• Tuesday, October 15, 2019

India, Pakistan threatened to unleash missiles at each other: Sources

Discussion in 'Pakistan Strategic Forces' started by Pied Piper, Mar 17, 2019.

  1. Tejas Spokesman

    Tejas Spokesman BANNED

    Messages:
    1,042
    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2018
    Ratings:
    +0 / 201 / -2
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    Old wreckage in display since 1977.
     
  2. Windjammer

    Windjammer ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    31,782
    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Ratings:
    +146 / 102,582 / -3
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    old wreckage of what. ???
     
  3. Max

    Max SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    7,333
    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2014
    Ratings:
    +7 / 9,374 / -10
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    If Kashmir issue don't get resolved we may soon see exchange of missiles as well.
     
  4. I S I

    I S I SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    7,457
    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2015
    Ratings:
    +4 / 10,966 / -29
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Nor it works by asking bobs&vagene, pajeet.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  5. Arsalan 345

    Arsalan 345 SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    3,152
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2016
    Ratings:
    +0 / 2,719 / -3
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Who told you that number of missiles in Pakistan posses is lower than indian missiles? Lol
     
    Last edited: Mar 17, 2019
  6. xyxmt

    xyxmt ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    20,368
    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2012
    Ratings:
    +7 / 17,582 / -11
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Canada
    India wont be able to fire back after Pakistan is done with her first missile strike, Now you must have realized that Pakistan has much better intelligence that India and 18 Pakistani target would be the one that would bring India to her knees, even Pakistani conventional bomb can create shock and Awe in India. stop fooling yourself anymore, you are not what you pretend to be and we are 3 times what you think we are.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  7. Jungibaaz

    Jungibaaz MODERATOR

    Messages:
    6,410
    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2010
    Ratings:
    +72 / 12,462 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    All PAF munitions were to make nearby actual targets and people shit their pants, that's what was a measured response seeing as neither side was willing to target civilians or millitary targets themselves. The PAF basically simulated actual strikes on a few targets across the LoC, it was to send a message and prove our capability. Even if there's a lid being kept on all things inside India so that the public don't catch a wind, the people who needed to hear the message from PAF, recieved it and then some.

    And yes, a major war would see us at a disadvantage, everyone already knows why we maintain a credible nuclear deterrence. Tell us what else is new.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  8. Wa Muhammada

    Wa Muhammada FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,247
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2017
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,336 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Scary sh1t!
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  9. OCguy

    OCguy FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,071
    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2013
    Ratings:
    +3 / 1,289 / -0
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    I had a recurring nightmare growing up where I would see the first mushroom cloud on the horizon.

    The only thing that made it less scary was learning about the weapons in detail.
     
  10. Wa Muhammada

    Wa Muhammada FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,247
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2017
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,336 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    How many kilotons is the average nuke which pak & India possess?
     
  11. WarKa DaNG

    WarKa DaNG FULL MEMBER

    Messages:
    1,603
    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2014
    Ratings:
    +0 / 601 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Still better than killing trees and a crow
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  12. Zarvan

    Zarvan ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    47,638
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Ratings:
    +84 / 49,346 / -13
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Only you could have come up with this dumb analysis. The moment we would be running out of Missiles that would mean at least last 100 Missiles would be carrying nuclear war heads that would there would be no India
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  13. Jugger

    Jugger SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,825
    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Ratings:
    +1 / 2,443 / -7
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    France
    This is the important point to ponder.
    India has already established the new set of rules regarding Kashmir and Pakistan.
    The new rule is that a price has to be paid for mischief in Kashmir.
    It is India that has crossed the border after 40 years to carry out the attack. But India’s over confidence cost a Mig 21, which is unfortunate but beneficial in the long run.
    The important point to be noted is that India has not targeted any Pakistani military installations or personal, so the chance of leading to war is negligible.
    Pakistan has downed the Indian Mig 21 after it had crossed over to Pakistan and not in Indian territory, it has right of defending its air space. Also Pakistan has not targeted/ destroyed any Indian military installations thereby not requiring a response from the Indian side.
     
  14. Jungibaaz

    Jungibaaz MODERATOR

    Messages:
    6,410
    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2010
    Ratings:
    +72 / 12,462 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    It's not our fault if following unrest (which despite you blame us for), you rile up your own people and media, and then defy sane calls from PM of Pakistan to allow for an investigation and open peace overtures. Subsequently launching a politically motivated airspace violation, at our expense.

    This was done in 2016 and India got away with the drama. What's changed isn't your idea of the price of unrest in kashmir, which you say is a strike inside Pakistan. What has changed is that the price of a strike in Pakistan, is the price of an equal if not greater strike in India, and possibly a Mig-21 for interest.

    Senior people in your millitary did not like the idea of using the Indian army for bollywood-esque drama back in 2016. And now no serious person in your ranks will want a superficial drama to be created in future by your politicians, there is a larger threat you pose to us and the immediate threat is payback for the unequal way this conflict ended. But even that doesn't fit with your analysis of the initial Indian provocation.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  15. AZ1

    AZ1 SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    3,740
    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2017
    Ratings:
    +1 / 3,516 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Every one pakistan and india discussing nuclear as it is just a fire cracker on sky. If just one city hit with nuclear it will effect whole country because it will spread through air. Hope it will not come to that and just time pass mouth game from both countriesm