What's new

Indian media falsely claims ex-Pak diplomat admits 300 killed in Balakot airstrike

Jackdaws

BANNED
Jan 20, 2010
12,349
-48
10,693
Country
India
Location
India
He clearly says: "Jis meh uno nay 300 marna tha."

However, Indian version says: "Jis meh uno nay 300 mar (audio cut)."


@drumstick @Bambi @Jackdaws
This is the auqaat of your mainstream national media. Is there some disease in India that people survive on lies 24/7?
Yes. Pretty much - except for the old school media chaps who have now moved to online platforms - almost all Indian news outlets show rubbish and the people lap it up.
 

Jackdaws

BANNED
Jan 20, 2010
12,349
-48
10,693
Country
India
Location
India
And even if he said it - which it seems he didn't from the video posted - he is not in Govt. It is not official. Indian media just needs to fill its airwaves with rubbish - mostly Godi media trying to divert attention. Imagine if Pakistan latched onto everything that crazy Subramaniam Swamy says...
 

Areesh

ELITE MEMBER
Mar 30, 2010
37,787
2
75,836
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
On Friday, January 9, Indian news outlets reported that former Pakistani diplomat, “Agha” Hilaly has admitted that the February 26, 2019 Balakot airstrike saw 300 casualties on the Pakistani side. The aftermath of the Balakot airstrike had given rise to media reports placing the casualties at 300 citing “top government sources” even Defense Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said that the casualty figure will not be provided. International media had subsequently reported that no one had died in the strikes.

The story was reported by ANI, Republic, The Times of India, Moneycontrol, WION, Hindustan Times, NE Now, Odisha TV, Jagran, Swarajya, Lokmat, Oneindia, Deccan Herald, Business Today, Livemint, DNA, The Quint, News18 India, HW News, India Today, CNBC TV18, ABP News and India TV among others. Many of these reports are republished ANI story.

The reports say that in a TV news debate Hilaly said, “India crossed the international border and did an act of war in which at least 300 were reported dead. Our target was different from theirs. We targeted their high command. That was our legitimate target because they are men of the military. We subconsciously accepted that a surgical strike — a limited action — did not result in any casualty. Now we have subconsciously told them that, whatever they will do, we’ll do only that much and won’t escalate.”

We looked for the debate on YouTube and found that it was uploaded by HUM news as part of a program called “Agenda Pakistan”. The topic of the debate was “By using the vocabulary of the enemy (in this context “surgical strike”) is Pakistan making its own case weak?”. Zafar Hilaly begins to answer this question at around 4:17 minutes. At about 5:14 minutes he says, “What you did, India, was an act of war. India ne jo kiya, international boundary ko cross karke ek act of war. Jisme kam se kam 300 logo ko unhone marna tha.” In English, this translates to, “What you did, India was an act of war. By crossing the international boundary India committed an act of war in which they intended to kill at least 300 people.”

The very next sentence at 5:29 minutes shows the diplomat stating that the Indian operation had failed — “Ittifaqan vo nahi mare, humne [India ne] ek football field ko bomb kiya. (Coincidentally, they [Pakistani people] did not die and India bombed a football field.)”

In fact, prior to the portion of the segment made viral, Hilaly was actually speaking about India’s intention to kill 300 on the Pakistani side. At about 4:30 minutes, he states, “Aapne aake ek madrasa ko, bakaul aapka intention ye tha ki ek madrasa mein jis mein 300 bachche bakaul aapke padh rahe the, udhar aake aapne strike karna tha. Iske maane 300 logo ko maarne ka irada rakha tha aapne. Vo the nahi, vo galat tha, vo hua nahi. Isliye ek football field mein jaake apna bomb phek diya humne. (It is said that your intention was to strike at a madrasa where 300 children were studying. This means that your intention was to kill 300 people. They were not there, this [information] was wrong, it [strike] did not happen so you threw your bomb in a football field.)”

From the video transcript is clear that at no point the Pakistani diplomat admitted that there were 300 casualties in the Balakot airstrike.

What is the origin of the claim?

None of the media organisations referred to the original video in their reports. But Republic and NE Times embedded a video uploaded by a Twitter user. If we compare the original video with the one embedded by Republic, there is an abrupt cut around 0:7-0:9 seconds. The word “marna (to kill)” sounds as if Hilaly said “mara (killed)”. The ‘n’ pronunciation has been edited out.


His statement right after the above claim has also been removed in the viral clip. This was where Hilaly makes the claim that the Indian operation failed and the airforce instead bombed a football field.

Furthermore, the viral video has been inverted and screen-recorded. The original video shows the damaged trees of Balakot and the doctored video shows a picture of PM Narendra Modi in military fatigue. The doctored video also doesn’t feature the names of the people in the panel and the border is pink unlike the white border in the original video.

Zafar Hilaly himself confirmed that his statement was “cut, spliced and edited”.



Nearly every Indian media organisation reported that former Pakistani diplomat Zafar Hilaly admitted that the Indian airstrike killed 300 people in Balakot. The reports were based on a clipped and doctored panel discussion shared on social media.

 

TNT

SENIOR MEMBER
Jun 2, 2019
3,728
-1
5,848
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
This shows the indian public are utter stupid morons and their media and govt thinks so too, hence such 3rd class fabricated news is spread and all the indians start doing nagan dance. The hilarious part is they will not believe even if u show them proof, the interviewed guy himself is denying indian crap but no they wont believe.
 

Qutb-ud-din Aybak

SENIOR MEMBER
Jan 22, 2015
6,901
1
7,853
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Indian media today is claiming that a Pakistani diplomat have accepted 300 dead in balakot strikes.

That former diplomat is named as "agha hilaly".
View attachment 705218
View attachment 705219 View attachment 705220


Now what is the interesting fact here:
View attachment 705221
View attachment 705222
He died in 2001. 18 years before balakot.

Conclusion:
Hence prove that I have wasted time in verifying the facts when Indian media is involve in the story.
Latest development.
Indian media exposed ANI and Indian media.
He clearly says: "Jis meh uno nay 300 marna tha."

However, Indian version says: "Jis meh uno nay 300 mar (audio cut)."


@drumstick @Bambi @Jackdaws
This is the auqaat of your mainstream national media. Is there some disease in India that people survive on lies 24/7?

ANI is behind it.
 

Vapnope

SENIOR MEMBER
Nov 11, 2015
3,361
14
5,063
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Modi bhakts are the dumbest yet most vile people. Imagine their desperation that in absence of any discreet official proof from India, they are resorting to doctored videos. Some modi Bhakts were jumping and howling here on PDF as well.
 

Globenim

SENIOR MEMBER
Aug 19, 2011
2,564
-1
4,378
Country
China
Location
Thailand
So all these independently opeerating free Indian media channels repeated the exact same misinformation. 🙄
 

ASKardar

FULL MEMBER
Oct 2, 2019
598
1
1,310
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Multiple mainstream Indian media channels falsely reported that former Pakistani diplomat in a debate accepted that 300 people were killed in Balakot strike. The video was edited.


On January 9, 2021, multiple mainstream Indian media houses reported that former Pakistani diplomat accepted that 300 people were killed in Balakot surgical strike done by India. India Today, CNN News 18, Republic Bharat, Times of India and many other media houses reported that a former Pakistani diplomat, Zafar Hilaly in a TV debate admitted that 300 people were killed in 2019's Balakot strike. The media reported that Hilaly in a TV debated said, "India crossed the international border and did an act of war in which at least 300 were reported dead. Our target was different from theirs. We targeted their high command. That was our legitimate target because they are men of the military. We subconsciously accepted that a surgical strike -- a limited action -- did not result in any casualty. Now we have subconsciously told them that, whatever they will do, we'll do only that much and won't escalate."








Balakot Strike: On February 26, 2019, the Indian Air Force did an airstrike at the de facto border in the disputed region of Kashmir as a retaliation to Pulwama attack that happened on February 14, 2019, in which 40 CRPF personnel were killed. The IAF dropped bombs in the vicinity of the town of Balakot in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province in Pakistan.

Media houses during the Balakot strike had reported that over 300 'militants' were killed in the airstrike. However, foreign media houses refuted the claim, saying no lives were lost in the airstrike. According to the BBC, only one house was damaged slightly, some trees were fallen and a man was injured in the Balakot strike.


 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom