- Nov 9, 2009
So India which is some five times bigger was at disadvantage and Pakistan which had to send army a thousand miles away to fight a bigger enemy had the advantage, what a loser you are and before you try to grow a brain, two front meaning, fighting with Indian army on the border and with Muktis in the streets and cities.You don't know what "two front war" means. It was India that was fighting a war on both her eastern and western fronts. You had the advantage of making India fighting a two front war, and lost half your country.
As someone said you creatures created the zero so you can add and collect as many as you like, do you think there were 90000 soldiers, the reality is there were just 300000 combat troops, rest were like police, civil defence and their families... If you had any brains then you would have noticed Children in that stamp you are gloating on.You can post that image of one PoW till the cows come home, but that only serves to remind you that you had 90,000 PoWs that Indians had to transport to safety in 1971.
Do you understand ratios or magnitudes? 90,000:1?
Gangus are the least to talk of shame.Why? Because I spoke the unpleasant truth? Is there anything factually wrong in my post? That was a stamp released by the Government of al-Bakistan, begging the world to free their 90,000 PoWs. Shame, shame.
When tables are somewhat even, you need the likes of US and Israel to save you from humiliation, both in Kargil and now Ladakh. Do you have the shame and stomach to ask your Netas and warlords how did so many of your soldiers ended up as POW in Ladakh with badly needing body work.