What's new

India makes Bangladesh’s part of the Teesta river into a dead canal!

Black_cats

SENIOR MEMBER
Dec 31, 2010
7,588
-5
11,421
November 24, 2021
OPINION
India makes Bangladesh’s part of the Teesta river into a dead canal!

India takes water even from friendly countries

ByHafizur Talukdar


It is India which is a very self-realist state in South Asia. Self-proclaimed as the world’s largest democracy, India has no respect for the rights of its neighbours. India knows only taking from others, doesn’t know giving to others. For example, India has been deceiving Bangladesh for many years. India didn’t sign its promised ‘Teesta water-sharing agreement’ with Bangladesh’ from 1983. India always says that it will sign the treaty with Bangladesh immediately. But it is 2021.

Teesta, this famous river that came to Bangladesh after crossing the border, was once young forever. Settlements have sprung up in large areas including Bangladesh’s Lalmonirhat, Nilphamari, Rangpur, and Kurigram, around this river. The world-famous Bhavaya music tune has been created in a match with the livelihood of the people in the region and the flow of the river.

But the Teesta is no longer known. It is sitting to die from being weak. During the monsoon season, the river only has water for a couple of months. And before the rains end, it turns into a dead canal. This time the Teesta has become waterless before the end of the Bengali month of Bhadra
Above all, India has made the Teesta River into a dead canal. India always talks about human rights, democracy. But I say that it is a mockery, deception, pretension. First, India should leave these bad habits, then it should talk about moral ethics
India is getting an opportunity to cultivate in the dry season by diverting water through the Ghazaldoba Barrage to the irrigation canal. And as a result, Teesta is dying day by day in Bangladesh due to a lack of water.

Vast chars (river island) have arisen in the heart of the river. The Indian government is controlling the normal flow of the Teesta by building dams. As a result of the unilateral withdrawal of water, this river in Bangladesh has dried up and is now dying.

Meanwhile, in the dry season, India withheld water, but in the rainy season, all the gates of Ghazaldoba Barrage were opened to control the water level. As a result, large areas of several districts around the Teesta in Bangladesh became flood-prone. Houses and cultivable lands were washed away by the floods.
According to the Water Development Board (Paubo) of Bangladesh, the 400-km long Teesta River flows through India’s Sikkim and Darjeeling-Jalpaiguri in northern West Bengal, Lalmonirhat in Bangladesh, Rangpur through Chilmari in Kurigram and joins the Brahmaputra River at 124 km.

According to the Dalia office (Paubo) in Bangladesh, in 1977, the Bangladesh government adopted a plan to build a barrage, head regulator, and closure dam on the Teesta River. When the matter came to the notice of the Indian authorities, they built a 921.53-meter-long barrage at Ghazaldoba in Jalpaiguri (63 km upstream from Bangladesh). Through this barrage, India is irrigating its agricultural lands with 80 percent of the total water flow of the Teesta.

Dalia Paubo, an engineer, said the remaining 20 percent of the water was released downstream into India, but after crossing a distance of 63 km, the current became very weak on the way to the barrage area in Doani point in Bangladesh. He said that at a time when India was closing the gates of their barrages if a minimum of one thousand cusecs of water was supplied to the irrigation canal, there would be no way to release it downstream.

Ashwini (Bengali month of crop season) is without water: I visited the Teesta Barrage area of Hatibandha Upazila in Lalmonirhat on October 16 (in the afternoon) and saw that all the 44 gates of the barrage were closed. As a result, as much water as is available is diverted to the Teesta Irrigation Canal. As a result, the main river is almost waterless. This time Teesta seems to have become waterless at the beginning of Ashwini. Not far from the barrage is a vast expanse of char. On the other side, through a canal-like section, some water flowed downstream.

The water level goes down: People in the riparian areas say that as the depth of the river decreases, floods occur in large areas during the monsoon season. Buildings, including the houses, were washed away.

On the other hand, due to the lack of water in the river during the dry season, there is an irrigation crisis in the riparian areas while the groundwater level is going down and the water in the tube wells does not compensate.

Meanwhile, the farmers are counting the losses year after year as they are not able to irrigate due to lack of water, even after cultivating various crops including potatoes in the char lands.

River researcher and director of the Riverine People (a rights organization in Bangladesh) Tuhin Wadud said, “The Teesta is a very good river compared to other rivers. Occupancy pollution is relatively low here. But the river is dying day by day as India unilaterally withdraws water year after year. In this situation, the implementation of the river water sharing agreement has become very urgent.”

Nazrul Islam Haqqani, president of the Save Teesta River, Save the Struggle Council, said, “The Teesta River is the lifeblood of the Rangpur region. But that river is now dying. We have been agitating for a fair share of water for a long time and will continue to do so. Besides, I think the implementation of the Teesta master plan in the government’s plan should be expedited.”

Above all, India has made the Teesta River into a dead canal. India always talks about human rights, democracy. But I say that it is a mockery, deception, pretension. First, India should leave these bad habits, then it should talk about moral ethics.

 

mb444

SENIOR MEMBER
Apr 18, 2012
4,210
1
7,032
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
BD needs to immediately progress with the Teesta project with the chinese....its not about reacting to indian provocation , it is simply about self preservation.
 

The Ronin

SENIOR MEMBER
Mar 24, 2017
3,316
0
7,877
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Japan
Better take care of our internal enemies too who killed and still killing lots of river, canal and reservoir with illegal occupation. Some rivers even tuned into dead canals.
 

bluesky

ELITE MEMBER
Jun 14, 2016
12,067
0
13,750
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Japan
Let the Chinese dam the source of the Teesta upstream, then there will be leverage to deal with these Sanghis.
Please do not imagine things. Teesta originates in the southeast of the Himalayas and not on the north of the Himalayas in China. So, how can China influence the flow of water? Read the wiki citation below:

"Pauhunri is a mountain in the Eastern Himalayas. It is located on the border of Sikkim, India and Tibet and is situated about 75 km northeast of Kangchenjunga. It marks the origin of Teesta river".

People were crying only a few months before that India is flooding BD and now the same people are shouting India is stopping water.

So, please someone tell us what is the reality. I am perplexed. I am also perplexed at the Teesta Beautification Project taken by the govt. Will this project solve the issue of drought and flooding really?

There must be something fishy going on. Can some one explain these things?
 

Bilal9

ELITE MEMBER
Feb 4, 2014
19,116
2
30,166
Country
Bangladesh
Location
United States
Please do not imagine things. Teesta originates in the southeast of the Himalayas and not on the north of the Himalayas in China. So, how can China influence the flow of water? Read the wiki citation below:

"Pauhunri is a mountain in the Eastern Himalayas. It is located on the border of Sikkim, India and Tibet and is situated about 75 km northeast of Kangchenjunga. It marks the origin of Teesta river".

People were crying only a few months before that India is flooding BD and now the same people are shouting India is stopping water.

So, please someone tell us what is the reality. I am perplexed. I am also perplexed at the Teesta Beautification Project taken by the govt. Will this project solve the issue of drought and flooding really?

There must be something fishy going on. Can some one explain these things?
Well sorry @bluesky bhai - I mixed up the origin of Teesta with the origin of Brahmaputra.

You are right. Why spend hundreds of crores in beautifying Teesta if Indians are going to stop the flow of water in any case.
 

bluesky

ELITE MEMBER
Jun 14, 2016
12,067
0
13,750
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Japan
Well sorry @bluesky bhai - I mixed up the origin of Teesta with the origin of Brahmaputra.

You are right. Why spend hundreds of crores in beautifying Teesta if Indians are going to stop the flow of water in any case.
However, the solution to issues like overflooding and drought lies in the construction of ANOTHER TEESTA BARRAGE at its mouth with the Jamuna. This is what I have been saying here all the time.

With a new barrage in place, you will get a ten-fold area to conserve water just at the end of the rainy season that can be used for irrigation in the winter.

I again say the present barrage has been placed in the wrong location. It should have been placed near the Jamuna. Better late than never. Another one should be built near the Jamuna.

However, our govt people are running after a Beautification Project. Bloody stupid Gadhas!!!
 

bluesky

ELITE MEMBER
Jun 14, 2016
12,067
0
13,750
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Japan
Action speaks louder than the words. We will see who is actually right , you or GoB!
You can write it somewhere that a beautification project that also includes raising the river banks will cause almost no floods. You will say, but the river will be dredged to contain water, so what is the problem with irrigation? Know that this will not guarantee irrigation water in winter.

For the sake of debate, if we assume the river depth is dredged to a total of 10 m, then it will create a reservoir for {(100km length x 1000m) x 10m depth} = 1,000,000 m3 of water. Now, you will ask me what will be the effect if the dykes are again 10m high in the beautification planning? Is it not that the reservoir capacity then will be {(100 km x 1000m) x (10 + 10)m depth = 2,000,000 m3?

However, Sir, this figure is only valid when a new Barrage is built at the Teesta mouth that will stop water from flowing out to Jamuna. Without a barrage the water amounting to (2,000,000m3 - 1,000,000m3) = 1,000,000m3 will just flow out of Teesta.

So, the project cannot create a large-scale water reservoir without building another BARRAGE at the Teesta mouth before falling into the Jamuna. The two dykes and the barrage will unitedly contain a very high quantity of water.

You have placed the current Teesta barrage at the wrong place and after you complete the beautification project, you will then be cursing China although China is not the planner of this project. GoB engineers are the planners and China will do only the construction.

If you have questions regarding my viewpoint, please ask a civil engineer with DESIGN experience in channel hydraulics/ water engineering. He is qualified if he knows about the equation below:

1638056085265.png
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)


Top Bottom