• Saturday, August 15, 2020

India and Pakistan Locked in a Nuclear Naval Arms Race

Discussion in 'Central & South Asia' started by HariPrasad, Mar 28, 2015.

  1. HariPrasad

    HariPrasad BANNED

    Messages:
    14,081
    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2013
    Ratings:
    +3 / 12,162 / -23
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    India and Pakistan Locked in a Nuclear Naval Arms Race
    A new report provides a useful summary of the naval nuclear dynamics in the Indian Ocean.

    A while back, I reported on the murky details surrounding Pakistan’s sea-based nuclear deterrent. Much of it remains a mystery, including its future submarine force.

    Conversely, the Indian Navy still does not have a capable ballistic missile with which to arm the INS Arihant – New Delhi’s only ballistic missile submarine (which only began sea trials in December). India’s submarine fleet is also experiencing difficulties in maintaining its readiness rate, which has dropped below 40 percent.

    However, both India and Pakistan are set to continue to develop their naval nuclear forces, as a new report by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace points out. Yet, this should not automatically be a cause for alarm, Iskander Rehman, the author of a newly released Carnegie policy paper, argues.

    “By further institutionalizing relations between their navies and by insisting on stronger transparency with regard to naval nuclear developments, both countries may succeed in adding a greater degree of stability to what otherwise promises to be a dangerously volatile maritime environment,” he notes.

    Rehman highlights a few other interesting points about the naval nuclear dynamics in the Indian Ocean:

    • India’s pursuit of a sea-based nuclear strike force is the next logical step in its quest for an assured retaliatory capability.
    • To enjoy an effective sea-based deterrent vis-à-vis China, India’s other prospective nuclear adversary, New Delhi has to develop larger SSBNs with greater missile carriage capacity and more powerful nuclear reactors.
    • Pakistan’s naval nuclear ambitions are fueled primarily by the sense of a growing conventional, rather than strategic, imbalance between New Delhi and Islamabad.
    • By dispersing low-yield nuclear weapons across a variety of naval platforms, Islamabad aims to acquire escalation dominance and greater strategic depth and to reduce the incentives for a preemptive strike on its nuclear assets.
    Interestingly, Rehman also underlines that, “the submarine-based leg of India’s nuclear triad will have a major impact on the nation’s existing command-and-control arrangements.”

    Writing for The Diplomat, Amit R. Saksena, already elaborated on this point back in January. “For a sea-based asset, where deterrence is primarily achieved by long-term radio silence, and launching control is delegated to seniority on board the vessel, the existing command and control model is not applicable,” Saksena emphasized.

    India’s nuclear warfare policy is predicated on a No First-Use (NFU) doctrine; consequently, New Delhi needs to field a credible second-strike capability.

    “Just like Pakistan’s tactical nuclear weapons (TnWs), New Delhi will essentially be delegating launch control to field officers on board the submarine, massively increasing the probability of incidental firing,” according to Saksena.

    Furthermore, he points out another issue. “India, like Pakistan, is known to keep its nuclear warheads de-mated from the delivery mechanisms. For the INS Arihant to fulfill its operational responsibility, SLBMs mounted with nuclear warheads will have to be deployed on the vessel.”

    Rehman does not discuss this issue in any detail. Nor, despite highlighting the problem, does he elaborate on what a new command and control model for India’s strategic forces might look like.

    However, the report contains an interesting section on what lessons Islamabad and New Delhi can derive from naval nuclear operations during the Cold War, as well China’s future role in shaping naval nuclear policies in the Indian Ocean.

    At the end of the report, which is worthwhile reading in its entirety, Rehman concludes that “the present period offers a precious window of opportunity for both New Delhi and Islamabad to shape, rather than be shaped, by the emerging naval nuclear regime in South Asia.” Yet the window for the implementation of new confidence-building measures between the two countries is shrinking rapidly.

    India and Pakistan Locked in a Nuclear Naval Arms Race | The Diplomat
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 16, 2017
  2. Tshering22

    Tshering22 ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    17,877
    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2010
    Ratings:
    +19 / 21,073 / -15
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    No we are not.

    We are simply far ahead on our own and the nuclear Naval arm was never meant for Pakistan.

    It is simply an insurance policy against bigger powers, should someone try to invade us.
     
  3. SrNair

    SrNair ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    16,477
    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2013
    Ratings:
    +4 / 15,929 / -28
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    There is no competition between India and Pakistan.
    Quite Simple ,Pakistan is not a rival to us ,not any more.

    And our own R&D is far better than Pakistan but way less than China.But we will solve it in near future.
     
  4. Donatello

    Donatello RETIRED TTA

    Messages:
    10,576
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Ratings:
    +24 / 11,219 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Yea, like USA? Those subs would be destroyed before they left for the sea. So i am not sure what bigger powers are you talking about.
     
  5. Tshering22

    Tshering22 ELITE MEMBER

    Messages:
    17,877
    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2010
    Ratings:
    +19 / 21,073 / -15
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    1- Do you know what Arihant and Aridhaman use?

    2- Do you know what are their weaknesses?

    3- Do you know what the IN has planned and against who?

    4- Do you think that USA will invade us when we are going more smoothly with them, than ever before?

    If you cannot say for sure for any of the above, then please stop beating your gas bag and come with something substantial.
     
  6. Donatello

    Donatello RETIRED TTA

    Messages:
    10,576
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Ratings:
    +24 / 11,219 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    USA-Iran relationship was at one time going very smoothly.......but then educating an ignorant Indian shouldn't be my concern....i fully agree.
     
  7. kaku1

    kaku1 BANNED

    Messages:
    3,758
    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2010
    Ratings:
    +2 / 2,839 / -5
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    Whats your point?
     
  8. RAMPAGE

    RAMPAGE SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    5,163
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2012
    Ratings:
    +15 / 10,490 / -6
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Keep dreaming buddy!
     
  9. Luca1

    Luca1 SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,237
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2014
    Ratings:
    +3 / 2,792 / -6
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    Indians are perfectly fine with US navy controlling Indian Ocean. They won't think of attacking America.
     
  10. xyxmt

    xyxmt BANNED

    Messages:
    21,412
    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2012
    Ratings:
    +7 / 18,857 / -12
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Canada
    I am sorry to burst your bubble most defense thinker always compares you with Pakistan, hardly ever with China...everyone has accepted that India is no match for China.
     
  11. Biplab Bijay

    Biplab Bijay BANNED

    Messages:
    2,582
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2012
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,395 / -9
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    Ok.

    Most pakistani defense thinker. you should be specific.
     
  12. Luca1

    Luca1 SENIOR MEMBER

    Messages:
    2,237
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2014
    Ratings:
    +3 / 2,792 / -6
    Country:
    United States
    Location:
    United States
    Trust me, I want US to get out of that region. South Asia security is the responsibility of South Asian countries. India and Pakistan, as the regional powers, should try your best to maintain the security of the region. India also really need to view Pakistan and all its neighbors as equals instead of as subjects.
     
  13. xyxmt

    xyxmt BANNED

    Messages:
    21,412
    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2012
    Ratings:
    +7 / 18,857 / -12
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Canada
    They are ahead of us in every field there is no denying it. But the world still compares them with Pakistan and thats how it will be in the foreseeable future.
     
  14. xyxmt

    xyxmt BANNED

    Messages:
    21,412
    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2012
    Ratings:
    +7 / 18,857 / -12
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Canada
    read the article that OP has posted, written by Pakistani?? citing Pakistan branch of Carnegie Endowment for International Peace ??
     
  15. Biplab Bijay

    Biplab Bijay BANNED

    Messages:
    2,582
    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2012
    Ratings:
    +0 / 1,395 / -9
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    India
    And he is equal to most ?