priority. 900,000 wretched poor people make only a difference so far.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1