I wasn't advising you lol. I was Just explaining your situation and suggesting a way out. Meh.
Emergency use is the main thing. And no, you will not get sued for not allowing an option, you have two options, either get vaccinated or not get vaccinated. If you have co-morbidities then you will not be given covaxin and recipients can simply deny taking covaxin if they don't trust it, you are also required to sign a consent form. The data published in both phase 1 & 2 trials showed the vaccine is safe and we're only vaccinating frontline workers who on an average is young.
Lol! Did you not read what I already said? The vaccine has already been supplied to the states, 16.5 million doses were already supplied for frontline workers before we send to other countries. That is more than half of the requirement, and we are vaccinating nearly 3 Lakh people a day.
SII has already manufactured 100 million doses and still running production. You taking cheapshot and running around embarrassing yourself with old theories to show your typical Pakistani jealousy of being able to do zip-zilch-nada. We will give those countries vaccine for whatever reason, we may even end up sending you alms, if not make you buy from us. You should know 2/3rd of vaccines made in the world are from Serum Institute, you can take as many shots at them as you want, but they're the ones who will probably be going to end up vaccinating your sorry arse.
Such an indiot, pretending to know what you're talking about for your little fanboy brigade.
"recipients can simply deny taking covaxin if they don't trust it, you are also required to sign a consent form. The data published in both phase 1 & 2 trials showed the vaccine is safe "
I have demonstrated with references that Indian citizens cannot choose the Oxford vaccine over the Bharat vaccine. If your grandma declines the Bharat vaccine, correctly citing a lack of confirmatory data on immunogenicty (never mind safety, a vitamin shot is bloody safe but it isn't going to work against Covid....so your comment about safety IGNORES the absence of immunogenicty data published, hence - as is your SOP - you try to deflect the reader with talk of shafffteee), then she will not be given the Oxford vaccine.
Why should they be ordered to "trust" a vaccine without published phase 1 and 2 data on efficacy?
What police state is this where the media is told to shut up, regulators decide on a whim if a vaccine is safe, and individuals who complain about side effects get taken to court?
However many you've manufactured and stockpiled, I don't care. Why are people being ordered to take the incomplete Bharat vaccine if you have these stocks available? You haven't explained this.
Regarding 3 lakh per day, again, that is irrelevant as a raw number. It's like saying 3000 in India get infected per day vs 300 in Madagascar. Numbers per day per FIXED number of overall population can be compared, hence the data presented by the BBC article is most appropriate for making conclusions about whether India is up to scratch with other vaccine producers.