What's new

Indian Army killings of innocent civilians at Lanjot village, Nakyal on 25th Feb 2000

LeGenD

MODERATOR
Aug 28, 2006
11,650
54
13,281
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
@Osiris

What does 1971 (a one-time event) have anything to do with the topic on hand? Which country and/or nation welcomes split of its territory? There are claims and counter-claims on top. Jammu & Kashmir is a persistent problem in comparison and Indian atrocities are a recurring theme in this region. These two developments are not comparable.

Stick to the topic on hand.
 

Psychic

SENIOR MEMBER
Mar 30, 2015
3,165
29
5,611
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Irregulars of LeT killed civilians in Kashmir
Regulars of Indian army killed civilians in Kashmir

Hence proved

LeT = Indian Army
Most likely they and their ikhwani brothers killed their own civilians and blamed LeT for that.

Afterall they are masters of false flag.
 
Aug 19, 2012
8,976
118
18,302
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
yeah! bharatis are soldiers not murdering sodomites and rapists, hence respect for them must be enforced here. anyone speaking against them should be perma-banned starting with me.
there are ways to address their atrocities instead of crossing that line of humanity...if you start posting decimated bodies of Indian soliders, tomorrow they will start sharing vids of TTP playing football with the heads of our Jawans....Iran will start posting pics of US soliders in Iraq. Think wisely & act wisely, soldiers fight as they are told to do so, no point disrespecting those who are dead
 

Osiris

SENIOR MEMBER
Sep 16, 2015
2,563
-44
2,221
Country
India
Location
India
Irregulars of LeT killed civilians in Kashmir
Regulars of Indian army killed civilians in Kashmir

Hence proved

LeT = Indian Army
No, read Praveen Swami's report carefully.. India army also largely employed irregulars to give Pakistan a reply in it's own language.

It was only to avenge the killing Indian army soldiers did Indian soldiers brought back the heads of Pakistani army soldiers.
 

Areesh

ELITE MEMBER
Mar 30, 2010
38,085
2
77,031
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
No, read Praveen Swami's report carefully.. India army also largely employed irregulars to give Pakistan a reply in it's own language.

It was only to avenge the killing Indian army soldiers did Indian soldiers brought back the heads of Pakistani army soldiers.
Only difference is that you admit that you employ irregulars and regulars to kill civilians

We don't

Talk about lack of morality in a certain society
 

Osiris

SENIOR MEMBER
Sep 16, 2015
2,563
-44
2,221
Country
India
Location
India
@Osiris

What does 1971 (a one-time event) have anything to do with the topic on hand? Which country and/or nation welcomes split of its territory? There are claims and counter-claims on top. Jammu & Kashmir is a persistent problem in comparison and Indian atrocities are a recurring theme in this region. These two developments are not comparable.

Stick to the topic on hand.
As I understand the topic at hand is, conduct of an army, when they are deployed in areas of insurgencies.

Conduct of Pakistani army when it was deployed in its own areas of insurgencies, is very relevant to
the topic at hand.

Pakistanis can not sweep the atrocities of Pakistan's army under a rug and then try claim a moral high ground on Kashmir.

As far Kushan Pushpara incident is concerned, there too have been claims and counter claims, as you say there were in East Bengal, so why shouldn't they be discussed together ?
Only difference is that you admit that you employ irregulars and regulars to kill civilians

We don't

Talk about lack of morality in a certain society
India army or Indian government does not, those are Praveen Swami words.

We employ same amount plausible deniability, that Pakistan does, when it kills Indian civilians may that be in Kashmir or in Mumbai.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom